No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The effect of systems of grassland management and winter feeding on the productivity of an 18-month grass-cereal beef system
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Abstract
Experiments in two successive years with 24 cattle compared a six-paddock grazing system with a simpler two-field system. In each system the whole area was cut for conservation once during the season. The two systems were stocked each at 3·9 or 6·5 cattle/ha. In the following winters the cattle were offered grass silage (1974) or dried lucerne pellets (1975) ad libitum with two levels of barley.
Daily gains on pasture were depressed by the higher stocking rate but there was no difference between grazing systems. The yield of conserved grass was least on the high stocking rate two-field system. The estimated output of utilized metabolizable energy per hectare was highest on the high stocking rate paddock grazing system but the output from the low stocking rate two-field system was almost as high. It was concluded that the latter system was valuable in many practical situations. Cattle that had been grazed at low stocking rates finished earlier in winter. There was some evidence of winter compensation in cattle weight gain on diets with dried lucerne pellets but not on grass silage diets.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978
References
REFERENCES
Alderman, G., Griffiths, J. R., Morgan, D. E., Edwards, R. A., Raven, A. M., Holmes, W. and Lessells, W. J. 1974. An approach to the practical application of a metabolisable energy system for ruminants in the UK. In Proc. 7th Nutr. Conf. Feed Manufacturers (ed. Lewis, D. and Swan, H.), pp. 37–78. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. K. 1975. Grassland systems for beef production from dairy bred and beef calves. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2: 121–136.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Kilkenny, J. B., Spedding, A. W. and Tayler, J. C. 1971. Beef production. An intensive grassland system using autumn-born calves. Handbook No. 1, Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Escuder, J. G. 1970. Some aspects of the nutrition of beef cattle. (The utilization of low quality roughage in winter and high quality pastures in summer.) Ph.D. Thesis, Wye College, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. 1974. A simple two-area system of grassland management for semi-intensive beef production from autumn born calves. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 3: 92 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Holmes, W. 1974. The role of nitrogen fertiliser in the production of beef from grass. In The Role of Nitrogen in Grassland Productivity. Proc. No. 142, pp. 57–59. The Fertiliser Society, London.Google Scholar
Hood, A. E. M. and Bailie, J. H. 1973. A new grazing system for beef cattle—the two field system. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 28: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. and Holmes, W. 1974. The effect of nitrogen, stocking rate and grazing method on the output of pasture grazed by beef cattle. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 29: 93–99.Google Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. and Holmes, W. 1978. Compensatory growth by beef cattle at grassland or on an alfalfa-based diet. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, J. B. 1976. The grazing feed intake of Hereford and Brahman cross cattle in a cool temperate environment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 131–134.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. and Gomez, P. O. 1976. The production of chromic oxide paper pellets for use with young grazing cattle. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 32: 49–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, J. B. and Holmes, W. 1974. Compensatory growth; responses during realimentation following differential levels of grazing nutrition. Meat and Livestock Commission Bletchley, Buckinghamshire, Mimeo Rep.Google Scholar