Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:16:50.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sucrose as an energy source for growing pigs: digestible energy content and energy utilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. A. Beech ,
R. Elliott  and
E. S. Batterham
S. A. Beech
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia
R. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
E. S. Batterham
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of including sucrose in diets on energy utilization by growing pigs. In the first experiment, the digestible energy (DE) content of sucrose was determined as 15·6 MJ/kg, indicating that gross energy was 0·96 digested. In the second experiment, iso-energetic diets were used to determine the effects of sucrose on growth and nutrient utilization. Sucrose was used to replace wheat gradually in four iso-energetic diets (15 MJ DE, 0·75 g lysine per MJ DE for pigs from 20 to 50 kg live weight and 15·1 MJ DE, 0·67 g lysine per MJ DE for pigs from 50 to 80 kg live weight). Pigs were fed ad libitum. Food intake (P < 0·01) and carcass daily gain (P < 0·05) increased with sucrose inclusion, independently of the level of sucrose in the diet. Food conversion ratio of male (boar) pigs on a carcass basis was unaffected by sucrose inclusion but increased with female pigs (P < 0·01). Killing-out proportion increased linearly with sucrose inclusion (P < 0·01). Sucrose inclusion improved energy retention (P < 0·05) and increased fat deposition (P < 0·05) but protein deposition was not affected. The weight of the full viscera (P < 0·01), empty digestive tract (P < 0·05), stomach (P < 0·01) and large intestine (P < 0·05) decreased with increasing sucrose inclusion. Sucrose did not affect blood triglycerides or cholesterol concentration (P > 0·05). Sucrose inclusion decreased the crude fibre and crude protein content of the diet and energy utilization was improved. Differences in gut fill indicated that sucrose-based diets were rapidly digested and absorbed.

Keywords

energy retentiongrowthpigssucrose
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 343 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. L. and Allison, M. J. 1983. Rumen metabolism. Journal of Animal Science 57: 461–477.Google ScholarPubMed
Brooks, C. C. 1972. Molasses, sugar (sucrose), corn, tallow, soybean oil and mixed fats as sources of energy for growing swine. Journal of Animal Science 34: 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckdorfer, K. R. and Yudkin, J. 1975. A comparison of dietary sucrose in the pig. Nutrition and Metabolism 19: 225–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buitrago, J., Garcia, E., Maner, J. H. and Gallo, J. T. 1970. Sugar in the feeding of pigs. 2. Crude sugar in rations for growing and finishing pigs. Revista Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario 5: 419–423.Google Scholar
Burlacu, G., Baia, G., Ionila, D., Moisa, D., Taşcenco, V., Vişan, I. and Stoica, I. 1973. Efficiency of the utilization of the energy of food in piglets, after weaning. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helland, S. J., Ewan, R. C., Trenkle, A. and Nissen, S. 1986. In vivo metabolism of leucine and α-ketoisocaproate in the pig: influence of dietary glucose or sucrose. Journal of Nutrition 116: 1902–1909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, G. J. and Wilson, K. J. 1982. Amino acid analyses using isocratic and gradient elution modes on Kontron AS-70 (7 μm) resin. Journal of Chromatography 242: 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J. W. and Brown, W. O. 1970. The retention of energy and protein in the baby pig fed on cows' milk. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals [ed. Schurch, A. and Wenk, C.], pp. 161–164. Juris Druck and Verlag, Zurich.Google Scholar
Just, A., Fernández, J. A. and Jørgensen, H. 1983a. The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients. Livestock Production Science 10: 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A., Jørgenson, H., Fernández, J. A. and Bech-andersen, S. 1983b. The chemical composition, digestibility, energy and protein value of different feedstuffs for pigs. Report, National Institute of Animal Science, Denmark, No. 556.Google Scholar
Keys, J. E. and De barthe, J. V. 1974. Site and extent of carbohydrate, dry matter, energy and protein digestion and the rate of passage of grain diets in swine. Journal of Animal Science 39: 57–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maner, J. H., Obando, H., Portela, R. and Gallo, J. 1969. Effect of levels of refined sugar (sucrose) on the performance of growing/finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 29: 139 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Metcalfe, L. D., Schmitz, A. A. and Pelka, J. R. 1966. Rapid preparation of fatty acid esters from lipids for gas chromatographic analysis. Analytical Chemistry 38: 514–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. J. 1972. Energy values in pig nutrition. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Reiser, S. J., Hallfrisch, J., Michaelis, O. E., Lazar, F. L., Martin, R. E. and Prather, E. S. 1978. Iso-caloric exchange of dietary starch and sucrose in humans. 1. Effects on levels of fasting blood lipids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32: 1659–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rerat, A. A., Vaissade, P. and Vaugelade, P. 1984a. Absorption kinetics of some carbohydrates in conscious pigs. 1. Qualitative aspects. British Journal of Nutrition 51: 505–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rerat, A. A., Vaissade, P. and Vaugelade, P. 1984b. Absorption kinetics of some carbohydrates in conscious pigs. 2. Quantitative aspects. British Journal of Nutrition 51: 517–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumacher, E., Elliott, R., McMeniman, N. P. and Griffiths, I. 1986. Evaluation of raw sugar as an energy source for growing/fattening pigs. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 16: 359–362.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture. 1987. Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock — Pigs. CSIRO Editorial and Publishing Unit, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Stanogias, G. and Pearce, G. R. 1985. The digestion of fibre by pigs. 3. Effects of the amount and type of fibre on physical characteristics of segments of the gastrointestinal tract. British Journal of Nutrition 53: 537–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterman, R. A., Romsos, D. R., Tsai, A. C., Miller, E. R. and Lkveille, G. A. 1975. Effects of dietary carbohydrate source on growth, plasma metabolites and lipogenesis in rats, pigs and chicks. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 150: 220–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed