Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:55:02.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Architecture of a harmonized model of the growing pig for the determination of dietary net energy and protein requirements and of excretions into the environment (IMS Pig)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

D. M. Green  and
C. T. Whittemore
Get access

Abstract

The model incorporates, amongst its novel components, variable efficiency coefficients in the simulation of the responses of growing pigs to nutrient inputs, and thereby increases the accuracy and efficacy of control of feeding and nitrate excretion. The model determines (rather than is presented with) net energy and required amino acid level and balance. The estimation of protein turn-over as a function of rate of protein retention, protein mass and the maturity of the pig was found to be central to both the energy (ATP) and protein economy. Protein turn-over varied from around 0·14 to 0·08 of the protein mass depending upon the size of the pig. Efficiencies of energy yield from lipid, starch (and sugar), protein and (fibre-derived) volatile fatty acids were calculated to be 0·98, 0·86, 0·56 and 0·58 for ATP production and 0·90, 0·70, 0·50, and 0·44 for lipid retention, respectively. The maximum efficiency of use of ileal digestible amino acids was determined as around 0·85. The energy cost of protein synthesis was equivalent to 4·2 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per kg, and the efficiency of use of ME for protein retention varied from 0·55 to 0·40 depending on the protein mass of the pig. The components of the model and the biochemical drivers are described in detail, and proof of principle of the main elements is presented. The model is different in its architecture to other published simulation models, and is considered to add to the present knowledge base in this discipline.

Keywords

energygrowthmathematical modelspigsprotein
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , August 2003 , pp. 113 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK.Google Scholar
AmiPig., 2000. Ileal standardised digestibility of amino acids in feedstuffs for pigs. (AFZ, Ajinomoto Eurolysine, Aventis Animal Nutrition, INRA, ITCF). Association Française de Zootechnie, Paris. CD.Google Scholar
Bakker, G. C. M. 1996. Interaction between carbohydrates and fat in pigs: impact on energy evaluation of feeds. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wageningen.Google Scholar
Birkett, S. and de Lange, C. F. M. 2001a. Limitations of conventional models and a conceptual framework for a nutrient flow representation of energy utilization by animals. British Journal of Nutrition 86: 647–659.Google Scholar
Birkett, S. and de Lange, C. F. M. 2001b. A computational framework for a nutrient flow representation of energy utilization by growing monogastric animals. British Journal of Nutrition 86: 661–674.Google Scholar
Birkett, S. and de Lange, C. F. M. 2001c. Calibration of a nutrient flow model of energy utilization by growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 86: 675–689.Google Scholar
Black, J. L., Bray, H. L. and Giles, L. R. 1999. The thermal and infectious environment. In A quantitative biology of the pig (ed. Kyriazakis, I.), pp. 71–97. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Black, J. L., Campbell, R. G., Williams, I. H., James, K. J. and Davies, G. T. 1986. Simulation of energy and amino acid utilization in the pig. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 121–145.Google Scholar
Boisen, S. and Verstegen, M. W. A. 2000. Developments in the measurement of the energy content of feeds and energy utilisation in animals. In Feed evaluation (ed. Moughan, P. J., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Visser-Reyneveld, M. I.), pp. 57–76. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. and Clark, J. J. 1979. Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Animal Production 28: 353–369.Google Scholar
Carr, J. R., Boorman, K. N. and Cole, D. J. A. 1977. Nitrogen retention in the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 37: 143–155.Google Scholar
Chesson, A. 2000. Feed characterisation. In Feeding systems and feed evaluation models (ed. Theodorou, M. K. and France, J.), pp. 11–34. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Danfaer, A. 2000. A pig model for feed evaluation. In Modelling nutrient utilisation in farm animals (ed. Mc, J. P. Namara, J. France and Beever, D. E.), pp. 393–408. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Es, A. J. H. van. 1980. Energy costs of protein deposition. In Protein deposition in animals (ed. Buttery, P. J. and Lindsay, D. B.), pp. 215–224. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, J., Zhao, X. Q. and Eggum, B. 1996. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind gut and energy metabolism in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 75: 365–378.Google Scholar
Knap, P. W. 2000. Variation in maintenance requirements of growing pigs in relation to body composition. A simulation study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wageningen. Google Scholar
Knap, P. W. and Schrama, J. W. 1996. Simulation of growth in pigs: approximation of protein turn-over parameters. Animal Science 63: 533–547.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. 1999. A quantitative biology of the pig. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. and Emmans, G. C. 1992b. The effects of varying protein and energy intakes on the growth and body composition of pigs. 2. The effects of varying both energy and protein intake. British Journal of Nutrition 68: 615–625.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. and Emmans, G. C. 1992a. The growth of mammals following a period of nutritional limitation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 156: 485–498.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I., Emmans, G. C. and McDaniel, R. 1993. Whole body amino acid composition of the growing pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 62: 29–33.Google Scholar
Lange, C. F. M. de and Fuller, M. F. 2000. Advances in feed evaluation for pigs. In Feed evaluation principles and practice (ed. Moughan, P. J., Verstegen, M. W. A., and Visser-Reyneveld, M. I.), pp. 221–241. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Lange, C. F. M. de, Gillis, A. M. and Simpson, G. J. 2001. Influence of threonine intake on whole-body protein deposition and threonine utilisation in growing pigs fed purified diets. Journal of Animal Science 79: 3087–3095.Google Scholar
Lizardo, R., Milgen, J. van, Mourot, J., Noblet, J. and Bonneau, M. 2000. Modelling fatty acid composition of adipose tissue in the growing-finishing pig. In Proceedings of the 51st meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, The Hague (ed. van Arendonk, J. A. M.), p. 345.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. P., France, J. and Beever, D. E. 2000. Modelling nutrient utilisation in farm animals. CAB International, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. A., Whittemore, C. T. and Cockburn, J. H. S. 1984. The effect of level and source of protein, fibre and fat in the diet on the energy value of compounded pig feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11: 11–34.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. A., Whittemore, C. T., Phillips, P. and Crooks, P. 1987. The prediction of the energy value of compounded pig foods from chemical analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 17: 81–107.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J. 1999. Protein metabolism in the growing pig. In A quantitative biology of the pig (ed. Kyriazakis, I.), pp. 299–331. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J., Annison, G., Rutherford, S. M. and Wiseman, J. 1999. Chemical and physical description of feedstuffs. In A quantitative biology of the pig (ed. Kyriazakis, I.), pp. 39–69. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Visser-Reyneveld, M. I. 1995. Modelling growth in the pig. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen. Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th edition. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Noblet, J. and Henry, Y. 1991. Energy evaluation systems for pig diets. In Manipulating pig production 3 (ed. Batterham, E. S.), Proceedings of the third biennial conference of the Australian Pig Science Association, Attwood, Victoria, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
Noblet, J., Karege, C., Dubois, S. and Milgen, J. van. 1999. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1208–1216.Google Scholar
Noblet, J., Shi, X. S. and Dubois, S. 1993. Metabolic utilization of dietary energy and nutrients for maintenance energy requirements in sows: basis for a net energy system. British Journal of Nutrition 70: 407–419.Google Scholar
Powles, J., Wiseman, J., Cole, D. J. A. and Jagger, S. 1995. Prediction of the apparent digestible energy value of fats given to pigs. Animal Science 61: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiniou, N., Dourmad, J. -Y. and Noblet, J. 1996. Effect of energy intake on the performance of different types of pig from 45 to 100 kg body weight. 1. Protein and lipid deposition. Animal Science 63: 277–288.Google Scholar
Riis, P. M. 1983. The pools of tissue constituents and products: proteins. In Dynamic biochemistry of animal production (ed. Riis, P. M.), pp. 75–108. World animal science. A3. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Seve, B. and Hess, V. 2000. Amino acid digestibility in formulation of diets for pigs: present interest and limitations, future prospects. In Recent advances in animal nutrition 2000 (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Wiseman, J.), pp. 167–181. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1983. Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems 11: 159–186.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1995. Modelling the requirement of the young growing pig for dietary protein. Agricultural Systems 47: 415–425.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1998 The science and practice of pig production, second edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Fawcett, R. H. 1976. Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Animal Production 22: 87–96.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Green, D. M. 2002. The description of the rate of protein and lipid growth in pigs in relation to live weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138: 415–423.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Green, D. M. and Knap, P. W. 2001a. Technical review of the energy and protein requirements of growing pigs: food intake. Animal Science 73: 3–17.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Green, D. M. and Knap, P. W. 2001b. Technical review of the energy and protein requirements of growing pigs: energy. Animal Science 73: 199–215.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Green, D. M. and Knap, P. W. 2001c. Technical review of the energy and protein requirements of growing pigs: protein. Animal Science 73: 363–373.Google Scholar