Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:02:43.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the effect of exposure to a boar on the development of the reproductive system of immature gilts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. S. Walton
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry ScienceUniversity of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Eight groups of six Yorkshire gilts were either exposed (BE) or not exposed (NE) to a mature boar at 160 days of age. These groups of gilts were slaughtered at 160, 165, 170 and 180 days of age for examination of their reproductive tracts.

NE gilts remained pre-pubertal from 160 to 180 days, with uterine weights of 121·6 g and 148·0 g respectively. Boar exposure induced ovulation in three out of five gilts by day 170 and in five out of six gilts by day 180. Uterine weight increased in BE gilts from 121·6 g at 160 days to 343·6 g, 298·0 g and 535·6 g by days 165, 170 and 180 respectively. This was accompanied by an increase in the number of large ovarian follicles (≤ 6 mm in diameter) from 0 at 160 days to 9·0 at 165 and 4·2 at 170 days.

These results confirm the potent stimulatory effect of boar exposure on puberty in gilts and suggest the use of ovarian status and uterine weight at slaughter 10 days after stimulation as a reliable indicator of the response of the pre-pubertal gilt to environmental change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aherne, F. X., Christopherson, R. J., Thompson, J. R. and Harden, R. T. 1976. Factors affecting the onset of puberty, post-weaning estrus and blood hormone levels of Lacombe gilts. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 56: 681692.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1970. The effect of the presence of a boar on the attainment of puberty in gilts. J. Reprod. Fert. 23: 435440.Google Scholar
Christenson, R. K. 1981. Influence of confinement and season of the year on puberty and estrous activity of gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 52: 821830.Google Scholar
Dyck, G. W. and Swierstra, E. E. 1983. Growth of the reproductive tract of the gilt from birth to puberty. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 8187.Google Scholar
Helwig, J. T. and Council, K. A. 1979. SAS User's Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. 1982. Factors affecting the natural attainment of puberty in the gilt. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 117138. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. and Cole, D. J. A. 1976. Reproduction n i the gilt. 2. The influence of gilt age at boar introduction on the attainment of puberty. Anim. Prod. 23: 8994.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Hughes, P. E. 1979. The influence of age at first boar contact on puberty attainment in the gilt. Anim. Prod. 29: 231238.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Hughes, P. E. 1980. A note on the influence of boar effect component stimuli on puberty attainment in the gilt. Anim. Prod. 31: 209211.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N., Hughes, P. E. and Booth, W. D. 1983. The influence of boar-related odours on puberty attainment in gilts. Anim. Prod. 36: 131136.Google Scholar
Paterson, A. M. and Lindsay, D. R. 1980. Induction of puberty in gilts. 1. The effects of rearing conditions on reproductive performance and response to mature boars after early puberty. Anim. Prod. 31: 291297.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P. 1980. Mating behaviour of the pig. In Behaviour in Relation to Reproduction Management and Welfare of Farm Animals (ed Edey, T. E. and Lynch, J. J.) Reviews in Rural Science No. 4, pp. 7578. University of New England Press, Armidale.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. H. and Savage, J. S. 1978. Age at puberty and ovulation rate in gilts in confinement as influenced by exposure to a boar. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 11411144.Google Scholar