Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:06:58.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sward height and active immunization against androstenedione on reproductive performance of ewes of two Welsh breeds in different body conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Gunn ,
S. M. Rhind ,
T. J. Maxwell ,
D. A. Sim ,
J. R. Jones  and
M. E. James
R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
S. M. Rhind
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
T. J. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
J. R. Jones
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Bronydd Mawr, Trecastle, Brecon, Powys LD3 8RD
M. E. James
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Bronydd Mawr, Trecastle, Brecon, Powys LD3 8RD
Get access

Abstract

In a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment, the effects on reproductive performance of active immunization against androstenedione and of two sward heights in two periods, August to October (period 1) and October to November (period 2), were investigated in 144 Beulah Speckled-face and 146 Brecknock Cheviot ewes. Sward heights of either 5 to 6 cm (2200 kg dry matter (DM) per ha) (high) or 2 to 3 cm (650 kg DM per ha) (low) were achieved by adjustment of stocking rate during period 1. Two groups of ewes were balanced for body condition score across breed and sward height and the ewes of one group were actively immunized against androstenedione by injection with Fecundin® at 8 and 5 weeks before mating at the second synchronized oestrus after progestagen pessary withdrawal. Ewes were reallocated to the high (at 15 ewes per ha) and low (at 20 ewes per ha) swards at the start of period 2 by breed and immunization treatment, balanced for live weight, body condition score and sward height in period 1. After mating in mid November, all ewes were run at 19 ewes per ha on the residual pasture of the high sward until slaughtered either at return to service or at 4 weeks after first mating when corpora lutea and embryos were counted.

There were no effects or interactions due to sward height in period 1 on the reproductive responses to sward height in period 2. Ovulation and potential lambing rates were greater in the Beulah breed than in the Cheviot, and on the high sward than on the low in period 2. Ovulation rates were higher in immunized ewes than in control ewes but the effects of immunization and sward height on potential lambing rate were not independent. Potential lambing rates were higher in immunized ewes than in control ewes at the low sward height but not at the high sward height.

Adjustment of stocking rate during period 1 served to increase the range in ewe body condition at the start of period 2 in mid October. Reproductive response to body condition at this time differed between the breeds, the relationship being strongly positive in the more prolific Beulah control ewes but less so in the less prolific Cheviot control ewes. The response to immunization in both breeds was relatively greater at lower levels of body condition, thereby reducing the effect of body condition in immunized ewes.

The use of Fecundin® is therefore unlikely to produce much advantage when pre-mating nutrition or body condition are high but there may be some advantage in using it when nutritional resources are limited in the autumn, particularly in ewes in poorer body condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , June 1988 , pp. 417 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boland, M. P., Nancarrow, C. D., Murray, J. D., Scaramuzzi, R. J., Sutton, R., Hoskinson, R. M. and Hazelton, I. G. 1986. Fertilization and early embryonic development in androstenedione-immunized Merino ewes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 78: 423–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, R. I., Wilson, P. A., Scaramuzzi, R. J., Hoskinson, R. M., George, J. M. and Bindon, B. M. 1982. The active immunization of sheep against oestrone, androstenedione or testosterone to increase twinning. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14: 511–514.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. 1969. Prenatal mortality in the sheep: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 37: 173–190.Google Scholar
Geldard, H. 1985. Immunization: reproductive response to Fecundin in sheep. Animal Production 40: 552–553 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Geldard, H. and Scaramuzzi, R. J. 1983. Immunizing ewes to increase lambing percentage — further developments. Proceedings of Western Australian Wheat Sheep Review, Farm Management Foundation of Australia, pp. 39–51.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Smith, W. F., Senior, A. J., Barthram, E. and Sim, D. A. 1983. Pre-mating pasture intake and reproductive responses in North Country Cheviot ewes in different body conditions. Animal Production 36: 509 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Sibbald, A. M., Lamb, C. S., McCormack, H. A., Mayes, R. W. and Lees, J. A. 1986. The herbage intake of ewes grazing perennial ryegrass swards and when given supplements during lactation and in the autumn. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.), British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium No. 19, pp. 124–128.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M. 1987. A note on the reproductive performance of ewes of different genotypes following active immunization against androstenedione. Animal Production 44: 326–329.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Gunn, R. G., Morris, B. A., Clayton, J., Leslie, I. D. and Gittus, G. 1985. Effect of passive immunization against testosterone on the reproductive performance of Scottish Blackface ewes in different levels of body condition at mating. Animal Production 41: 97–102.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Morris, B. A., Clayton, J., Doney, J. M., Gunn, R. G. and Leslie, I. D. 1986. Effect of active or passive immunization against steroids on reproductive performance of ewes in different levels of body condition at mating. Animal Production 43: 285–292.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Morris, B. A., Clayton, J. and Gittus, G. 1987. Effect of level of food intake at mating on the reproductive performance of ewes passively immunized against testosterone. Animal Production 45: 81–85.Google Scholar
Smith, J. F. 1983. Towards multiple ovulations — steroid immunisation techniques and results. Proceedings of the 13th Seminar of the Sheep and Beef Cattle Society of the New Zealand Veterinary Association, Waikato University, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. 1973. Breeding for increased productivity. Veterinary Record 92: 609–613.Google Scholar