Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:43:02.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The significance of breed in the prediction of lamb carcass composition from fat thickness measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Wood  and
H. J. H. MacFie
J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
H. J. H. MacFie
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

Fat thickness and measurements of the m. longissimus (‘eye’ muscle) were taken at the last rib in 350 lambs' carcasses which were fully dissected. The lambs were from two ewe breeds, Clun and Colbred, and two ram breeds, Suffolk and Hampshire, and the carcass weight range was 15 to 21kg. Castrated males and females, and singles and twins, were evenly represented.

Rib fat thickness (J) was a slightly more precise predictor of the weights of lean, subcutaneous fat and subcutaneous plus intermuscular fat, when used in a multiple regression equation along with carcass weight, than fat thickness directly above the greatest depth of the ‘eye’ muscle (C). Both of these were more precise predictors than ‘eye’ muscle width and depth. Accounting for breed, either by allowing for different intercepts or completely different regression lines, did increase the proportion of variation in tissue weights explained by carcass weight and J or C, but to a small and, it was considered, commercially unimportant extent. This was despite differences in conformation between the breeds, reflected in this work by smaller ‘eye’ muscles in the ewe than the ram breeds and also in maturity, which might have been expected to influence tissue, including fat, distribution.

The results indicate that breed differences in partition and distribution within and between the carcass fat depots in sheep are smaller than those between the carcass and intra-abdominal fat depots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 315 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1979. Sheep carcass evaluation—(1) measurement of composition using a standardised butcher y method. Memo. Meat Res. Inst., Langford, Bristol, No. 36.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1976a. Prediction of the lean content of lamb carcasses of different breed types. J. agric. Set, Camb. 86: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1976b. Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 1. Distribution between depots. Anim. Prod. 23: 25–34.Google Scholar
Timon, V. M. and Bichard, M. 1965. Quantitative estimates of lamb carcass composition. 3. Carcass measurements and a comparison of the predictive efficiency of sample joint composition, carcass specific gravity determinations and carcass measurements. Anim. Prod. 7: 189–201.Google Scholar
Wood, J. D., MacFie, H. J. H., Pomeroy, R. W. and Twinn, D. J. 1980. Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of type of breed and stage of maturity. Anim. Prod. 30: 135–152.Google Scholar