Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T23:08:08.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative retail value of beef carcasses from different groups of animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Harries ,
D. R. Williams  and
R. W. Pomeroy
J. M. Harries
Affiliation:
Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol
D. R. Williams
Affiliation:
Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol
R. W. Pomeroy
Affiliation:
Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol
Get access

Summary

A technique for evaluating beef carcasses in terms of their retail value, has been applied to 132 half-carcasses from seven groups of cattle (Jersey, Hereford, Polled Hereford, Lincoln Red, Devon, South Devon and Charolais × Jersey) to test the general applicability of the method, in particular the regression equations for predicting retail value. Significant differences in retail value were found between the groups of animals, South Devon and Charolais × Jersey having a high retail value per kg side weight, and Jerseys a low one. There was a very high correlation between retail value per kg side weight and the proportion of muscle in the side. Relationships between retail value and proportion of fat in the side were also investigated. It is not possible to decide, from these data, whether the differences found in retail value are a true breed effect, or whether they are due solely to differences in composition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Everitt, G. C. and Jury, K. E. 1964. Implantation of oestrogenic hormones in beef cattle. 4. Effects of oestradiol benzoate plus progesterone on carcass composition and a comparison of methods of carcass evaluation. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 7: 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, J. M., Williams, D. R. and Pomeroy, R. W. 1975. Prediction of comparative retail value of beef carcasses. Anim. Prod. 21: 127–137.Google Scholar
Harrington, G., Pomeroy, R. W. and Williams, D. R. 1961. Variations in the retail value of carcasses of Aberdeen Angus cross steers and heifers and their relation to conformation, bone content and finish. Vllth Meeting of European Meat Research Workers, Warsaw, 1961.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W., Williams, D. R., Harries, J. M. and Ryan, P. O. 1974. Composition of beef carcasess. I. Material, measurements, jointing and tissue separation. J. agric. Set, Camb. 83: 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R., Pomeroy, R. W., Harries, J. M. and Ryan, P. O. 1974. Composition of beef carcasses. II. The use of regression equations to estimate total tissue components from observations on intact and quartered sides and partial dissection data. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 83: 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar