Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:37:31.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Stolba  and
D. G. M. Wood-Gush
A. Stolba
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
D. G. M. Wood-Gush
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

In order to obtain a better knowledge of the behaviour of the domestic pig, a small population was established in 1978 near Edinburgh in an enclosure with several types of habitat, including woodland and bog. Over a 3·5-year period 13 different groups were studied with each group typically containing a boar, four sows, a young sub-adult boar and an immature gilt. The sow and her piglets were allowed to determine the time of weaning and, apart from providing food for maintenance and reproduction, handling was kept to a minimum. The behaviour of these pigs, which included most of the behaviour of the European wild boar, is described in a general manner for the non-specialist.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 419 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beuerle, W. 1975. Freilanduntersuchungen zum Kampf-und Sexualverhalten des europaischen Wildschweines. Zeiachrift für Tierpsychologie 39: 211–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. V. 1981. Domestic Animal Henavwur: Causes and Irnpiications for Animal Care and Management. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Ewbank, R. and Meese, G. B. 1974. Individual recognition and the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. The role of sight. Animal Behaviour 22: 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fradrich, H. 1974. A comparison of behaviour in the Suidae. In The Behaviour of Ungulates and Its Relation to Management. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Publication No. 24, pp. 133–143. Morges, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1973. The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. I. The importance of stimulation of the anterior teats. British Veterinary Journal 129: 324–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D. 1976. The nursing posture of domestic sows and related behaviour. Behaviour 57: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giffen, J. 1968–1972. The ecology of the feral pig in Hawaii. Pittman-Robertson Project No. W–15–3., Study No. 11.Google Scholar
Gundlach, H. 1965. Brutfürsorge, Brutpflege, Verhaltensontogenese und Tagesperiodik beim Europäischen Wildschwein. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 25: 955–995.Google Scholar
Hone, J. 1980. Effect of feral pig rooting on introduced and native pasture in north eastern New South Wales. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 46: 131–132.Google Scholar
Hone, J. and O'grady, J. 1980. Feral pigs and their control. Bulletin, New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Division of Animal Production, A4.1.1.Google Scholar
Hone, J., O'grady, J. and Pedersen, H. 1980. Decisions on the control of feral pig damage. Agricultural Bulletin, New South Wales Department of Agriculture, No. 5.Google Scholar
Hutton, R. C. M. 1983. The development of social behaviour in piglets. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Iff, U. 1975. Verhaltensbeobachtungen beim Schwarzwild. Feld, Wald, Wasser Schweizerische Jagdzeitung 3: 2–10.Google Scholar
Jensen, P., Floren, K. and Hobroh, B. 1987. Peri-parturient changes in behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1984. Social interactions in a group of free-ranging sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiley-Worthington, M. 1976. The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays. Behaviour 56: 69–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosniunas, E. H. 1979. Social facilitation and foraging behavior of the feral pig (Sus scrofa) on Santa-Cruz Island, California. M.A. Thesis, Zoology Department, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Kurz, J. C. and Marchinton, R. C. 1972. Radiotelemetry studies of feral pigs in South Carolina. Juornal of Wildlife Management 36: 1240–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marteys, M. 1977. Das Flehmen der Schweine. Suidae. Zoologischer Anzeiger Jena 199: 433–440.Google Scholar
Meynhardt, H. 1978. Schwarzwild — Report. Verlag Neumann-Neudamm, Nelsungen.Google Scholar
Newberry, R. C. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1985. The suckling behaviour of domestic pigs in a semi-natural environment. Behaviour 95: 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R. C. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1986. Social relationships of piglets in a semi-natural environment. Animal Behaviour 34: 1311–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R. C. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1988. Development of some behaviour patterns in piglets under semi-natural conditions. Animal Production 46: 103–109.Google Scholar
Pine, D. S. and Gerdes, G. L. 1973. Wild pigs in Monterey County, California. California Fish and Game 59: 126–137.Google Scholar
Pond, W. G. and Houpt, K. A. 1978. The Biology of the Pig. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P., Baldwin, B. A., Fraser, D. and Hafez, E. S. E. 1975. The behaviour of swine. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 295–329. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Stolba, A. 1981. A family system in enriched pens as a novel method of pig housing. In Alternatives to Intensive Husbandry Systems, Proceedings of the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare Symposium, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, pp. 52–67.Google Scholar
Stolba, A. 1983. Verhaltenmuster von Hausschweinen in einem Freigehege (Bemerkungen zum Film). KTBL-Schrift 299: 106–115.Google Scholar
Stolba, A. 1988. Ethograms of the domestic pig and European wild boar. In The Library of the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour, pp. 287–298.Google Scholar
Stolba, A. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1980. Arousal and exploration in growing pigs in different environments. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 382–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1981a. The assessment of behavioural needs of pigs under free-range and confined conditions. Applied Animal Ethology 7: 388–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1981b. Verhaltensgliederung und Reaktion auf Neureize als ethologische Kriterien zur Beurteilung von Haltungsbedingungen. In Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung. KTBL-Schrift 264: 110–128.Google Scholar
Stolba, A. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1983. The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 15: 287–298.Google Scholar