Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:47:30.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food intake, milk production and growth of kids of local, multipurpose goats grazing on dry season natural Sahelian rangeland in Mali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

M. Sangaré  and
V. S. Pandeyt
M. Sangaré
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

A study was carried out in the dry season, from October 1993 to May 1994 at an institutional farm in Niono (14º5’N, 6ºE, 295 m), on the Sahelian border of Mali with a semi-arid climate. Thirty-four local Sahelian goats in their first to fifth lactation weighing about 27 kg were used. Eleven of them suckled twin and 23 suckled single kids. The does were herded on natural rangeland for 8 to 9 h/day and received no food supplements. Dry season forage mass, intake and nutritive value of diets selected by goats, milk yield and effects on kids’ growth were measured.

The vegetation cover consisted of a herbaceous stratum dominated by annual gramineae plants and a woody stratum composed of 26 species of plants, whose relative abundance varied according to the topography and soil type. The goats spent between 0·126 (early dry season) and 0·004 (late dry season) of grazing time on herbaceous cover and the remaining time on consuming leaves, flowers and fruits of woody plants. The phytomass decreased as the dry season advanced. However, nutrient intake was relatively constant during the course of the study period, as the goats compensated for low biomass by walking more and grazing larger areas and for longer periods. On average, goats selected diets with 121 g crude protein and 7·6 MJ metabolizable energy per kg dry matter.

The milk yield and milk fat were measured weekly for 29 weeks but data for only 12 weeks are interpreted and discussed. Mean daily actual and fat-corrected milk (40 g fat per kg milk) production for the first 12 weeks of lactation was 692 (s.e. 139) g and 627 (s.e. 73) g respectively. The milk yield was maximum in the 1st week of lactation followed by a gradual decline. Milk yield was affected by litter size, number of lactation, weight and age of does at parturition. The does with twin kids produced significantly more milk (762 (s.e. 110) g/day) than the does with singles (656 (s.e. 158) g/day) (P < 0·05). The milk yield increased from the first lactation (542 (s.e. 49) g/day) to the third lactation (739 (s.e. 49) g/day) (P < 0·05) with no difference between the third and fifth lactation. Does over 27 kg produced more milk than those under 27 kg (P < 0·001) and does over 2·5 years produced more milk than younger does (P < 0·01). Milk fat was inversely related to milk production. Kids born as singles were heavier (2194 (s.e. 76) g) than those born as twins (1966 (s.e. 78) g) (P < 0·05). The kid growth rate was affected by birth weight (P < 0·001) and milk yield of dams (P < 0·01). Within litter size (single or twins), sex had no significant effect on the growth rate of kids, however the singles grew faster than twins (P < 0·001) throughout the 12 weeks of measurement. Single kids were 1·41 times as heavy as twins at 12 weeks.

It is concluded that, the milk yield of does and weight gain of kids under the precarious feeding conditions of the study indicate that the local goats monitored were adapted to local harsh conditions. Nutrition has been regarded as the main constraint to goat production from the range in the dry season. Further specific studies are needed to overcome the dry season nutritional stress and to improve goat production.

Keywords

food intakegoatskidsmilk yieldrangelandsSahelian zone
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , August 2000 , pp. 165 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinsoyinu, A. O., Tewe, O. O., N’Gere, L. O. and M’Ba, A.U. 1981. Milk composition and yield of the Red Sokoto (Maradi) goat in Nigeria. Tropical Animal Production 6: 186.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. and Manley, T. R. 1984. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 2. Quantitative digestion of carbohydrates and proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 51: 493–504.Google Scholar
Becker, K. and Lohrmann, J. 1992. Feed selection by goats on tropical semi-humid rangeland. Small Ruminant Research 8: 285–298.Google Scholar
Belsky, A. J. 1989. Landscape patterns in a semi-arid ecosystem in East Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 17: 265–270.Google Scholar
Blackburn, H. D. and Field, C. R. 1982. The performance of Somalia Blackhead sheep and Galla goat in Nothern Kenya. In Integrated Project in Aridlands (IPAL); technical report E-8, programme on Man and the Biosphere (MAB). UNESCO.Google Scholar
Breman, H. and de Ridder, N. 1991. Manuel sur les pâturages tropicaux. ACCT-CTA, Paris.Google Scholar
Castellanos, R. and Valencia, Z. 1982. Quantitative and qualitative study of milk production of the Pelibuey sheep. Tropical Animal Production 7: 232–240.Google Scholar
Charray, J., Coulomb, J., Haumesser, J. B., Planchenault, D. and Pugliese, P. L. 1980. Les petits ruminants d’Afrique Centrale et d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Synthèses des connaissances actuelles. IEMVT, Ministère de la Coopération, Paris.Google Scholar
Cissé, M. I. 1992. Relevé du peuplement ligneux et évaluation du potentiel fourrager aérien des parcours. Document de travail, Institut d’Economie Rurale, Bamako, Mali.Google Scholar
Coughenour, M. B., Coppock, D. L. and Ellis, J. E. 1990. Herbaceous forage variability in an arid pastoral region of Kenya: importance of topographic and rainfall gradients. Journal of Arid Environments 19: 147–159.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Burn, M. 1983. Goat production in the tropics. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Slough, UK.Google Scholar
Dicko, M. S. and Sangaré, M. 1984. Le comportement alimentaire des ruminants domestiques en zone sahélienne. In Proceedings of the second international rangeland congress, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Direction Nationale de l’Elevage du Mali. 1988. Rapport annuel 1988. Direction Nationale de l’Elevage du Mali, Bamako, Mali.Google Scholar
Djibrillou, O. A., Pandey, V. S., Gouro, S. A. and Verhulst, A. 1998. Effect of urea-treated or untreated straw with cotton seed on performances of lactating Maradi (Red Sokoto) goats in Niger. Livestock Production Science 55: 117–125.Google Scholar
Ehoche, P. W. and Buvanendran, V. 1983. Yield and composition of milk and pre-weaning growth rate in goats. World Review of Animal Production 19: 19–24.Google Scholar
Farina, L. 1987. La chèvre locale du Burundi: production laitière et croissance du chevreau pendant la période néonatale. Thesis M.Sc. no. 3, Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
French, M. H. 1970. Observations on goats. FAO Agricultural studies no. 80. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Gaines, W. L. 1927. Milk yield in relation to recurrence of conception. Journal of Dairy Science 10: 117.Google Scholar
Glatzle, A. 1991. Feed resources in the Sahel. Animal Research and Development 35: 43–58.Google Scholar
Guérin, H., Richard, D., Friot, D. and MBaye, Nd. 1986. Les choix alimentaires des bovins et des ovins sur pâturages sahéliens. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 26: 269–270.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. and Morand-Fehr, P. 1991. Intensive feeding of dairy goats. In Goat nutrition (ed. Morand-Fehr, P.), pp. 197–208. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hiernaux, P. H. Y., Cissé, M. I., Diarra, L. and de Leenw, P. N. 1994. Fluctuations saisonnières de la feuillaison des arbres et des buissons sahéliens. Conséquences pour la quantification des ressources fourragères. Revue d’Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 47: 117–125.Google Scholar
Institut d’Economie Rurale. 1992. Plan stratégique de la recherche aronomique au Mali. Programme Productions Animales, Vol. II, doc. 5; Février 1992. Institut d’Economie Rurale, Mali Google Scholar
Le Houérou, H. N. 1980. Composition chimique et valeur nutritive des fourrages ligneux en Afrique tropicale occidentale. In Les fourrages ligneux en Afrique: etat actuel des connaissances (ed. Le Houérou, H. N.) pp. 259–284. CIPEA, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, M. L. and Talapatra, S. K. 1975. Stall feeding of Jamnapari with cowpea fodders. Indian Veterinary Journal 52: 30–33.Google Scholar
Mba, A. U., Boyco, B. S. and Oyenuga, V. A. 1975. Studies on the milk composition of West African Dwarf, Red Sokoto and Saanen goats at different stages of lactation. I. Total solids, butterfat, solid-non-fat, protein, lactose and energy content of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 42: 217–226.Google Scholar
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. and Schneider, W. 1979. The estimation of digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro . Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 217–222.Google Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P., Bas, P., Blanchard, G., Daccord, R., Giger-Riverdin, S., Gihad, E. A., Hadjpanayiotou, M., Mowlem, A., Remeuf, F. and Sauvant, D. 1991. Influence of feeding on goat milk and technological characteristics. In Goat nutrition (ed. Morand-Fehr, P.), pp. 209–224. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Norton, B. W. 1994. The nutritive value of tree legumes. In Forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture (ed. Gutteridge, R. C. and Shelton, H. M.), pp. 177–191. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Penning de Vries, F. W. T. and Djitéye, M. A. 1982. La productivité des pâturages sahéliens, une étude des sols, des végétations et de l’exploitation de cette ressource naturelle. Agricultural research report no. 918. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Pfister, J. A. and Malechek, J. C. 1986. Dietary selection by goat and sheep in deciduous woodland of northern Brazil. Journal of Range Management 39: 24–28.Google Scholar
Piot, J., Nebout, J. P., Nanot, R. and Toutain, B. 1980. Utilisation des ligneux sahéliens par les herbivores domestiques. Etude quantitative dans la zone sud de la mare d’Oursi. GERDAT, Paris.Google Scholar
Ramìrez., R. G., Loyo, A., Mora, R. M., Sanchez, E. M. and Chaire, A. 1991. Forage intake and nutrition of range goats in shrubland of northeastern Mexico. Journal of Animal Science 69: 879–885.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., Soller, H. and Woodward, A. 1990. Fodder tree and straw diets for sheep: intake, growth, digestibility and the effects of phenolics on nitrogen utilisation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 30: 39–50.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D., Morand-Fehr, P. and Giger-Riverdin, S. 1991. Dry matter intake by adult goat. In Goat nutrition (ed. Morand-Fehr, P.), pp. 25–36. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T. 1983. Productions animales. In Recherches sur les systèmes de productions des zones arides du Mali (ed. R.T. Wilson, , de Leeuw, P.N. and de Haan, C.), pp. 63–94. CIPEA, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. T. and Light, D. 1986. Livestock production in Central Mali: economic characters and productivity indices for traditionally managed goat and sheep. Journal of Animal Production Research 62: 567–575.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. and Reed, J. D. 1989. The influence of polyphenolics on the nutritive value of browse: a summary of research conducted at ILCA. ILCA bulletin no. 35, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar