Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:17:53.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and carcass characteristics of desert goat kids and their temperate cross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Bello  and
S. A. Babiker
A. Bello
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Institute of Animal Production, University of Khartoum, Khartoum North, PO Box 32, Sudan
S. A. Babiker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Institute of Animal Production, University of Khartoum, Khartoum North, PO Box 32, Sudan
Get access

Abstract

Crossbreeding of desert goat does with the temperate Saanen x Toggenburg buck was found to result in a significant increase in the daily live-weight gain and the empty body weight of their progeny slaughtered at about 30 kg live weight when compared with purebred desert goat kids (P < 0·001). Food intake did not differ between the two types of kids, but live-weight food conversion efficiency was significantly superior in crossbred kids (P < 0·05).

Carcass weight and killing-out proportion tended to be greater in the crossbred kids reflecting lower weights of head, skin, internal organs and gut fill. Breed types did not differ in the weights of individual wholesale cuts. Carcass dissection revealed significantly higher muscle proportion (P < 0·05), significantly lower fat proportion (P < 0·01) and higher muscle: bone ratio in the crossbred kids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 231 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Devendra, C. and Burns, M. 1983. Goat Production in the Tropics. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organisation. 1979. FAO Production Yearbook. Vol. 32. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome.Google Scholar
Gaili, E. S. E., Ghanem, Y. S. and Mukhtar, A. M. S. 1972. A comparative study of some carcass characteristics of Sudan desert sheep and goats. Animal Production 14: 351–357.Google Scholar
Goll, D. E., Hazel, L. N. and Kline, E. A. 1961. Relationship between some beef carcass measurements and yield of wholesale cuts. Journal of Animal Science 20: 264–267.Google Scholar
Louca, A. and Hancock, J. 1977. Genotype by environment interactions for postweaning growth in the Damascus breed of goat. Journal of Animal Science 44: 927–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P. and Louca, A. 1979. Note on some factors influencing post-weaning performance of purebred and crossbred lambs. Animal Production 29: 415–418.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1976. Cutting and preparing of lamb and pork. Technical Bulletin No. 24. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture. 1982. Current Agricultural Statistics Vol. 1. Department of Statistics, Khartoum, Sudan.Google Scholar
Mukundan, G. and Bhat, P. N. 1978. Genetic parameters of production traits in Malabari goats and their crosses with Saanen and Alpine. XIV International Congress of Genetics, Moscow. Contributed paper sessions. Abstracts. Part I. Continuation Sections 13–20, p. 526. (Animal Breeding Abstracts (1979) 47: 323).Google Scholar
Mukundan, G., Khan, B. and Bhat, P. N. 1982. A note on the growth curve in Malabari and their Saanen half breds. Indian Journal of Animal Science 52: 1112–1114.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1975. Intensive Beef Production. 2nd ed.Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed.Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar