Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:37:56.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in dietary ingredients for broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

V. Ravindran ,
L. I. Hew ,
G. Ravindran  and
W. L. Bryden
V. Ravindran*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
L. I. Hew
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
G. Ravindran
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
W. L. Bryden
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
*
∥E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids in 107 samples representing 22 food ingredients were determined using 6-week-old broiler chickens. The ingredients assayed included five cereals (barley, maize, sorghum, triticale and wheat), two cereal by-products (rice polishings and wheat middlings), four oilseed meals (canola, cottonseed, soya-bean and sunflower meals), full-fat canola, maize gluten meal, four grain legumes (chickpeas, faba beans, field peas and lupins) and five animal protein sources (blood, feather, fish, meat and meat and bone meals). The mean ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids in wheat and maize were higher than those in sorghum, triticale and barley. However, variations observed in individual amino acid digestibilities among samples within cereal type were greater than those determined between cereals. Threonine and lysine were the least digestible indispensable amino acids in the five cereals evaluated. The most digestible indispensable amino acid was phenylalanine in wheat and, leucine in maize and sorghum. In the case of the wheat middlings and rice polishings, threonine was the least digestible indispensable amino acid and arginine was the best digested.

In the oilseed meals assayed, amino acid digestibility was highest for soya-bean and sunflower meals, intermediate for canola meal and lowest for cottonseed meal. Ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids in lupins were found to be slightly lower than those in soya-bean meal. The amino acid digestibilities of field peas, faba beans and chickpeas were considerably lower than those of lupins. Digestibility of arginine was the highest and that of threonine was the lowest of the indispensable amino acids in oilseed meals and grain legumes, except in cottonseed meal. Lysine was the least digestible amino acid in cottonseed meal.

In the animal protein sources assayed, digestibility coefficients of amino acids in blood meal were high, intermediate in fish meal, and low in meat meal, meat and bone meal and feather meal. Variation in amino acid digestibility coefficients determined for blood meal samples was small. However, wide variations in amino acid digestibilities were observed for other animal protein sources, highlighting significant batch-to-batch differences. In particular, marked variations were determined for meat meal and meat and bone meal samples. Cystine was the least digested amino acid in animal protein meals, with the exception of blood meal in which isoleucine had the lowest digestibility. The limitations of using apparent digestibility values in diet formulations and the concept of the standardized digestibility system to overcome these limitations are discussed.

Keywords

amino acidschickensdigestibilityileumingredients
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , August 2005 , pp. 85 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
‡Chia Tai Co. Ltd, No. 1, FanHua Avenue, Economic and Technology Development Area, Hefei, Anhui Province 230601, China.
§School of Animal Studies, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.

References

Aitkinson, J. and Carpenter, K. J. 1970. Nutritive value of meat meals. II. Influence of raw materials and processing on meat meal quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 21: 366–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hafermann, J. C., Zhang, Y. and Parsons, C. M. 1993. Effect of processing on the nutritional quality of canola meal. Poultry Science 72: 326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angkanaporn, K., Choct, M. and Bryden, W. L. 1994. Effects of wheat pentosans on endogenous amino acid losses in chickens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 66: 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angkanaporn, K., Ravindran, V. and Bryden, W. L. 1996. Additivity of apparent and true ileal amino acid digestibilities in soybean meal, sunflower meal and meat and bone meal for broilers. Poultry Science 75: 1098–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angkanaporn, K., Ravindran, V. and Bryden, W. L. 1997. Influence of caecectomy and dietary protein level on apparent excreta amino acid digestibility in adult cockerels. British Poultry Science 38: 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, G. and Choct, M. 1991. Anti-nutritive activities of cereal non-starch polysaccharides in broiler diets and strategies minimising their effects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of American Feed Control Officials. 2000. Official publication of the Association of American Feed Control Officials, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baker, D. H. 1994. Ideal amino acid profile for maximal protein accretion and minimal nitogen excretion in swine and poultry. Proceedings of the Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, pp. 134–139, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Baliga, B. P. and Lyman, C. M. 1957. Preliminary report on the nutritional significance of bound gossypol in cottonseed meal. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 34: 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73: 679–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisen, S. and Moughan, P. J. 1996. Different expressions of dietary protein and amino acid digestibility in pig feeds and their application in protein evaluation: a theoretical approach. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 46: 165–172.Google Scholar
Bryden, W. L., Hew, L. I. and Ravindran, V. 2000. Digestible amino acid values: variation and application. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 12: 51–58.Google Scholar
Bryden, W. L. and Li, X. 2003. Prediction of amino acid digestibility of complete broiler diets. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 15: 67.Google Scholar
Carre, B. 1997. The qualities of grain legumes for poultry. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 9: 46–53.Google Scholar
Cichon, R. M. and Sauer, W. C. 1980. Amino acid availability and protein quality of canola and rapeseed meal for pigs and rats. Journal of Animal Science 51: (suppl. 1) 206.Google Scholar
Degussa, . 2001. The amino acid composition of feedstuffs, fifth revised edition. Degussa AG Feed Additives, Hanau, Germany.Google Scholar
Eggum, B. O., Tomes, G., Beames, R. M. and Datta, F. U. 1993. Protein and energy evaluation with rats of seed from 11 lupin cultivars. Animal Feed Science and Technology 43: 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkin, R. G., Freed, M. B., Hamaker, B. R., Zhang, Y. and Parsons, C. M. 1996. Condensed tannins are only partially responsible for variations in nutrient digestibilities of sorghum grain cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44: 848–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteve-Garcia, E., Caparo, E. and Brufau, J. 1993. Formulation with total versus digestible amino acids. Proceedings of the ninth European symposium on poultry nutrition, Jelenia Góra, Poland pp. 318–328.Google Scholar
Estoe, J. E. and Long, J. E. 1960. The amino acid composition of processed bones and meat meal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 11: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. J., Cheung, P. C. K. and Cheetham, N. W. H. 1993. The carbohydrate composition of cotyledons and hulls of cultivars of Lupinus angustifolius from Western Australia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 61: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, M. Z. and Sauer, W. C. 1995. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for pigs with direct, difference and regression methods. Journal of Animal Science 73: 2364–2374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, M. Z., Sauer, W. C., Hardin, R. T. and Lien, K. A. 1994. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs: effect of dietary amino acid level. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2851–2859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatel, F. 1994. Protein quality of legume seeds for non-ruminant animals: a literature review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 45: 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. 1987. Digestibilities of amino acids in feedstuffs for poultry and pigs. Digestibility report 8/87, A. E. C. Rhone-Poulenc, Commentry, France.Google Scholar
Green, S., Bertrand, S. L., Duron, M. J. C. and Maillard, R. 1987. Digestibilities of amino acids in maize, wheat, and barley meals, determined with intact and caecectomised cockerels. British Poultry Science 28: 631–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, S. and Kiener, T. 1989. Digestibilities of nitrogen and amino acids in soya-bean, sunflower, meat and rapeseed meals measured with pigs and poultry. Animal Production 48: 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heartland Lysine. 1996. Digestibility of essential amino acids for poultry and swine, version 3.3. Heartland Lysine, Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
Hendriks, W. H., Butts, C. A., Thomas, D. V., James, K. A. C., Morel, P. C. H. and Verstegen, M. W. A. 2002. Nutritional quality of meat and bone meals. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 15: 1507–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hew, L. I., Ravindran, V., Gill, R. J., Mollah, Y. and Bryden, W. L. 1998. Effects of enzyme supplementation on apparent metabolisable energy and amino acid digestibility of wheat for broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 75: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, K., Bryden, W. L., Ravindran, V. and Li, X. 2000. Ileal protein digestibility of selected feedstuffs determined with adult cockerels, layers and broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13: (suppl. A) 137.Google Scholar
Imbeah, M., Sauer, W. C. and Mosenthin, R. 1988. The prediction of the digestible amino acid supply in barley-soybean meal or canola meal diets and pancreatic enzymes secretion in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66: 1409–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakas, P., Versteegh, H. A. J., van der Honing, Y., Kogut, J. and Jongbloed, A. W. 2001. Nutritive value of the meat and bone meals from cattle or pigs in broiler diets. Poultry Science 80: 1180–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knabe, D. A., LaRue, D. C., Gregg, E. J., Martinez, G. M. and Tanksley, T. D. Jr 1989. Apparent digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids in protein feedstuffs by growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67: 441–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemme, A., Cremers, S., Pallauf, J., Rostagno, H. S., Pack, M. and Petri, A. 2001. Apparent and true ileal amino acid digestibility of vegetable and animal protein of different origin in broilers. Proceedings of the thirteenth European symposium on poultry nutrition, Blankenberge, Belgium, pp. 169–170.Google Scholar
Lemme, A., Ravindran, V. and Bryden, W. L. 2004. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likuski, H. J. A. and Dorrell, H. G. 1978. A bioassay for rapid determinations of amino acid availability values. Poultry Science 57: 1658–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLelland, J. 1979. Digestive system. In Form and function in birds, volume 1 (ed. King, A. S. and McLelland, J.), pp. 69–181. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
McNab, J. M. 1989. Measuring availability of amino acids from digestibility experiments. Proceedings of the seventh European symposium on poultry nutrition, pp. 45–53. World's Poultry Science Association, Girona, Spain.Google Scholar
Minitab, . 1996. Minitab user's guide, version 11. Minitab Inc., State College, PA.Google Scholar
Mitaru, B. N., Reichert, R. D. and Blair, R. 1985. Protein and amino acid digestibilities for chickens of reconstituted and boiled sorghum grains varying in tannin contents. Poultry Science 64: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. Journal of Biological Chemistry 238: 235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of domestic animals: nutrient requirements of poultry, ninth revised edition. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Newkirk, R. W., Classen, H. L., Scott, T. A. and Penney, M. J. 2003. The digestibility and content of amino acids in toasted and non-toasted canola meals. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83: 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyachoti, C. M., Atkinson, J. L. and Leeson, S. 1997. Sorghum tannins: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 53: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, C. M. 1991. Amino acid digestibilities for poultry: feedstuff evaluation and requirements. Kyowa Hakko technical review-1, Kyowa, Chesterfield, MO.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. M., Castanon, F. and Han, Y. 1997. Protein and amino acid quality on meat and bone meal. Poultry Science 76: 361–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, C. M., Hashimoto, K., Wedekind, K. J., Han, Y. and Baker, D. H. 1991. Effect of overprocessing on the availability of amino acids and energy in soybean meal. Poultry Science 71: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, L., Fernandez-Figares, I., Nieto, R., Aquilera, J. F. and Prieto, C. 1993. Amino acid ileal digestibility of some grain legumes in growing chickens. Animal Production 56: 261–267.Google Scholar
Perttila, S., Valaja, J., Partanen, K., Jalava, T., Kiiskinen, T. and Palander, S. 2001. Effects of preservation method and β-glucanase supplementation on ileal amino acid digestibility and feeding value of barley for poultry. British Poultry Science 42: 218–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petterson, D. S., Sipsas, S. and MacKintosh, J. B. 1997. The chemical composition and nutritive value of Australian pulses. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Kingston, Australian Capitol Territory, Australia.Google Scholar
Phelps, R. A. 1966. Cottonseed meal for poultry: from research to practical application. World's Poultry Science Journal 22: 86–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademacher, M., Sauer, W. C. and Jansman, A. J. M. 1999. Standardised ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. Feed Additives Division, Degussa-Huls AG, Hanua, Germany.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V. and Blair, R. 1991. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. I. Energy sources. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V. and Blair, R. 1992. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. II. Plant protein sources. World's Poultry Science Journal 48: 206–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V. and Blair, R. 1993. Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. III. Animal protein sources. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V. and Bryden, W. L. 1999. Amino acid availability in poultry-in vitro and in vivo measurements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V. and Hendriks, W. H. 2004. Endogenous amino acid flows at the terminal ileum of broilers, layers and adult roosters. Animal Science 79: 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V., Hendriks, W. H., Camden, B. J., Thomas, D. V., Morel, P. C. H. and Butts, C. A. 2002. Amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals for broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53: 1257–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V., Hew, L. I., Ravindran, G. and Bryden, W. L. 1999a. A comparison of ileal digesta and excreta analysis for the determination of amino acid digestibility in feed ingredients for poultry. British Poultry Science 40: 266–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravindran, V., Hew, L. I., Ravindran, G. and Bryden, W. L. 2004. Endogenous amino acid flow in the avian ileum: quantification using three techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 92: 217–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravindran, V., Hew, L. I., Ravindran, G., Gill, R. J., Pittolo, P. and Bryden, W. L. 1999b. Influence of xylanase supplementation on the apparent metabolizable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility in a diet containing wheat and oats, and on the performance of three strains of broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 1159–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhone-Poulenc, . 1995. Digestibility database for poultry, Rhone-Poulenc Animal Nutrition, Antony, France.Google Scholar
Rostagno, H. S., Rogler, J. C. and Featherston, W. R. 1973. Studies on the nutritional value of sorghum grains with varying tannin contents for chicks. 2. Amino acid digestibility studies. Poultry Science 52: 772–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Cichon, R. and Misir, R. 1982. Amino acid availability and protein quality of canola and rapeseed meals for pigs and rats. Journal of Animal Science 54: 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, W. C. and Ozimek, L. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical application. A review. Livestock Production Science 15: 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senkoylu, N. and Dale, N. 1999. Sunflower meal in poultry diets: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 55: 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, R. B. and Parsons, C. M. 2000. Effect of pressure processing on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal for poultry. Poultry Science 79: 1775–1781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibbald, I. R. 1979a. A bioassay for available amino acids and true metabolizable energy in feedingstuffs. Poultry Science 58: 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. 1979b. Bioavailable amino acids and true metabolizable energy of cereal grains. Poultry Science 58: 934–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. 1986. The T. M. E. system of feed evaluation: methodology, feed composition data and bibiliography. Technical bulletin 1986–4E, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siriwan, P., Bryden, W. L. and Annison, E. F. 1989 Effects of dietary fibre and protein levels on endogenous secretions in chickens. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia. 14: 143.Google Scholar
Siriwan, P., Bryden, W. L., Mollah, Y. and Annison, E. F. 1993. Measurement of endogenous amino acid losses in poultry. British Poultry Science 34: 939–949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skurray, G. R. 1974. The nutritional evaluation of meat meals for poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal 30: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skurray, G. R. and Herbert, L. S. 1974. Batch dry rendering: Influence of raw materials and processing conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25: 1071–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, E. L., York, J. O., Bragg, D. B. and Ivy, C. A. 1971. The amino acid content and availability of different strains of grain sorghum to the chick. Poultry Science 50: 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, R. A. 1989. Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds: collaborative study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 72: 770–774.Google ScholarPubMed
Tanksley, T. D., Knabe, D. A., Purser, K., Zebrowska, T. and Corley, J. R. 1981. Apparent digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen in three cotton-seed meals and one soybean meal. Journal of Animal Science 52: 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkachuk, R. 1969. Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for cereals and oilseed meals. Cereal Chemistry 46: 419–424.Google Scholar
Wang, X and Parsons, C. M. 1998. Effect of raw material source, processing system, and processing temperatures on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals. Poultry Science 77: 834–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, B. E. and Farrell, D. J. 1991. The nutritive value of full-fat and defatted Australian rice bran. V. The apparent retention of minerals and apparent digestibility of amino acids in chicken and adult cockerels fitted with cannulae. Animal Feed Science and Technology 27: 232–242.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J., Al-Mazooqi, W., Welham, T. and Domoney, C. 2003. The apparent ileal digestibility, determined with young broilers, of amino acids in near-isogenic lines of peas ( Pisum sativum L) differing in trypsin inhibitor activity. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 644–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, F., Barry, T. N., Moughan, P. J. and Wilson, G. F. 1993. Condensed tannin and gossypol concentrations in cotton seeds and in processed cottonseed meal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 63: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, F., Moughan, P. J. and Barry, T. N. 1996. The effect of condensed tannins from heated and unheated cotton seeds on the ileal digestibility of amino acids for the growing rat and pig. British Journal of Nutrition 76: 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y. and Parsons, C. M. 1994. Effect of overprocessing on the nutritional quality of sunflower meal. Poultry Science 73: 436–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar