Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:24:32.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic components of carcass and meat quality traits in Meishan and Large White pigs and their reciprocal crosses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. J. Serra ,
M. Ellis  and
C. S. Haley
J. J. Serra
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
M. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
C. S. Haley
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

The prospect that genes from the Chinese Meishan pig will be used to improve reproductive performance of European pigs requires that the Meishan is evaluated for traits of economic importance and the genetics of any breed effects investigated. Entire male and female pigs of four genotypes; purebred Meishan (MS) and Large White (LW) pigs and both reciprocal Fl crossbred genotypes (MS ♂ × LW ♀and LW ♂ × MS ♀), were fed ad libitum and slaughtered at about 70 kg. After slaughter, carcass weight, dimensions and conformation were recorded and fat depths at the shoulder, mid back and loin were measured on the carcass, together with fat depths and eye muscle dimensions recorded on a section cut at the last rib position. Drip loss, muscle reflectance and pH were measured and subjective assessments of fat firmness, fat separation, muscle marbling and muscle colour were made. Genotypic means and genetic crossbreeding effects (direct additive and heterosis effects and maternal additive effects) were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood procedures. When compared with the LW, MS carcasses had a similar killing-out proportion but were shorter with a poorer conformation. MS carcasses had substantially greater fat depths and reduced eye muscle dimensions in comparison with the LW. Differences between genotypes for fat depths and muscle dimensions were largely controlled by direct additive gene action, there was little evidence of direct heterosis and hence Fl crosses were intermediate between the purebreds. Significant genotype × sex interaction meant that genotypic differences for these traits were much greater in females than in males. Significant direct additive genetic differences between female genotypes were found for fat firmness, fat separation and drip loss, but these effects may in part have been a consequence of subcutaneous fat depth differences between genotypes. The degree of marbling was greater in MS females than in females of the other three genotypes and these genotypic differences did not seem to be associated with subcutaneous fat depth. Muscle from MS males was darker in colour with a lower reflectance than that from LW males. Genotype × sex interaction was such that genotypic differences for meat and fat quality traits differed between sexes.

Keywords

carcass qualitycrossbreedingLarge Whitemeat qualityMeishanpigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 117 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bidanel, J. P. 1989. [Study of strategies of the value of the Meishan pig breed used in crossbreeding. 3. Comparative evaluation of different crossbreeding systems.] Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 21:361–366.Google Scholar
Bidanel, J. P., Caritez, J. C., Fleury, J., Gruand, J. and Legault, C. 1989a. [Study of strategies of the value of the Meishan pig breed used in crossbreeding. 2. Estimation of crossbreeding parameters for production traits.] Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 21: 353–360.Google Scholar
Bidanel, J. P., Caritez, J. C. and Legault, C. 1989b. Estimation of crossbreeding parameters between Large White and Meishan porcine breeds. I. Reproductive performance. Génétique, Sélection, Evolution 21: 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidanel, J. P., Caritez, J. C. and Legault, C. 1990a. Parameters du croisement entre les races porcines Large White et Meishan. Perspectives de valorisation de la race Meishan en elevage intensif. Symposium sur le pore chinois (ed. Molenat, M. and Legault, C.), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, France, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
Bidanel, J. P., Caritez, J. C. and Legault, C. 1990b. Estimation of crossbreeding parameters between Large White and Meishan porcine breeds. II. Growth before weaning and growth of females during the growing and reproductive periods. Genetique, Selection, Evolution 22: 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, N. D. 1990. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass traits, meat and eating quality traits in pigs. Livestock Production Science 26:119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, P. L. 1983. A highly prolific pig breed of China — the Taihu pig. Parts I and II. Pig News and Information 4: 407–425.Google Scholar
Cheng, P. L. 1984. A highly prolific pig breed of China — the Taihu pig. Parts III and IV. Pig News and Information 5: 13–18.Google Scholar
Ellis, M., Lympany, C., Haley, C. S. and Brown, I. 1990. The influence of the Meishan breed on the eating quality of fresh pigmeat. Proceedings of the 4th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. XV, pp. 557–560.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1989. GENSTAT 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haley, C. S., Archibald, A., Andersson, L., Bosnia, A. A., Davies, M., Fredholm, M., Geldermann, H., Groenen, M., Gustavsson, I., Ollivier, L., Tucker, E. M. and Van de Weghe, A. 1990a. The pig gene mapping project — PiGMaP. Proceedings of the 4th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. XIII, pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
Haley, C. S., Ashworth, C. J., Lee, G. J., Wilmut, I., Aitken, R. P. and Ritchie, W. 1990b. British studies of the genetics of prolificacy in the Meishan pig. In Symposium sur le pore chinois (ed. Molenat, M. and Legault, C.), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, France, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
Haley, C. S., D'Agaro, E. and Ellis, M. 1992. Genetic components of growth and ultrasonic fat depth traits in Meishan and Large White pigs and their reciprocal crosses. Animal Production 54:105–115.Google Scholar
Haley, C. S. and Lee, G. J. 1990. Genetic components of litter size in Meishan and Large White pigs and their crosses. Proceedings of the 4th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. XV, pp. 458–461.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Dilworth, A. W., Evans, D. G. and Fisher, K. D. 1986. The effects of fat thickness and sex on pig meat quality with special reference to the problems associated with overleanness. 1. Butcher and consumer panel results. Animal Production 43: 517–533.Google Scholar
Legault, C. and Caritez, J. C. 1983. [Experiments with Chinese pigs in France. I. Reproductive performance of purebreds and crossbreds.] Génétique, Sélection, Évolution 15: 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legault, C., Sellier, P., Caritez, J. C., Dando, P. and Gruand, J. 1985. [Experiments with Chinese pigs in France. II. Production performance of crosses with European breeds.] Génétique, Sélection, Evolution 17:133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D. G. 1990. Potential of Chinese pig breeds to improve pork production efficiency in the USA. Animal Breeding Abstacts 58: 347–369.Google Scholar
Mather, K. and Jinks, J. L. 1971. Biometrical genetics. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oishi, T., Tanaka, K., Otani, T. and Tamada, S. 1989. Genetic variations of blood groups and biochemical polymorphisms in Meishan pigs. Bulletin of the National Institute of the Animal Industries (Japan) 48:1–10.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1971. The recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poilvet, D., Bonneau, M., Caritez, J. C. and Legault, C. 1990. Carcass tissue composition in Meishan (MS), Large White (LW) and Fl (MS × LW) pigs. In Symposium sur le pore chinois (ed. Molenat, M. and Legault, C.), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, France, pp. 237–238.Google Scholar
Schwörer, D., Blum, J. and Rebsamen, A. 1980. Parameters of meat quality and stress resistance of pigs. Livestock Production Science 7: 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraille, C. 1990. The sensory properties of pork meat produced from Chinese cross-breed animals. In Symposium sur le pore chinois (ed. Molenat, M. and Legault, C.), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, France, pp. 243–254.Google Scholar
Touraille, C., Monin, G. and Legault, C. 1989. Eating quality of meat from European × Chinese crossbred pigs. Meat Science 25:177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed