Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:03:16.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of crossbred ewes from five crossing sire breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. J. L. Mann ,
C. Smith ,
J. W. B. King ,
D. Nicholson  and
D. I. Sales
T. J. L. Mann
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
C. Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. W. B. King
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
D. Nicholson
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
D. I. Sales
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

A contemporary comparison of crossbred ewes from five crossing sire breeds was made on a research farm from 1976 to 1981. The breeds involved were the traditional Border Leicester, three imported breeds — the East Friesian, the Oldenburg and the Texel, and a new prolific composite breed — the Cambridge. Rams from these breeds were group mated (2 to 3 rams per breed per year) to Scottish Blackface ewes on an upland farm in Scotland. Crossbred ewes derived from these matings were compared over three lamb crops on a lowland farm in England. The ewes were run together with the same husbandry conditions for all types. Results were available on some 120 to 150 ewes (300 to 450 lambings) per crossbred type. The Oldenburg and Texel crossbred ewes were appreciably poorer in most aspects of lowland lamb production. The Cambridge crosses were prolific but had high lamb mortality and lower litter weights at weaning than the traditional Border Leicester crosses. The East Friesian crosses were appreciably superior in several production traits. These results were combined with those from three other trials, involving crosses from the Bluefaced Leicester and Animal Breeding Research Organisation Damline to provide a ranking for UK crossing sire breeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 241 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boaz, T. G., Jones, R. and Smith, C. 1980. A note on a comparison of crossbreds from two prolific sheep breeds. Arum. Prod. 31: 323–325.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. D., Smith, C. and Deeble, F. K. 1983. Comparative performance of crossbred ewes from three crossing sire breeds. Anim Prod. 37: 415–421.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. N. 1982. The utilisation of breed resources in the improvement of sheep productivity. Proc. 2nd Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Vol. 5, pp. 635–654. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1960. Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. U.S. Dep. Agric, ARS-20-8. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1975. Genetic considerations in large field experiments. In Developments in Field Experimental Design and Analysis (ed. Bofinger, V. J. and Wheeler, J. L.), pp. 155–167. Bull. Commonwealth Agric. Bureaux, No. 50.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1972. Sheep Improvement. Report of a Scientific Study Group. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Nitter, G. 1978. Breed utilisation for meat production in sheep. Anim Breed. Abstr. 46: 131–143.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Brown, K. and Flint, R. 1980. Selection for prolificacy in sheep in relation to meat production characters. 31st A. Meeting Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Munich, Paper GI. 9.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Kino, J. W. B., Nicholson, D., Wolf, B. T. and Bampton, P. R. 1979. Performance of crossbred sheep from a synthetic damline. Anim. Prod. 29: 1–9.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Weiner, G. 1983. A note on the growth and food consumption of crossbred lambs of five sire breeds. Anim. Prod. 37: 137–140.Google Scholar