Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:37:21.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of the voluntary intake of food by dairy cows: 2. Lactating grazing cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. K. Curran  and
W. Holmes
M. K. Curran
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
Get access

Summary

Individual observations made in different weeks of lactation (WL) of live weight (LW, lb), milk yield (MY and FCM, lb/day), age (years) live-weight change (LWC, lb/day) and digestibility of the organic matter consumed (D, %) were used to produce models pre-dicting organic-matter intake (OMI, lb/day), digestibleorganic-matter intake (DOMI, lb/day) and faecal output (lb OM/day) in 72 grazing cows (Analysis A). Estimates of herbage availability (HA, lb dry matter/cow per day) applicable to 44 of the cows, together with the above variables were used in a similar manner (Analysis B). The multiple regression methods of analysis were applied solely to between-cow observations by selection of a single set of data from the many available for each cow.

FCM and LW0·73 gave better results than MY and LW, and together with age, were all significant variables for the prediction of the dependent variable. HA was not a significant source of variation, D was only effective in models of DOMI and faecal output, and stage of lactation was not considered a consistently useful variable. The application of the multiple regression technique to the problem of partition of nutrients and the prediction of intake is considered. Precision of prediction is discussed in terms of tolerance limits for predicted values, and it is concluded that the lack of accuracy of measurement of intake in the individual grazing cow is the major obstacle to the accurate prediction of intake in grazing cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 1970 , pp. 213 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcock, M. B. and Lovett, J. V. 1967. The electronic measuremeat of the yield of growing pastore. 1. A statistical assessment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, R. E., Hammes, R. C. Jr, Bryant, H. T., Hardison, W. A., Fontenot, J. P. and Engel, R. W. 1960. The effect of selective grazing on animal output. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr. pp. 601–606.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. 1966. Use and abuse of regression. Technometrics 8: 625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. and Proctor, R. C. 1935. Energetic efficiency of milk production and the influence of body weight thereon. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 222.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. 1960. Faecal index techniques for estimating herbage consumption of grazing animals. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr., pp. 438–442.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Langlands, J. P. and Boyne, A. W. 1962. An estimate of the energy expended for maintenance by strip grazed cows. Proc. 8th int. Congr. Anim. Prod. 3: 245–247.Google Scholar
Curran, M. K., Wimble, R. H. and Holmes, W. 1970. Prediction of the voluntary intake of food by dairy cows. 1. Stall-fed cows in late pregnancy and early lactation. Anim. Prod. 12: 195–212.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1967. Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, M. and Fox, K. A. 1959. Methods of Correlation and Regression Analysis. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute 1961. Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley. Bull. Commonw. Bur. Past. Fld Crops, No. 45.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1966. Studies of herbage consumption and milk production in grazing dairy cows. Proc. 10th int. Grassld Congr. pp. 351–355.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Corbett, J. L. and McDonald, I. 1960. The indirect estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. II. Regressions of digestibility on faecal nitrogen concentration: their determination in continuous digestibility trials and the effect of various factors on their accuracy. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55: 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Reid, G. W., Aitken, J. N. and Florence, E. 1966. The effects of grazing intensity on herbage consumption and animal production. 1. Short term effects in strip-grazed dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Reid, G. W. and Aitken, J. N. 1967. The effects of grazing intensity on herbage consumption and animal production. 2. Longer term effects in strip-grazed cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69: 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1968. The influence of the quantity of herbage offered and its digestibility on the amount eaten by grazing cattle. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 23: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W. and Curran, M. K. 1967. Feed intake of grazing cattle. V. A further study of the influence of pasture restriction combined with supplementary feeding on production per animal and per acre. Anim. Prod. 9: 313–324.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. and Jones, J. G. W. 1964. The efficiency of utilisation of fresh grass. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 23: 88–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, W. and Jones, J. G. W. 1965. The feed intake of milk cows. II. The effect of roughage quality during late pregnancy and lactation. Anim. Prod. 7: 39–51.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W. and Adeline, C. 1966. Feed intake of grazing cattle. IV. A study with milk cows of the influence of pasture restriction combined with supplementary feeding on production per animal and per acre. Anim. Prod. 8: 47–57.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W., Drake-Brockman, R. M. and White, N. 1965. Feed intake of milk cows. 1. Intake of winter rations during pregnancy and lactation and the influence of change to pasture. Anim. Prod. 7: 27–37.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. B. 1962. The maintenance requirements of New Zealand dairy cattle. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 22: 12–34.Google Scholar
Jones, J. G. W., Drake-Brockman, R. M. and Holmes, W. 1965. The feed intake of grazing cattle. III. The influence of level of milk yield. Anim. Prod. 7: 141–151.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1950. Physiological meaning of regression equations. J. appl. Physiol. 2: 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. 1961. Relative effects of environment and liveweight upon the feed requirements of sheep. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 21: 92–108.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. and Pullar, J. D. 1963. Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep. 1. Housed sheep. Anim. Prod. 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. and Reid, G. W. 1963. Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep. 2. Grazing sheep. Anim. Prod. 5: 11–16.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. and Holmes, W. 1968. Use of supplementary feeds for grazing dairy cows. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 30: 355–361.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. and Holmes, W. 1969. The influence of flexible and rigid grazing management and of supplementary feed on output per cow and per hectare. Anim. Prod. 11: 161–172.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. and Terry, R. A. 1966. Studies on herbage digestibility by an in vitro method. Outl. Agric. 5: 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. 1956. Intake and utilisation of pasture by grazing dairy cattle. Proc. 7th int. Grassld Congr., New Zealand, pp. 196–204.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. 1961. The nutritional requirements of dairy cattle. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 21: 64–78.Google Scholar
Wood, T. B. and Capstick, J. W. 1926. The maintenance requirements of the adult sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 16: 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar