Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:34:55.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting birth weight of Santa Gertrudis calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. B. Willis  and
A. Wilson
M. B. Willis
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Get access

Summary

Birth weights of 568 Santa Gertrudis calves by 15 sires out of 111 different dams over a 14-year period were obtained from a herd in Cuba. Year of birth, season of birth, sex of calf, sire and dam all had highly significant influences upon birth weight but there was no effect of dam age or parity. Calf inbreeding ranged from 0 to 25% and led to a decrease of 012 kg in weight for each 1% increase in inbreeding. Calves surviving to weaning or dying between birth and weaning were of similar mean weight. Calves dying at birth were some 4·53 kg above the overall average of 38·59 kg. Sire effects covered a range of some 9·85 kg in birth weight. Heritability of birth weight estimated from an intra-class correlation between paternal half-sib groups was 0·67. Repeatability estimates were of the order of 0·22 from intra-class correlation and 0-24 on the basis of regression of later on earlier records. The overall least squares mean weight of 38-59 kg was several kg higher than previous estimates in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 231 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brinks, J. S., Clark, R. T. and Kieffer, N. M. 1963. Sex differences in response to inbreeding in a line of Hereford cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 816 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Brown, J. E., Cartwright, T. C. and Kruse, W. E. 1967. General and specific combining ability for birthweight in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 201 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cobb, E. H., Burns, W. C. and Koger, M. 1964. Comparative performance of British, Brahman and crossbred foundation cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 848 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cunningham, E. P. and Henderson, C. R. 1965. Repeatability of weaning traits in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, M., Mitchell, J. S., Kidder, R. W., Burns, W. C., Hentges, J. F. Jr and Warnick, A. C. 1967. Factors influencing survival in beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 205 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Muñoz, H. and Martin, T. G. 1968. [Growth before and after weaning in Criollo, Brahman and Santa Gertrudis cattle and their reciprocal crosses.] Mems Assoc. lat. am. Prod. anim. 3: 197 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Plasse, D. and Koger, M. 1967. [A study of birth and weaning weights in a registered Santa Gertrudis herd.] Mems Assoc. lat.-am. Prod. anim. 2: 7–22.Google Scholar
Plasse, D., Koger, M. and Verde, O. G. 1968. [Estimation of genetic parameters for prenatal and postnatal growth in the Santa Gertrudis.] Mems Assoc. lat.-am. Prod. anim. 3: 103–114.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. 1956. Heritability of multiple births in sheep. J.Anim. Sci. 15: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W. L., Koger, M., Kirk, W. G. and Peacock, F. M. 1959. Expression of hybrid vigor in birth weights of beef calves. J.Anim. Sci. 18: 1467 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Searle, S. R. 1971. Topics in variance component analysis. Biometrics 27: 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, J. D. and Joubert, D. M. 1963. A further note on the duration of pregnancy and birth weight in beef cattle in the sub-tropics. Proc. S. Afr. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2(2): 104–106.Google Scholar
Willis, M. 1968. A simple method for calculating Wright's coefficient of inbreeding. Rev. cubana Cienc. Agric. (Eng. ed.) 2: 171–174.Google Scholar
Willis, M. B. and Preston, T. R. 1968. The performance of different breeds of beef cattle in Cuba. Anim. Prod. 10: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, M. B. and Wilson, A. 1974. Comparative reproductive performance of Brahman and Santa Gertrudis cattle in a hot, humid environment. 1. Fertility and descriptive statistics. Anim. Prod. 18: 35–42.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. and Willis, M. B. 1974. Comparative reproductive performance of Brahman and Santa Gertrudis cattle in a hot humid environment. 2. Factors affecting calving interval. Anim. Prod. 18: 43–48.Google Scholar
Woodward, R. R. and Clark, R. T. 1959. A study of stillbirths in a herd of range cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar