Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T10:55:00.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of carcass probes for use in Great Britain for the EC pig Carcass Grading Scheme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. L. Cook ,
J. P. Chadwick  and
A. J. Kempster
G. L. Cook
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
J. P. Chadwick
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Get access

Abstract

To gain approval for use in the revised European Community (EC) Pig Grading Scheme to be introduced in 1989, methods of estimating carcass lean proportion must be shown to do so with a coefficient of determination greater than 0·64 and a residual s.d. of less than 25 g/kg. A trial was carried out to assess a number of methods for use in the EC Scheme as applied in Great Britain. Subcutaneous fat and m. longissimus depths at the head of the last rib and at the third/fourth from last rib were measured using the optical probe (OP), the Fat-O-Meater (FOM), the Hennessy Grading Probe II (HGP) and the Destron PG-100 Probe (DST) on a broad sample of 162 commercial carcasses representative of the ranges in fatness and weight found nationally. The left side of each carcass was separated into component tissues. Although the instruments all achieved similar levels of accuracy in predicting carcass lean proportion, some differences were found. The DST just failed to reach the required statistical criteria for approval in the EC Scheme. The results for the other three instruments were submitted to Brussels as evidence of suitability and they have been approved.

Using the regression relationships found between carcass composition and fat thickness together with results from earlier studies, it was estimated that the carcass separable fat proportion of British slaughter pigs has fallen at the annual rate of 7 g/kg since 1975.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 427 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, P. 1985. An Evaluation of Automatic Grading Probes for Predicting the Lean Meat Content of Pork Carcasses. Report by the Meat Research Department, An Foras Talúntais.Google Scholar
Commission of The European Communities. 1979. Development of uniform methods of pig carcass classification in the EEC. Information on Agriculture Series, No. 70. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Commission of The European Communities. 1987. Official Journal No. L 1461/66.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. 1968. PIDA dissection techniques. Proceedings of the Symposium on Methods of Carcass Evaluation, European Association for Animal Production, Dublin. (Mimeograph.)Google Scholar
Diestre, A., Gispert, M. and Oliver, M. A.The evaluation of automatic probes in Spain for the new scheme for pig carcass grading according to the EC regulations. Animal Production 48: 443–448.Google Scholar
Diestre, A. and Kempster, A. J. 1985. The estimation of pig carcass composition from different measurements with special reference to classification and grading. Animal Production 41: 383–391.Google Scholar
Fortin, A., Jones, S. D. M. and Haworth, C. R. 1984. Pork carcass grading: a comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater. Meat Science 10: 131–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J., Cmadwick, J. P. and Jones, D. W. 1985. An evaluation of the Hennessy Grading Probe and the SFK Fat-O-Meater for use in pig carcass classification and grading. Animal Production 40: 323–329.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Grantley-smith, M. 1986. National estimates of the body composition of British cattle, sheep and pigs with special reference o t trends in fatness. A review. Meat Science 17: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing, pp. 132–145. Granada, St Albans.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1988. Pig Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley.Google Scholar
Usborne, W. R., Menton, D. and McMillan, I. 1985. Accuracy of measurement and yield prediction of the PG-100 electronic pork grading probe. Report to Destron Ltd from the University of Guelph. (Mimeograph.)Google Scholar