Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:45:21.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of an open nucleus breeding programme for Djallonkè sheep in the Ivory Coast. 2. Response to selection on body weights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. V. Yapi-Gnaorè
Affiliation:
Institut Des Savanes (IDESSA), DRA. 01 BP 633 Bouakè 01, Ivory Coast
J. E. O. Rege
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
A. Oya
Affiliation:
ANADER/PNSO, 01 BP 1166 Bouakè 01, Ivory Coast
Nega Alemayehu
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

A selection programme was set up in 1983 in the Ivory Coast to improve the growth and live weight of the indigenous Djallonkè sheep using an open nucleus breeding system. Selection was based on male individual weights at 80, 180 and 365 days of age. Multiple sires were used in farmers' flocks. Individual animal model, using average numerator relationship was used to estimate breeding values from which genetic trends were derived. This paper reports results of the analyses of 10 417 records of 80-day weights (WT80) of lambs born between 1984 and 1992 from 29 participating farmers, and 1978 and 849 records on 180- (WT180) and 365- (WT365) day weights, respectively, of lambs from the nucleus. Phenotypic trends exhibited substantial annual fluctuation during the study period. The heaviest weights were obtained in 1986 (10·1 kg) for WT80, 1984 (23·3 kg) for WT180 and 1985 (33·7 kg) for WT365. There was an annual decline of 152 g (P<0·05) in WT80 mainly (–180 g/year) due to negative environmental trend. The phenotypic and environmental trends for WT180 were –703 and –721 g/year, respectively, while the corresponding values for WT365 were –931 and –956 g/year. Overall mean weights of the ram lambs at the three ages were 9·9, 23·3 and 33·7 kg, respectively in the base year and 9·3, 17·8 and 28·2 kg, respectively in the final year. Breeding values increased by 28, 11 and 14 g/year for WT80, WT180 and WT365, respectively. Results of this study indicate that genetic progress can be made in growth performance of Djallonkè sheep if reasonable levels of animal management as well as selection pressure are maintained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afrique Agriculture. 1989. Elevage et productions animates. Reportage Côte d'lvoire, Juin 1989, no. 164, pp. 1732.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. N. and Rae, A. L. 1977. Technical aspects of the National Sheep Recording Scheme (SHEEPLAN). Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 37: 183197.Google Scholar
Disset, R., Jetteur, P. and Sauter, P. 1981. Bilan de I'encadrement ovin. 1981, Règion Centre. Ministere de la Production Animale, Côte d'lvoire.Google Scholar
Eikje, E. D. 1978. Genetic progress from performance and progeny test selection in Down sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 38: 161173.Google Scholar
Foulley, J. L., Gianola, D. and Plachenault, D. 1987. Sire evaluation with uncertain paternity. Gènètique Sèlection Evolution 19: 83102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisch, J. E. 1981. Changes occurring in cattle as a consequence of selection for growth rate in a stressful environment. Journal of Agriculture Science, Cambridge 96: 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, D. R., Croston, D., Jones, D., Williams, G. L. and Cameron, N. D. 1986. Response to selection in Welsh Mountain sheep. Animal Production 42: 442 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Proceedings of an animal breeding symposium in honor of Dr J. L. Lush, pp. 1041. American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association, Champaign, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1988. The use of an average relationship matrix for multiple sire joining. Journal of Animal Science 66: 16141621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, N. and Turner, H. N. 1972. Optimal structure for a co-operative nucleus breeding system. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9: 5564.Google Scholar
James, J. W. 1977. Open nucleus breeding systems. Animal Production 24: 287305.Google Scholar
Manno, J. M. 1981. Situation et perspectives de l'èlevage ovin en Cote d'lvoire. Ministére de la Production Animale, Bureau des Projets, Côte d'lvoire.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1991. DFREML user notes, version 2.0.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Production Animale. 1976. L'èlevage en Côte d'lvoire. Programme de dèveloppement. Dècembre 1976. Bureau des Projects, Côte d'lvoire.Google Scholar
Oya, A. 1989. Le programme national de sèlection ovine de Côte d'lvoire, 1984-1988. In Proceedings of the conference of African small ruminant research and development (ed. Wilson, R. T. and Melaku, A.), pp. 470486. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Oya, A. 1990. Rapport annual 1990. Ministère de l'Agriculture et des Ressources Animales, SODEPRA Centre, Bouakè, Côte d'lvoire.Google Scholar
Perez-Enciso, M. and Fernando, R. L. 1992. Genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage: a comparison of methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 173179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poivey, J. P. and Elsen, J. M. 1984. Estimation de la valeur gènètique des reproducteurs dans la cas d'incertitude sur les apparentements. I. Formulation des indices de sèlection. Gènètique Sèlection Evolution 16: 445454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poivey, J. P., Landais, E. and Berger, Y. 1982. Etude et amèlioration gènètique de la croissance des agneaux Djallonkè. Rèsultats obtenus au Centre de Recherches Zootechniques de Bouakè (Côte d'lvoire). Revue d'Elevage et de Mèdecine Vètèrinaire des Pays Tropicaux 35: 421433.Google Scholar
Steine, T. 1985. Genetic studies of reproduction in Norwegian sheep. In Genetics of reproduction in sheep (ed. Land, R. B. and Robinson, D. W.), pp. 4754. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierry-Lebbe, M. A. 1968. Les productions animales en Côte d'lvoire: situation actuelle et perspectives de dèveloppement. Ministére de la Production Animale, Côte d'lvoire.Google Scholar
Wiggans, G. R., Misztal, I. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1988. Animal model evaluation of Ayrshire milk yield with all lactations, herd-sire interaction, and groups based on unknown parents. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 13191329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yapi-Gnaorè, C. V., Oya, A., Rege, J. E. O. and Dagnogo, B. 1997. Analysis of an open nucleus breeding programme for Djallonkè sheep in the Ivory Coast. 1. Examination of non-genetic factors. Animal Science 64: 291300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar