Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:24:30.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Housing system and welfare of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C. Tripaldi ,
G. De Rosa ,
F. Grasso ,
G. M. Terzano  and
F. Napolitano
C. Tripaldi
Affiliation:
Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Via Salaria 31, 00016 Monterotondo (Roma), Italy
G. De Rosa*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy
F. Grasso
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy
G. M. Terzano
Affiliation:
Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Via Salaria 31, 00016 Monterotondo (Roma), Italy
F. Napolitano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via N. Sauro 85, 85100 Potenza, Italy
*
† Contact for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-eight buffalo cows were used to evaluate the effect of housing system on a range of behavioural and physiological variables. Fourteen cows were group-housed in a loose open-sided barn with a concrete floor and 10 m2 per head as space allowance (group IS). Fourteen others were group-housed in a similar barn but they could also benefit from an outdoor yard with 500 m2 per head as space allowance, free access to potholes for wallowing and spontaneous vegetation (group TS). Animals were subjected to six sessions of instantaneous scan sampling at 10-day intervals. Behavioural variables were expressed as proportions of subjects observed in each category of posture and activity. Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) was used to perform a skin test based on non-specific delayed type hypersensitivity, whereas 20 mg of ovalbumin were injected subcutaneously to evaluate humoral immune response. Blood samples for evaluation of cortisol concentration were collected immediately prior to exogenous porcine ACTH injection and 1, 2 and 4 h after. The metabolic status of the animals and milk production were also monitored. The proportion of idling animals was higher in group IS than in group TS (P < 0.001). More IS buffalo cows were observed eating at the manger than TS animals (P < 0.001). A higher proportion of TS animals were observed in the sun (P < 0.001). Grazing and bathing activities were recorded only for TS animals. Our findings suggest that buffalo cows kept in intensive conditions and having no access to ample yards and potholes may extend their periods of idling with negative effects on the state of welfare. Immune responses, metabolite concentrations and milk production were not affected by treatment, whereas cortisol levels were higher in IS animals (P < 0.05). The provision of a housing system similar to natural conditions was able to improve the welfare of buffalo cows as indicated by the expression of some species-specific natural behaviours. Such conditions were also associated with lower adrenal cortex response to ACTH injection, possibly as a consequence of the higher degree of initiative allowed to TS cows.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourbuffaloeshousingimmune response
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , June 2004 , pp. 477 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, J. L., Hemsworth, P. H., Cronin, G. M., Newman, E. A., McCallum, T. H. and Chilton, D. 1992. Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 207–220.Google Scholar
Chaplin, S. J., Tierney, G., Stockwell, C., Logue, D. N. and Kelly, M. 2000. An evaluation of mattresses and mats in two dairy units. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantzer, R., Mormede, P., Bluthe, R. M. and Soissons, J. 1983. The effect of different housing conditions on behavioural and adrenocortical reactions in veal calves. Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement 23: 501–508.Google Scholar
Edmonson, A. J., Lean, I. J., Weaver, L. D., Farver, T. and Webster, G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1993. Second report on priorities for research and development in farm animal welfare. MAFF, Tolworth, UK.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. D., Crowe, M. A., Prendiville, D. J. and Enright, W. J. 1997. Indoor space allowance: effects on growth, behaviour, adrenal and immune responses of finishing beef heifers. Animal Science 64: 53–62.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. F. and Broom, D. M. 1990. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Friend, T. H., Dellmeier, G. R. and Gbur, E. E. 1985. Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. I. Physiology. Journal of Animal Science 60: 1095–1101.Google Scholar
Friend, T. H., Gwazdauskas, F. C. and Polan, C. E. 1979. Change in adrenal response from free stall competition. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 768–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grasso, F., De Rosa, G., Marsico, I., Napolitano, F., Migliori, G. and Bordi, A. 2003. Welfare of buffalo heifers in relation to feeding and space allowance. Proceedings of the A. S. P. A. 15th congress, Parma, Italy, 18-20 June. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2: (suppl. 1) 148–150.Google Scholar
Grasso, F., Napolitano, F., De Rosa, G., Quarantelli, T., Serpe, L. and Bordi, A. 1999. Effect of pen size on behavioral, endocrine, and immune responses of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. Journal of Animal Science 77: 2039–2046.Google Scholar
Hanlon, A. J., Rhind, S. M., Reid, H. W., Burrells, C., Lawrence, A. B., Milne, J. A. and McMillen, S. R. 1994. Relationship between immune response, liveweight gain, behaviour and adrenal function in red deer (Cervus elaphus) calves derived from wild and farmed stock, maintained at two housing densities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbutz, M. S. and Lightman, S. L. 1992. Stress and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: acute, chronic and immunological activation. Journal of Endocrinology 134: 327–329.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation. 1990. Determination of milk fat, protein and lactose content. Guide for the operation of mid-infra-red instruments. International Dairy Federation (FIL-IDF standard no. 141B), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation. 1995. Enumeration of somatic cells. International Dairy Federation (FIL-IDF standard no. 148A), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Mallard, B. A., Dekkers, J. C., Ireland, M. J., Leslie, K. E., Sharif, S., Lacey VanKampen, C., Wagter, L. and Wilkie, B. N. 1998. Alteration in immune responsiveness during the peripartum period and its ramification on dairy cow and calf health. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 585–595.Google Scholar
Maton, A. and Daelemans, J. 1989. Modern housing of cattle and their welfare. In Agricultural engineering, proceedings of the 11th international congress on agricultural engineering, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 921–925.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. P. and Paterson, A. M. 1993. The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 11–28.Google Scholar
Rushen, J. 1991. Commentry. Problems associated with the interpretation of physiological data in the assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 381–386.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1990. User’s guide: statistics. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Vaarst, M., Alban, L., Mogensen, L., Thamsborg, S. M. and Kristensen, E. S. 2001. Health and welfare in Danish dairy cattle in the transition to organic production: problems, priorities and perspectives. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14: 367–390.Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F. 1993. The concept of animal boredom and its relationship to stereotyped behaviour. In Stereotypic animal behaviour: fundamental and application to welfare (ed. Lawrence, A. and Rushen, J.), pp. 65–95. CABI International, Wallingford.Google Scholar