Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:47:49.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of avoparcin and monensin on the performance of growing and finishing cattle offered grass silage-based diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. F. Unsworth ,
I. I. McCullough ,
T. A. McCullough ,
D. G. O'Neill ,
R. W. J. Steen  and
C. I. Titterington
E. F. Unsworth
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agricultural and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
I. I. McCullough
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agricultural and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
T. A. McCullough
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agricultural and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
D. G. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agricultural and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agricultural and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
C. I. Titterington
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agricultural and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Get access

Abstract

The effect on animal performance of the inclusion in the diet of avoparcin at one or more of the following levels 0, 150, 300 and 450 mg per head daily and 200 mg per head daily monensin was studied i n a series of four trials. Finishing cattle of 428 (s.e. 3·9) kg live weight were used in three trials and yearling heifers (218 (s.e. 4·9) kg live weight) in the fourth. All animals received grass silage ad libitum with 0·5 to 6·0 kg per head daily of a cereal-based supplement. Relative to the control diets with no additive, proportionate increases in live-weight gain of between 0·07 and 0·38 were obtained with the inclusion of avoparcin at 150 mg per head daily in the diet with a small depression in silage dry-matter intake. The effects at higher levels of inclusion of avoparcin and of monensin were more variable. Alteration in the proportion of propionate to acetate in the rumen fluid of the animals was observed only at the highest levels of additive inclusion. There was no effect of additive treatment on carcass weight or dressing proportion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. D. and Harrison, D. G. 1979. The effect of the dietary addition of monensin upon digestion in the stomachs of sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38: 32A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
Boling, J. A., Bradley, N. W. and Campbell, L. D. 1977. Monensin levels for growing and finishing steers. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 867–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthbert, N. H., Thickett, W. S. and Smith, H. 1984. The efficacy of dietary avoparcin for improving the performance of growing-finishing beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 39: 195–200.Google Scholar
Dyer, I. A., Koes, R. M., Herluoson, M. L., Ojikutu, L. B., Preston, R. L., Zimmer, P. and Delay, R. 1980. Effect of avoparcin and monensin on performance of finishing heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 843–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, R. J., Herlugson, M. L., Ojikutu, L. B., Cordova, G., Dyer, I. A., Zimmer, P. and Delay, R. 1979. Effect of avoparcin and monensin on feedlot performance of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 1338–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M., Pejic, N. and Hunter, E. A. 1983. The value of food additives in beef production systems. Anim. Prod. 36: 528 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
MacGregor, R. C. and Armstrong, D. G. 1982. Mode of action of the food antibiotic avoparcin in sheep. Anim. Prod. 34: 376. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
MacGregor, R. C. and Armstrong, D. G. 1984. The feed antibiotic avoparcin and net uptake of amino acids from the small intestine of sheep. Can. J. Anim. Set. 64: Suppl., pp. 134–135.Google Scholar
Mowat, D. N., Wiiton, J. W. and Buchanan-smith, J. G. 1977. Monensin fed to growing and finishing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 57: 769–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. A., Burgess, T. D. and Mowat, D. N. 1983. Effects of feeding avoparcin in combination with progesterone-estradiol implants on growing and finishing steers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 885–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Beirne, P. and John, J. A. 1983. Effect of avoparcin on live-weight gain of growing-finishing cattle. Anim. Prod. 36: 527 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Raun, A. P., Cooley, C. O., Potter, E. L., Rathmacher, R. P. and Richardson, L. F. 1976. Effect of monensin on feed efficiency of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 670–677.Google Scholar
Raun, N. S. and Burroughs, W. 1962. Suction strainer technique in obtaining rumen fluid samples from intact lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 454–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, L. F., Raun, A. P., Potter, E. L., Cooley, C. O. and Rathmacher, R. P. 1976. Effect of monensin on rumen fermentation in vitro and in vivo. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 657–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, J. R., Jones, D. W. and Smith, H. 1983. The response of growing cattle to avoparcin. Anim. Prod. 36: 515 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Unsworth, E. F. 1981. The composition and quality of grass silages made in Northern Ireland — an analysis of seven years' results (1973-1979). Rec. Agric. Res. (N. Ir.) 29: 91–97.Google Scholar
Utley, P. R. 1976. Use of rumensin in growing and finishing beef cattle — a review. Proc. Georgia Nutr. Conf. Feed Industry, pp. 123–126.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46: 829–835.Google Scholar