Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:48:57.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of method of breeding on reproductive performance in indigenous goats (Capra prisca) mated at the beginning of the breeding season

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Zygoyiannis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaloniki, Greece
N. Katsaounis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaloniki, Greece
G. Karatzas
Affiliation:
Centre of Artificial Insemination and Pathology of Reproduction, Diavata, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Ninety-nine indigenous Greek goats (Capra prisca) on natural pasture were used to study reproductive performance as affected by method of breeding. At the beginning of the breeding season oestrus was induced with 45 mg fluorogestone acetate-impregnated vaginal sponges and 300 to 500 i.u. PMSG, given on day 15. The animals were separated into groups of 33 for mating: (i) by natural service (natural mating); (2) by artificial insemination with fresh semen (AI fresh); and (3) by insemination with frozen semen (AI frozen). Alpine bucks and Alpine semen were used for natural mating and AI of does.

No effect of method of breeding was found on gestation length and sex ratio. Reproductive performance was significantly affected by method of breeding; at 21 days after insemination, fertility of does bred with fresh semen (69·7%) was comparable with that obtained with natural mating (72·7%) but the fertility of does bred with frozen semen (48·5%) was much lower. This difference was statistically significant at kidding (P < 0·05). Litter size was 2·14 and 1·86 (P < 0·05) for the AI fresh and AI frozen groups, respectively, and was 1·96 for the natural mating group. More multiple litters were obtained with the AI fresh group (P < 0·05). It is concluded that, induction and synchronization of oestrus and ovulation at the beginning of the breeding season gave reproductive performance with fresh semen comparable to that obtained with natural service, but use of frozen semen gave unsatisfactory results.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Colas, G., Dauzier, L., Courot, M., Ortavant, R. and Signoret, J. P. 1968. Resultats obtenus au cours de l'etude de quelques facteurs importants de Pinsèmination artificielle ovine. Annales de Zootechnie 17: 4757.Google Scholar
Corteel, J. M., Baril, G. and Leboeuf, B. 1980. Seasonal variations in the fertilizing capacity of washed deep frozen goat sperm. 9th International Congress on Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Madrid, Vol III, p. 396. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.Google Scholar
Donchev, P. and Donchev, D. 1978. Oestrous synchronization in goats. Zhivotnovodstvo 32: 5253.Google Scholar
East of Scotland College of Agriculture. 1979. Winter feeding of ewes. Advisory Leaflet 111. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fougner, J. A. 1974. Intra-uterine method of inseminating goats with frozen semen. Norsk Veterinaertidsskrift 86: 551553.Google Scholar
Gall, C. 1981. Husbandry. In Goat Production (ed. Gall, C.), pp. 411432. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1979. Fertility in Cheviot ewes. 1. The effect of body condition at mating on ovulation rate and early embryo mortality in North and South Country Cheviot ewes. Animal Production 29: 1116.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Smith, W. F. 1979. Fertility in Cheviot ewes. 2. The effect of level of pre-mating nutrition on ovulation rate and early embryo mortality in North and South Country Cheviot ewes in moderately-good condition at mating. Animal Production 29: 1723.Google Scholar
Hackett, A. J., Inskeep, E. K., Robertson, H. A., Shrestha, J. N. B. and Wolynetz, M. S. 1979. Comparison of artificial insemination and natural mating on reproductive performance of five strains of sheep during the anoestrus season in an intensive system. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 675683.Google Scholar
Karatzas, G. and Smetis, N. 1984. Oestrus synchronization and natural mating in local goats during anoestrus period. Bulletin of Physiopathology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination 1-2, pp. 1823.Google Scholar
Katsaounis, N. and Zygoyiannis, D. 1986. The East Friesland sheep in Greece. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 1930.Google Scholar
Kupferschmied, H. and Muther, E. 1977. Experiences with artificial insemination and oestrous synchronisation in goats. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 119: 405413.Google Scholar
Langford, G. A., Marcus, G. J., Hackett, A. J., Ainsworth, L., Wolynetz, M. S. and Peters, H. F. 1979. A comparison of fresh and frozen semen in the insemination of confined sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 685691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, R. J. and Salamon, S. 1970a. Fertility of ram spermatozoa frozen by the pellet method. I. Transport and viability of spermatozoa within the genital tract of the ewe. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 22: 385398.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, R. J. and Salamon, S. 1970b. Fertility of ram spermatozoa frozen by the pellet method. II. The effects of method of insemination on fertilization and embryonic mortality. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 22: 399408.Google Scholar
Mattner, P. E., Entwistle, K. W. and Martin, I. C. A. 1969. Passage, survival and fertility of deep-frozen ram semen in the genital tract of the ewe. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 22: 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture. 1988. Agricultural Programme, p. 115. Ministry of Agriculture, Athens.Google Scholar
Neil, J. D., Johansson, E. D. B., Datta, J. K. and Knobil, E. 1967. Relationship between the plasma levels of luteinizing hormone and progesterone during the normal menstrual cycle. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 27: 11671173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricordeau, G. 1981. Genetics: breeding plans. In Goat Production (ed. Gall, C.), pp. 111169. Academic Press. London.Google Scholar
Robertson, H. A. and Sarda, I. R. 1971. A very early pregnancy test for mammals: its application to the cow, ewe and sow. Journal of Endocrinology 49: 407419.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 451454.Google Scholar
Speedy, A. W. 1980. Sheep Production: Science into Practice, p. 51. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
Zygoyiannis, D. 1987. The milk yield and milk composition of the Greek indigenous goat (Capra prised) as influenced by duration of suckling period. Animal Production 44: 107116.Google Scholar
Zygoyiannis, D. 1988. Performance of indigenous goats (Capra prisca) in Greece as affected by season of kidding. World Review of Animal Production 24: 3136.Google Scholar
Zygoyiannis, D. and Katsaounis, N. 1986. Milk yield and milk composition of indigenous goats (Capra prisca) in Greece. Animal Production 42: 365374.Google Scholar