Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T11:44:14.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breed and environmental factors affecting the reconception of indigenous beef cows in Botswana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. G. Buck  and
D. Light
N. G. Buck
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana
D. Light
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana
Get access

Abstract

The breeding records of 2710 lactating cows, of the Africander (1208), Tswana (542) and Tuli (960) breeds, were analysed to examine the effects of breed and environment on reconception. The reconception rate of Africander cows (0·56) was significantly lower than that of Tswana and Tuli cows (0·80 and 0·81 respectively) (P<0·01). The environmental effects of ranch, calving year, calving period and age/parity all had significant effects on reconception (P<0·01). Interactions between breed and the other main effects were all significant.

The Africander is considered to be a breed of lower fertility than the other two Sanga breeds, the Tswana and Tuli, in Botswana. The results are discussed with respect to determining management interventions to improve cow reproductive performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 413 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Animal Production Research Unit. 1978. Livestock and range research in Botswana. Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone.Google Scholar
Animal Production Research Unit. 1979. Livestock and range research in Botswana: annual report. Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone.Google Scholar
Buck, N. G., Light, D. and Makobo, A. D. 1980. Conception rates of beef cattle in Botswana following synchronization of oestrus with cloprostenol. Anim. Prod. 30: 61–67.Google Scholar
Buck, N. G., Light, D., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Rennie, T. W., Pratchett, D., Capper, B. S. and Trail, J. C. M. 1976. Environmental factors affecting beef cow reproductive performance in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 23: 357–363.Google Scholar
Capper, B. S., Pratchett, D., Rennie, T. W., Light, D., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Buck, N. G. and Trail, J. C. M. 1977. Effects of rumen stimulatory licks on reproductive performance and live-weight gain of beef cattle in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 24: 49–55.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. P. D. 1962. The Tuli cattle breed of Southern Rhodesia. Tuli Cattle Society, Salisbury. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Grosskopf, J. F. W. 1980. Non-pathogenic factors associated with the reconception of beef cows under extensive conditions. Proc. 4th Wld Anim. Prod. Conf., Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1960. Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. U.S. Dep. Agric, ARS-20-8 (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Holness, D. H., Hale, D. H. and Hopley, J. D. H. 1980. Ovarian activity and conception during the post-partum period in Afrikaner and Mashona cows. Zimbabwe J. Agric. Res. 18: 3–11.Google Scholar
Holness, D. H., Hopley, J. D. H. and Hale, D. H. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition, live weight, temporary weaning and breed on the occurrence of oestrus in beef cows during the post-partum period. Anim. Prod. 26: 47–54.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. 1970. The influence of undernutrition on reproduction in the cow. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 38: 359–372.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Edwards, R. A., Somerville, S. H. and Jolly, G. M. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of beef cows. Anim. Prod. 29: 293–303.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. and Maule, J. P. 1960. The Indigenous Livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Maule, J. P. 1973. The role of the indigenous breeds for beef production in southern Africa. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 3: 111–130.Google Scholar
Pratchett, D., Capper, B. S., Light, D. E., Miller, M. D., Rutherford, A. S., Rennie, T. W., Buck, N. G. and Trail, J. C. M. 1977. Factors limiting live-weight gain of beef cattle on rangeland in Botswana. J. Range Mgmt 30: 442–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. 2nd ed.Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J. D. G., van der Horst, Conny and Andrew, M. J. A. 1975. Reconception in grade and pedigree Africander cows of different sizes: postpartum factors influencing reconception. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 5: 103–110.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 1. Factors affecting weaner production from Angoni, Barotse and Boran dams. Anim. Prod. 30: 217–234.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M. 1981. Merits and demerits of importing exotic cattle compared with the improvement of local breeds. In Intensive Animal Production in Developing Countries, Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., No. 4, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
Trail, J. C. M., Buck, N. G., Light, D., Rennie, T. W., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Pratchett, D. and Capper, B. S. 1977. Productivity of Africander, Tswana, Tuli and crossbred beef cattle in Botswana. Anim. Prod. 24: 57–62.Google Scholar