Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:02:09.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food intake, growth and body composition in Australian Merino sheep selected for high and low weaning weight. 2. Chemical and dissectible body composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Thompson ,
R. M. Butterfield  and
Diana Perry
J. M. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia
R. M. Butterfield
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia
Diana Perry
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Agriculture, Trangie, 2823, NSW, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The changes in chemical and dissectible body composition from birth to maturity were examined in rams and ewes from flocks of Merino sheep selected for high (weight-plus) and low (weight-minus) weaning weight and from a randomly bred control flock. Body composition was examined in 34 mature animals and the maturing patterns for body components calculated using mean values from the mature animals and individual data from 106 immature animals.

In the 34 mature animals, strain had no effect on the proportions of chemical and dissected fat, protein and muscle in the body. The weight-plus had greater proportions of ash and carcass bone in the body than the weight-minus animals. Mature rams had lower proportions of chemical and dissected fat and greater proportions of protein, muscle, ash and carcass bone in the body than mature ewes.

The weight-minus animals had later maturing patterns for both chemical and dissected fat than the weight-plus animals. Strain had no effect on the maturing patterns for protein and muscle, although both ash and carcass bone were later maturing in the weight-plus, than in the weight-minus animals. Chemical and dissected fat were later maturing in the ewes than in the rams, whereas protein, muscle, ash and carcass bone were earlier maturing in the ewes than in the rams.

The weight-minus animals were fatter at the heavier body weights, although there was a trend for the weight-plus animals to be slightly fatter at the lighter body weights. When compared at the same stage of maturity of body weight, strain differences in the proportion of fat in the body declined as the animals matured. Compositional differences between the rams and ewes varied according to the body weight or stage of maturity of body weight at which they were compared.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 71 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, B. B., Fredeen, H. T. and Weiss, G. M. 1974. Correlated response in birth weight, growth rate and carcass merit under single-trait selection for yearling weight in Beef Shorthorn cattle. Can., J. Anim. Sci. 54: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. L., Carter, A. H. and Cox, E. H. 1979. The effect of selection for body weight at different ages on fat deposition in mice. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 39: 118–128.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1974. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition. Proc. Ausl. Soc. Anim. Prod. 10: 211–218.Google Scholar
Broad, T. E. and Davies, A. S. 1980. Pre- and postnatal study of the carcass growth of sheep. 1. Growth of dissectible fat and its chemical components. Anim. Prod. 31: 61–71.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Griffiths, D. A., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and James, A. M. 1983. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 1. Muscle, bone and fat. Anim. Prod. 36: 29–37.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. and Thompson, J. M. 1983. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 4. Fat depots and bones. Anim. Prod. 37: 423–431.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A., JR and TAYLOR, ST C. S. 1971. Genetic analysis of degree of maturity. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 717–725.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D., Kirton, A. H. and Jury, K. E. 1970. Growth and development of sheep. II. Effect of breed and sex on the growth and carcass composition of the Southdown and Romney and their cross. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 13: 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. F. and McCarthy, J. C. 1976. The effects of selection at different ages for high and low body weight on the pattern of fat deposition in mice. Genet. Res. 27: 389–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayser, C. and Heusner, A. 1964. Comparative study of energy metabolism in various animals. J. Physiot., Paris 56: 489–524.Google Scholar
Koch, R. M. 1978. Selection in beef cattle. III. Correlated response of carcass traits to selection for weaning weight, yearling weight and muscling score in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and TAYLOR, ST C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs. Anim. Prod. 15: 301–306.Google Scholar
McPhee, C. P. and Neill, A. R. 1976. Changes in the body composition of mice selected for high and low eight week weight. Theor. appl. Genet. 47: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, D. M., Tulloh, N. M. and Winter, W. H. 1975. The effect of three different growth rates on the chemical composition of the dressed carcass of cattle and the relationships between chemical and dissected components. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 85: 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1982. A Theory of Feeding and Growth of Animals. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, W. A. 1965a. Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep. 1. Direct response to selection. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 5: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, W. A. 1965b. Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep. 2. Correlated responses in other production characters. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 5: 361–368.Google Scholar
Pattie, W. A. and Williams, A. J. 1966. Growth and efficiency of post-weaning gain in lambs from Merino flocks selected for high and low weaning weight. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 305–309.Google Scholar
Searle, T. W. and Hilmi, M. 1977. In vivo prediction with tritiated water of chemical and dissectible components of the dressed carcass of sheep growing at different rates. Aust. J. agric. Res. 28: 963–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1973. Genetic differences in milk production in relation to mature body weight Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. New Ser. 2: 15–26.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. M. 1982. Genetic manipulation of fatness in lamb carcases. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 14: 54–57.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. M., Parks, J. R. and PERRY DIANA. 1985. Food intake, growth and body composition in Australian Merino sheep selected for high and low weaning weight. 1. Food intake, food efficiency and growth. Anim. Prod. 40: 55–70.Google Scholar
Usher, C. D., Green, C. J. and Smith, C. A. 1973. The rapid determination of fat in various foods using the Foss-let density apparatus. J. Fd Technol. 8: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walstra, P. 1980. Growth and carcass composition from birth to maturity in relation to feeding level and sex in Dutch Landrace pigs. Meded. LandbHoogesch. Wageninen 80–4.Google Scholar