Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:30:28.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of different pasture management strategies during the weaning-to-mating period on reproductive performance of Greyface ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF.
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF.
R. D. M. Agnew
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF.
W. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF.
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF.
Get access

Abstract

The effects on reproductive performance of different strategies of pasture management designed to conserve herbage in situ during the late growing season for use during the pre-mating and mating period were studied in three experiments over 3 years with Greyface ewes. Two experiments with 341 ewes compared set-stocking of pasture at 12 ewes per ha on two initial levels of herbage mass with a conservation strategy which left half of the area ungrazed and grazed the other half of the area at 24 ewes per ha from late August until mid October (2 weeks before the start of mating) after which the total area was grazed at 12 ewes per ha. In a third experiment with 124 ewes, the conservation strategy left a quarter of the area ungrazed and varied stocking rate to a minimum of 12 ewes per ha to maintain two initial levels of herbage mass on the other three-quarters of the area and then compared set-stocking at six ewes per ha on this area with set-stocking at 18 ewes per ha on the previously ungrazed quarter of the area during the pre-mating and mating period.

Initial levels of herbage mass were within the range of 2000 to 2100 kg dry matter (DM) per ha (7 cm sward height; high) and 1500 to 1700 kg DM per ha (4 to 5 cm; low). Mean herbage accumulation rates between August and October were estimated to be 25 and 44 kg DM per ha per day in the first two experiments. Initial live weight and body condition score also varied considerably between years and subsequent response was influenced by herbage growth rate. Where mean ewe body condition was within the score 2·75 to 3·00, range over the mating period and herbage mass on set-stocked areas was not higher than 2200 kg DM per ha (8 cm sward height) in the pre-mating period or not lower than 1300 kg DM per ha (3·5 cm) at about 3 weeks after mating, the strategy of management did not influence reproductive performance in terms of the number of lambs born. Within these limits, however, reproductive performance was positively related to herbage mass in late August (low = 1·60, high = 1·94).

When herbage mass fell below the 1300 kg DM per ha level before or during mating, reproductive performance was improved by a herbage-conservation strategy which maintained ewe body-condition score within the 2·75 to 3·00 range. When herbage mass and growth rate were high, reproductive performance was also improved by a herbage-conservation strategy which restricted the development of excessive body condition before mating by avoiding the increase in barrenness shown to derive from very high levels of body condition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gunn, R. G. and Maxwell, T. J. 1989. A note on the effect of the direction of live-weight change about the time of mating on reproductive performance of Greyface ewes. Animal Production 48: 471474.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Maxwell, T. J. 1983. Grazing research and grazing management. Hill Farming Research Organisation, Biennial Report 1979–81, pp. 169187.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Leslie, I. D. 1984. A note on the reproductive performance of Greyface ewes in moderately fat and very fat condition at mating. Animal Production 38: 305307.Google Scholar