Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:42:53.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the accuracy of an ultrasonic technique for selecting cattle of different breeds for slaughter at equal fatness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. Kempster  and
M. G. Owen
A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
M. G. Owen
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Get access

Abstract

In the first phase of the Meat and Livestock Commission's beef breed evaluation programme, cattle were slaughtered at a fixed subcutaneous fat percentage in carcass. Slaughter point was determined from fat areas measured over the m. longissimus at the 10th and 13th ribs by the Scanogram ultrasonic machine.

The accuracy of the slaughter procedure was examined using data for 1367 cattle from the first 3 years of the programme. Subcutaneous fat percentage predicted from the ultrasonic measurements was compared with the percentage estimated by visual assessment of carcass fat cover. The s.d. of the difference between the two was 1·65.

Data for a subset of 313 cattle were used to examine the relationships between the ultrasonically measured fat areas and actual subcutaneous fat percentage obtained by dissection. The residual s.d. for the prediction of subcutaneous fat within breed and production system was 1-18.

The level of accuracy achieved was considered to be satisfactory within the context of the beef breed evaluation programme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 113 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Smith, R. J. 1980. The evaluation of a standardized commercial cutting technique for determining breed differences in carcass composition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 95: 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A., Jones, D. W. and Owen, M. G. 1980. Prediction of body composition of live cattle using two ultrasonic machines of differing complexity—a report of four separate trials. J. agric. Sci., Camb. In press.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1978a. Evaluation of breeds and crosses for beef production. Beef Improvement Serv. Newsl., No. 34. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1978b. Breed differences ni carcass composition results from MLC Beef Breed Evaluation at Ingliston and Sutton Bonington. Mktg Serv. Newsl., No. 18. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley.Google Scholar