Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:15:33.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbage intake and performance of grazing ewes and of their lambs when weaned at 6, 8, 10 or 14 weeks of age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Gibb
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
T. T. Treacher
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
V. S. Shanmugalingam
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Twin lambs grazing with their dams at herbage allowances of 30 or 60 gdry matter per kg live weight per day (low and high, respectively) were weaned at 6, 8, 10 or 14 weeks of age. After weaning, the lambs were given a herbage allowance of 160 g dry matter per kg live weight per day.

Ewes on the low allowance ate less herbage, produced less milk and lost more weight than those on the high allowance. The lambs on the low allowance were lighter at weaning than those on the high allowance (137 v. 168, 16·2 v. 20·5, 17·9 v. 24·2 and 21·9 v. 30·4 kg at 6, 8, 10 and 14 weeks respectively).

Lambs weaned from ewes on the low allowance grew more slowly than the unweaned lambs when removed at 6 weeks, but not when weaned at 8 and 10 weeks of age. Weaning lambs from ewes on the high allowance reduced their growth rates at all weaning ages, despite the weaned lambs being grazed at an allowance which would not limit their intake of herbage. The intake of herbage per unit live weight by weaned lambs reached its maximum at approximately 8 weeks of age. After weaning, intake was higher for lambs from ewes on the low allowance than for those on the high allowance (38 v. 33 g organic matter per kg live weight per day). Lambs slaughtered at 17 weeks of age were heavier from the high allowance than from the low allowance. However, after 17 weeks of age the remaining lambs from the low allowance grew more rapidly than those from the high allowance, and when slaughtered at 25 weeks of age had similar weights. Treatments had no effect on the weights of the body components or carcass dimensions independent of their effect on empty-body weights at slaughter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnicoat, C. R., Murray, F. P., Roberts, E. M. and Wilson, G. S. 1957. Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. Parts V-XI. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48: 935.Google Scholar
Brown, T. H. 1964. The early weaning of lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63: 191204.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. A. 1954. Early weaning of lambs on hill country. N.Z. Jl. Agric. 89: 471476.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1976. The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of lambs grazing perennial ryegrass and red clover swards. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 355365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1978. The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of ewes and their twin lambs grazing perennial ryegrass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 90: 139147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1980. The effect of ewe body condition at lambing on the performance of ewes and their lambs at pasture. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 95: 631640.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Avis, P. R. D., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1976. Prediction of the lean content of lamb carcasses of different breed types. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 2334.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. and Donald, G. E. 1975. The intakes and growth rates of grazing Border Leicester × Merino lambs weaned at 21, 49 and 77 days. Anim. Prod. 21: 175181.Google Scholar
McCance, I. 1959. The determination of milk yield in the Merino ewe. Aust. J. agric. Res. 10: 839853.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. and Verges, J. B. 1952. Effects of the plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. Part II. Effects on lambs of 301b. carcass weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42: 93149.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D. and Gibb, M. J. 1977. Th e use of corticosteroid to synchronise parturition in sheep. Vet. Rec. 100: 491492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D. and Gibb, M. J. 1979. The effect of milk intake on the intake of cut and grazed herbage by lambs. Anim. Prod. 29: 5367.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Penning, Ines M. and Treacher, T. T. 1977. The effect of temperature and method of feeding on the digestibility of two milk substitutes and on the performance of lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 579589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, J. G. and Walters, D. E. 1976. Analysing data with repeated observations on each experimental unit. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 423432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanmugalingam, V. S., Gibb, M. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1981. Use of an improved technique to analyse repeated measurements of live weight from an experiment involving sequential weaning treatments. Anim. Prod. 33: 233239.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. GrassldSoc. 18: 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. 1960. The post-natal growth of the visceral organs of the lamb. Part II. The effect of diet on growth rate, with particular reference to the parts of the alimentary tract. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55: 127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. and Coombe, J. B. 1961. The development of rumen function in the lamb. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 661680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar