Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:38:50.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the physical form of the diet on the consumption of solid food by calves, and the distribution of food residues in their alimentary tracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Hodgson
J. Hodgson
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural Sciences, The University, Leeds 2
Get access

Summary

1. British Friesian male calves were offered, in two experiments, either chopped, or ground and pelleted dried grass diets to appetite. In one experiment the pelleted diet was also given in restricted quantities. The calves were slaughtered without being fasted, 6 to 9 weeks after weaning, and detailed measurements were made of the weights and volumes of the sections of the alimentary tract and its contents, and of other abdominal organs.

2. Grinding and pelleting the diet reduced mean retention time by approximately 50% and digestibility by 6 to 8 units, and increased dry-matter intake in the two experiments by 55 or 32% respectively, and growth rate by 53 and 69% respectively.

3. The ground and pelleted diets resulted in a smaller quantity of fluid digesta in the rumen, and a much greater quantity in the abomasum and small intestine.

4. There were smaller differences between diets in the quantity of digesta in the combined caecum and colon, or in the total volume of the organs of the abdomen, than in the amount of digesta in the rumen. It is suggested that further critical studies are required upon the importance of the contents of the alimentary tract, or of the abdomen as a whole, in the control of voluntary food intake in ruminants.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , October 1973 , pp. 129 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1962. Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32: 669–686.Google Scholar
Benzie, D. and Phiixipson, A. T. 1957. The Alimentary Tract of the Ruminant. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. and Wainman, F. W. 1956. Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep and on related problems. Br. J. Nutr. 10: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C. and Freer, M. 1966. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 8. Experiments with ground, pelleted roughages. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 229–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. and Balch, C. C. 1963. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 6. A preliminary experiment with ground, pelleted hay. Br. J. Nutr. 17: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, Elizabeth J. 1956. The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. 1. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. Br. J. Nutr. 10: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, R. W., Mullenax, C. H. and Allison, M. J. 1965. Physiological phenomena associated with eructation in ruminants. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R. W.), pp. 159–170. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1971. Physiological changes affecting voluntary food intake in ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 135–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodall, E. D. and Kay, R. N. B. 1965. Digestion and absorption in the large intestine of the sheep. J. Physiol., Lond. 176: 12–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Wainman, F. W. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening cattle and sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. pp. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1968. A study of some factors influencing the intake of solid food by young calves. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Leeds.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971a. The development of solid food intake in calves. 1. The effect of previous experience of solid food and the physical form of the diet on the development of food intake after weaning. Anim. Prod. 13: 15–24.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971b. The development of solid food intake in calves. 2. Studies on the volume of rumen fluid, determined by an indirect method. Anim. Prod. 13: 25–36.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971c. The development of solid food intake in calves. 3. The relation between solid food intake and the development of the alimentary tract. Anim. Prod. 13: 449–460.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971d. The development of solid food intake in calves. 4. The effect of the addition of material to the rumen, or its removal from the rumen, on voluntary food intake. Anim. Prod. 13: 581–592.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Cottrell, K. M. 1973. A note on the relationships between solid food intake, the volume of the abdominal organs and external body measurements in calves. Anim. Prod. 17: 197–200.Google Scholar
Mákelá, A. 1956. Studies on the question of bulk in the nutrition of farm animals with special reference to cattle. Suom. maatal. Seur. Julk., No. 85.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. and Ash, R. W. 1965. Physiological mechanisms affecting the flow of digesta in ruminants. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R. W.), pp. 97–107. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Rodrigue, C. B. and Allen, N. H. 1960. The effect of fine grinding on ration digestibility, rate of passage and fat content of milk. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. and Coombe, J. B. 1961. The development of rumen function in the lamb. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12: 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar