Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:56:06.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of diets containing different levels of wheat straw on lamb performance, feed intake and digestibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. B. O'Donovan  and
M. B. Ghadaki
P. B. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
M. B. Ghadaki
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
Get access

Summary

A total of 120, 6–7-month-old fat-tailed uncastrated Kellakui lambs were randomly allotted to three groups, given fattening diets for 93 days and then slaughtered. The diets contained 10 (A), 20 (B) or 30% (C) coarsely chopped wheat straw; the latter was increased at the expense of dried beet pulp. All diets contained 45% ground barley, 10% beet molasses and 1% ground oyster shells; there were minor adjustments in the cottonseed meal percentage to maintain a similar protein level in all diets.

The three diets were also given in sequence to six adult male Kizil (fat-tailed) sheep in a digestibility trial. Further digestion trials were made with chopped wheat straw given alone or supplemented with 400, 800 and 1200 g of a concentrate consisting of 75% dried beet pulp and 25% cottonseed meal; an all-concentrate treatment was also included.

Daily gain (g), feed efficiency (kg feed/kg gain) and dressing percentages for lambs given diets A, B and C were, respectively: 154, 9·78, 54·5; 159, 9·85, 53·5; 127, 11·30, 53·1. A significant decrease in daily gain occurred with the highest straw level and considerably more feed was required per unit of gain. Supplementing straw with 400 g of concentrate increased daily dry-matter intake per sheep from 645 g to 1214 g, with further but smaller increases at higher levels of supplementation. Almost linear increases were observed in dry-matter digestibility as more concentrate was given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 77 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. and Wilson, R. S. 1963. The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Anim. Prod. 5: 27–42.Google Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. 1966. The nutritive value of ground and pelleted barley straw. 1. Ground and pelleted v long straw for growing Ayrshire heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Murdoch, J. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughages by cows. J. Dairy Res. 33: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, J. R. and Williams, G. L. 1971a. The voluntary intake and utilization of roughage-concentrate diets by sheep. 1. Concentrate supplements for hay and straw. Anim. Prod. 13: 71–82.Google Scholar
Crabtree, J. R. and Williams, G. L. 1971b. The voluntary intake and utilization of roughage-concentrate diets by sheep. 2. Barley and soya bean meal supplementation of hay diets. Anim. Prod. 13: 83–92.Google Scholar
Ghadaki, M. B., O'Donovan, P. B. and Behesti, R. D. 1972. Comparison of three straw-based rations for ewes during pregnancy and the pre-lambing response to selected levels of concentrate feeding. Tech. Rep. Anim. Husb. Res. Inst., Heydarabad, No. 18.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W., Drake-Brockman, R. M. and White, N. 1965. The feed intake of milk cows. 1. Intake of winter rations during pregnancy and lactation and the influence of change to pasture. Anim. Prod. 7: 27–37.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. and MacLusky, D. S. 1955. The effect of pasture management methods and supplementary feed on the production and the feed consumption of dairy cows. In Animal Production from Grass. Publ. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod. No. 6, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
Horwitz, W. (ed.) 1970. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Swan, H. and Clarke, R. T. 1966. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 1. Substitution of maize by milled barley straw in a beef fattening diet and its effects on performance and carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 8: 303–311.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, P. B. 1971. Feed resources for livestock in Iran. Relationship of feed production to livestock requirements. Tech. Rep. Anim. Husb. Res. Inst., Heydarabad, No. 8.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Miller, E. L. and Bridge, P. S. 1968. A study of the voluntary intake of food and water and the lactation performance of cows given diets of varying roughage content ad libitum. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70: 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B., Miller, E. L. and Bridge, P. S. 1969. Complete diets given ad libitum to dairy cows—the effect of the level of inclusion of milled straw. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72: 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T. 1956. Some nutritional effects of varying concentrate-roughage ratios in relation to feed input-milk output by dairy cows. Mem. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 344.Google Scholar