Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:57:12.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An egg transfer study of litter size, birth weight and lamb survival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. E. Bradford ,
C. S. Taylor ,
J. F. Quirke  and
R. Hart
G. E. Bradford
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
J. F. Quirke
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
R. Hart
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

In an egg-transfer experiment, seven breeds of sheep differing widely in mean mature ewe weight were used: Oxford Down, 96 kg; Borderm Leicester, 77; Finnish Landrace, 55; Southdown, 52; Tasmanian Merino, 42; Welsh Mountain, 34; and Soay, 22. Body weight and gestation length of recipient ewes are briefly examined. Of 60 recipient ewes, 95% became pregnant. Embryo survival averaged 69% and appeared to be independent of breed of embryo. Litter size of Welsh Mountain, Border Leicester and Finnish Landrace ewes each given four eggs averaged 2·6, 2·9 and 2·9 respectively so that most of the normally observed breed differences are mainly due to differences in ovulation rate. Observed birth weights were in general agreement with those predicted from litter size and donor and recipient ewe weights. The maternal capacity of Finnish ewes was close to average. Litter size affected survival mainly through its effect on birth weight. For Oxford lambs in litters of 3 to 5 from Finnish recipients, birth weight was 42% that of normal single-born Oxfords and only 42% survived. For Soays the corresponding values were 59% for birth weight and 85% for survival. Finnish lambs were exceptionally small at birth but had the highest viability of all breeds. Lamb mortality was higher for males (18%) than females (9%) especially in large litters (26 v. 11%) but about the same in both sexes for Finnish lambs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 249 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bradford, G. E. 1972. Genetic control of litter size in sheep. J. Reprod. Fert. (Suppl.) 15: 23–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Bradford, G. E., Hart, R., Quirke, J. F. and Land, R. B. 1972. Genetic control of the duration of gestation in sheep. J. Reprod. Fert. 30: 459–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, G. E., Quirke, J. F. and Hart, R. 1971. Natural and induced ovulation rate of Finnish Landrace and other breeds of sheep. Anim. Prod. 13: 627–635.Google Scholar
Dickinson, A. G., Hancock, J. L., Hovell, G. J. R., Taylor, St. C. S. and Wiener, G. 1962. The size of lambs at birth—a study involving egg transfer. Anim. Prod. 4: 64–79.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. and Russell, W. L. 1970. The relationship between live weight of ewe at mating and weight of newborn lamb. Anim. Prod. 12: 273–280.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. L., Adams, C. E. and Rowson, L. E. A. 1955. Inter-breed ovum transfer in sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 46: 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, R. A. S. and Rowson, L. E. A. 1972. The influence of breed of ewe and offspring on litter size after egg transfer in sheep. J. Reprod. Fert. 28: 433–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, N. W. 1968. The survival and development of fertilized eggs transferred between Border Leicester and Merino ewes. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, N. W. and Rowson, L. E. A. 1960. Egg transfer in sheep. Factors affecting the survival and development of transferred eggs. J. Reprod. Fert. 1: 332–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, J. E. and Betts, J. E. 1972. A note on the effect of tail-tying on the reproductive performance of Welsh Mountain ewes. Anim. Prod. 14: 363–365.Google Scholar
Purser, A. F. and Young, C. B. 1964. Mortality among twin and single lambs. Anim. Prod. 6: 321–329.Google Scholar
Rowson, L. E. A. and Moor, R. M. 1966. Embryo transfer in the sheep: the significance of synchronizing oestrus in the donor and recipient animal. J. Reprod. Fert. 11: 207–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, M. 1964. Relation of birth weight to death losses and to certain productive characters of fall born lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar