Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:54:44.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects on growth, food intake and rumen volume of including untreated or ammonia-treated barley straw in a complete diet for weaning calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. E. V. Williams ,
G. M. Innes ,
A. Brewer  and
J. P. Magadi
P. E. V. Williams
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
G. M. Innes
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
A. Brewer
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. P. Magadi
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted using British Friesian bull calves to determine the effects on growth, food intake and rumen volume of including 0, 150, 200 or 250 g ammonia-treated (35 g/kg dry matter (DM)) or untreated barley straw per kg pelleted concentrate based on cereal. All calves received once daily 440 g milk replacer powder reconstituted in 3 1 warm water, were weaned at 56 days of age and given one of the seven pelleted diets to appetite from 14 days of age. In experiment 1, the seven diets were allocated at random to 70 calves. Food intake was increased by the inclusion of straw but there was no effect on intake of the increased concentration of straw; daily DM intake from 14 to 77 days of age was 1·36 and 1·77 kg/day respectively for diets with or without straw. From 14 to 56 days of age intake of concentrate was increased by the addition of straw but was negatively correlated with the concentration of straw in the diet. After weaning inclusion of straw, whilst increasing total intake, tended to depress intake of cereal. Treatment with ammonia increased the nitrogen concentration in the straw but had no effect on the digestibility or amount of diet consumed. After adjustment was made for gut fill, the increases in weight between 4 and 84 days of age of calves given 150, 200 or 250 g straw per kg food were 6·6, 1·2 and 1·0 kg respectively greater than those that occurred when there was no straw in the diet. DM digestibility of all diets was above 0·67 but the mean digestibility of acid detergent fibre was low (0·19). The pH and ammonia concentration of rumen liquor were low and below the optimum for cellulose digestion. In experiment 2, rumen volume was measured in vivo in a group of 24 calves given the same diets as in experiment 1. Rumen volume was increased two fold at 42 days of age by the addition of straw to the diet (5·6 v. 2·6 1, P < 0·001), by 87 days of age the difference was increased to 7·11, (19·0 v. 11·9 1, P < 0·01). When all calves were given the same diet from 91 days of age, there was no effect of previous treatment on intake or rumen volume at 147 days of age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 63 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Hutcheson, M. K., Robertson, J. M. and Wilson, A. L. 1952. The influence of diet on the development of the alimentary tract of the calf. Br. J. Nutr. 6: i–ii (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A. W. 1970. The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculations by computer. Analyst, Lond. 95: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, J. T. 1969. Development of the digestive and metabolic apparatus of the calf. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 1303–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyden, S. 1961. Determination of the amount of fluid in the reticulorumen of the sheep and its rate of passage to the omasum. K. LantbrHögsk. Annlr 27: 51.Google Scholar
Kang, H. S. and Leibholz, Jane. 1973. The roughage requirement of the early-weaned calf. Anim. Prod. 16: 195–203.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Grant, T. and Chudleigh, J. W. 1973. The effect of roughage and buffers in the diet of early weaned calves. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 13: 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Osbourn, D. F. 1977. Effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 on food intake, growth rate and acid-base balance in calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z., Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1977. Rates of fermentation in relation to ammonia concentration. Br. J. Nutr. 38: 437–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mould, F. L., Ørskov, E. R. and Gauld, S. A. 1983/1984. Associative effects of mixed feeds. II. The effect of dietary addition of bicarbonate salts on the voluntary intake and digestibility of diets containing various proportions of hay and barley. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 10: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottenstein, D. M. and Bartley, D. A. 1971. Separation of free acids C2-C5 in dilute aqueous solution, column technology. J. chromat. Sci. 9: 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1964. The nutrition of intensively-reared calves. Vet. Rec. 76: 511–526.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D. and Roffler, R. E. 1977. Calculating requirements for protein and non-protein nitrogen by ruminants. Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, pp. 133–136. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. S. 1977. Factors affecting the cellulolytic activity of rumen contents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33: 497–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stobo, I. J. F., Roy, J. H. B. and Gaston, Helen J. 1966a. Rumen development in the calf. 1. The effect of diets containing different proportions of concentrates to hay on rumen development. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stobo, I. J. F., Roy, J. H. B. and Gaston, Helen J. 1966b. Rumen development in the calf. 1. The effect of diets containing different proportions of concentrates to hay on digestive efficiency. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SundstØl, F., Coxworth, E. and Mowat, D. N. 1978. Improving the nutritive value of straw and other low quality roughages by treatment with ammonia. Wld Anim. Rev. 26: 13–21.Google Scholar
Thomas, Delana B. and Hinks, C. E. 1982. The effect of changing the physical form of roughage on the performance of the early-weaned calf. Anim. Prod. 35: 375–384.Google Scholar
Thomas, Delana B. and Hinks, C. E. 1983. A note on the optimum level of roughage inclusion in the diet of the early-weaned calf. Anim. Prod. 36: 299–301.Google Scholar
Van soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H. 1968. Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fibre with permanganate. Jnl. Ass. off. analyt. Chem. 51: 780–785.Google Scholar
Warner, R. G., Flatt, W. P. and Loosli, J. K. 1956. Dietary factors influencing the development of the ruminant stomach. J. agric. Fd Chem. 4: 788–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R., Cooke, G. H. and Chapman, B. T. 1967. Problems associated with the continuous monitoring of ammoniacal nitrogen in river water. Autom. Analyt. Chem. 2: 377–380.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V. 1977. An examination of the effects of climatic housing and nutrition on the performance of calves. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V. 1983/1984. Digestibility studies on ammonia-treated straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 10: 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. E. V., Day, N., Raven, A. M. and McLean, J. A. 1981. The effect of climatic housing and level of nutrition on the performance of calves. Anim. Prod. 32: 133–141.Google Scholar