Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:42:28.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of winter nutrition, grazing system and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving Hereford × Friesian cows and their calves 1. Winter nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. D. Baker ,
Y. L. P. Le Du  and
J. M. Barker
R. D. Baker
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Y. L. P. Le Du
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
J. M. Barker
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

In three experiments the effects of giving Hereford × Friesian cows 61 to 64 MJ/day of metabolizable energy in the last 8 weeks of pregnancy, followed by either 49 to 56 (L) or 85 to 100 (H) MJ/day for the first 8 weeks of lactation, were determined. A further comparison was made in experiment 3, in which energy intakes were restricted to 46 and 64 MJ/day (M) in the two periods respectively. The L and M groups had a similar average weight loss of approximately 55 kg over winter whereas the H groups maintained their weight. The L and M treatments had a negligible effect on milk production at 3 weeks post calving but they caused a significant depression at 6 weeks in experiments 2 and 3. Milk energy and protein concentrations were reduced in all three experiments. Calf growth was similar on both treatments in experiment 1 but was 9 to 13% lower in experiments 2 and 3 for the L and M groups compared with the H group. Reproductive performance was not significantly affected. There was a substantial increase in milk production for all groups on turnout to grazing. This was greater for the L and M groups so that their summer milk production was almost equal to that of the H group. Cows from L and M groups gained more weight at pasture. By the end of the trials cows and calves from all treatments had similar weights except in experiment 3, when cows from the L and M treatments were still lighter than those from the H treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 213 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Baker, A. A. 1968. Oestrus and ovarian activity in lactating Sahiwal-Shorthorn beef cows in south-eastern Queensland. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7: 172–176.Google Scholar
Baker, H. K. 1975. Grassland systems for beef production from dairy bred and beef calves. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2: 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Ball, C., Kilkenny, J. B. and Walshe, A. 1972. Suckled calves. Beef Prod. Handb., No. 3. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Barker, J. M. and Le du, Y. L. P. 1982. The influence of winter nutrition, grazing system and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving Hereford × Friesian cows and their calves. 2. Grazing system and stocking rate. Anim. Prod. 34: 225–237.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. 1972. Milk composition. In Handbuch der Tierndhrung (ed. Lenkeit, W., Breirem, K. and Crasemann, E.), Vol. 2, pp. 259–265. Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Bond, J., Wiltbank, J. N., Warwick, E. J., Lehmann, R. P. and Kinney, T. B. 1964. Feed intake and milk production of beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 901 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J. and Smith, T. 1969. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VIII. Effect on milk production of level of feeding at two stages of the lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72: 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1971a. Single-suckled beef production. 1. Influence of stocking rate during the grazing season, creep grazing of the calf and double-suckling on liveweight changes and milk production of the cows. Ir. J. agric. Res. 10: 287–295.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. 1971b. Single-suckled beef production. 2. Influence of stocking rate during the grazing season, creep grazing of the calf and double-suckling on calf performance. Ir. J. agric. Res. 10: 297–305.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. and Bath, I. H. 1976a. Single-suckled beef production. 3. Effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy on cow performance. Ir. J. agric. Res. 15: 157–167.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J. and Bath, I. H. 1976b. Single-suckled beef production. 4. Effect of plane of nutrition during late pregnancy on subsequent calf performance. Ir. J. agric. Res. 15: 169–176.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1970. Feeding dairy concentrates to maximum advantage under Irish conditions. In Dairy Nutrition, pp. 85–95. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Hight, G. K. 1966. The effect of undernutrition in late pregnancy on beef cattle production. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 9: 479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hight, G. K. 1968a. Plane of nutrition effects in late pregnancy and during lactation on beef cows and their calves to weaning. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 11: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hight, G. K. 1968b. A comparison of the effects of three nutritional levels in late pregnancy on beef cows and their calves. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 11: 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Whitelaw, A. and MacDonald, A. J. 1980. The influence of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of spring-calving suckler cows and their calves. Anim. Prod. 30: 315–325.Google Scholar
Jordan, W. A., Lister, E. E. and Rowlands, G. J. 1968. Effect of planes of nutrition on wintering pregnant beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, D. R. 1970. The influence of undernutrition on reproduction in the cow. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 38: 359–372.Google Scholar
Le du, Y. L. P., Baker, R. D. and Barker, J. M. 1978. The use of short-term secretion rate measurements for estimating the milk production of suckler cows. J. Dairy Res. 45: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Edwards, R. A., Somerville, S. H. and Jolly, G. M. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of beef cows. Anim. Prod. 29: 293–303.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. E. and Barber, W. P. 1980. The adviser's approach to predicting the metabolizable energy value of feeds for ruminants. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition—1979 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 93–106. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, A. M. 1977. The influence of plane of nutrition immediately post-calving on the performance of beef cows. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 37: 103–108.Google Scholar
Pope, L. S. 1967. Winter feeding and reproduction in cows. In Factors Affecting Calf Crop (ed. Cunha, T. J., Warnick, A. C. and Koger, M.), pp. 32–43. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Fa.Google Scholar
Powell, T. L. 1972. Intensification of the spring-calving single-suckler herd. Anim. Prod. 14: 77–84.Google Scholar
Rowett Research Institute. 1976. Feedingstuffs Evaluation Unit. First Report 1975. Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Scales, G. H. and Stevenson, J. R. 1976. Nutrition of the beef breeding cow. In Proc. 28th Ruakura Fmrs' Conf., Hamilton, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
Sparke, E. J. and Lamond, D. R. 1968. The influence of supplementary feeding on growth and fertility of beef heifers grazing natural pastures. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 8: 425–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 1215–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, S. J. and Nash, M. J. 1960. The Conservation of Grass and Forage Crops. 2nd ed.Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wiltbank, J. N., Bond, J., Warwick, E. J., Davis, R. E., Cook, A. C., Reynolds, W. L. and Hazen, M. W. 1965. Influence of total feed and protein intake on reproductive performance of the beef female through second calving. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric, No. 1314.Google Scholar
Wiltbank, J. N., Rowden, W. W., Ingalls, J. E., Gregory, K. E. and Koch, R. M. 1962. Effect of energy level on reproductive phenomena of mature Hereford cows. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltbank, J. N., Rowden, W. W., Ingalls, J. E. and Zimmermann, D. R. 1964. Influence of post-partum energy level on reproductive performance of Hereford cows restricted in energy intake prior to calving. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1049–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, D. F. and YOUNG, I. M. 1974. Artificial insemination of progestin (SC21009)-treated cattle at predetermined times. Vet. Rec. 95: 503–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed