Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:49:30.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moist barley preserved with propionic acid in the diet of the growing pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. R. English
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
J. H. Topps
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
D. G. Dempster
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Summary

The feeding value of three forms of acid-treated moist barley, viz. 26 % moisture and either rolled or plate-milled, and 29 % moisture plate-milled, was compared with that of dried hammer-milled barley for growing pigs from 23 to 87 kg live weight. Two feeding experiments were undertaken, one in which individual pigs were given the same amount of dry matter from all the diets, while in the other, groups of pigs were fed ad libitum. Digestibility of the diet was determined in a third experiment.

In both feeding experiments differences between treatments in efficiency of utilization of dry matter in the feed were significant (P<0·05), that for the diet containing dried barley being approximately 5% better than the other three. There were no significant differences between treatments in intake of dry matter, rate of growth and carcass quality of the pigs. However, pigs fed on dried barley apparently grew more rapidly than those given any of the acid-treated moist barleys. Differences in digestibility of the diets were very small and not significant except for crude protein. Differences in digestibility of protein (P<0·05), however, were not consistent with differences in efficiency of conversion of dry matter in the feed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cole, D. J. A., Dean, G. W. and Luscombe, J. R. 1970. Single cereal diets for bacon pigs. 2. The effect of methods of storage and preparation of barley on performance and carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 12: 16.Google Scholar
Gowland, R. 1968. The feeding of propionic acid treated moist grain to pigs. Report No. 2002. B.P. Chemicals {U.K.) Ltd. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1967. High level cereal diets for the growing-finishing pig. 1. The effect of cereal preparation and water level on the performance of pigs fed high levels of wheat. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 269274.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1970. Some effects of including differently processed barley in the diet of the growing pig. 1. Growth rate, food conversion efficiency, digestibility and rate of passage through the gut. Anim. Prod. 12: 139150.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. M., Denerley, H., Stewart, C. S. and Elsley, F. W. H. 1971. Moist barley for growing pigs: some effects of storage method and processing. Anim. Prod. 13: 547556.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Mcdonald, I. and Calder, A. F. C. 1960. Some further observations upon the effects of varying the plane of feeding for pigs between weaning and bacon weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 54: 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, A., Bengtsson, A., Kivi, E. and Middelsen, K. 1972. [Stage for harvesting and the nutritive value of barley.] Beretn. Forsgeslab., No. 395.Google Scholar
Perez-Aleman, S., Dempster, D. G., English, P. R. and Topps, J. H. 1971. Moist barley preserved with acid in the diet of the growing pig. Anim. Prod. 13: 271277.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Evans, R. E. and Menzies, A. W. 1932. The value of oats in the nutrition of swine. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 22: 657667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar