Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:25:34.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The digestion of dry matter and non-starch polysaccharides from diets containing plain sugar-beet pulp or wheat straw by pregnant sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. Yan
Affiliation:
Pig Department, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
A. C. Longland
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberyswyth SY23 3EB
W. H. Close
Affiliation:
Pig Department, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
C. E. Sharpe
Affiliation:
Pig Department, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
H. D. Keal
Affiliation:
Pig Department, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
Get access

Abstract

Forty days after mating, 16 pregnant sows were randomly allocated to two diets containing either sugar-beet pulp (SBP) or wheat straw (WS) each offered at two levels (1·0 or 1·5 × maintenance energy requirement (M), where M = 460 kJ digestible energy (DE) per kg0·75 per day). Diets were iso-nitrogenous, and contained similar levels of DE together with 260 g non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) per kg dry matter (DM) largely derived from either the SBP or the WS. A 7-day NSP and DM balance was made between day 60 and 100 of gestation. During lactation sows had ad libitum access to a conventional sow diet which contained neither SBP or WS.

Outputs of both fresh and dry faeces from sows given diet WS were significantly greater than the outputs from sows given the corresponding SBP diets (P <0·05), and outputs were significantly greater at the higher feeding level for both diets (P < 0·05). There was a tendency for higher urinary outputs from sows given diet WS, but these were variable and not significantly different from those from sows given diet SBP. The apparent digestibility and retention of DM was significantly greater for the SBP diet than for diet WS but were not significantly affected by feeding level. The apparent digestibilities of the total NSP and each of the individual constituent monomers were significantly higher for diet SBP than for diet WS (P < 0·001), but were independent of feeding level (P> 0·05). Xylose was the most poorly digested NSP constituent from both diets. Apparent digestibility coefficients for the remaining NSP constituents in diet SBP were > 0·8 and were > 0·52 in diet WS, with the uronic acids and mannose being the most highly digested NSP fractions from diets SBP and WS respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, G. L. 1977. Using dehydrated alfalfa to control intake of self-fed sows during gestation. Feedstuffs 49: 2027.Google Scholar
Chabeauti, E., Noblet, J. and Carre, B. 1991. Digestion of plant cell walls from four different sources in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 32: 207213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, H. M., Friend, D. W. and Nicholson, J. W. G. 1962. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Canadian journal of Animal Science 42: 167175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englyst, H. N. and Cummings, J. H. 1984. Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst, London 9: 937942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, D. 1975. Effects of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls. Animal Production 21: 5968.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1987. Genstat Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Graham, H., Hesselman, K. and Aman, P. 1986. The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cereal-based pig diet. Journal of Nutrition 116: 242251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepler, M., Libal, G. W. and Wahlstrom, R. G. 1982. Sunflower seeds as a fat source in sow gestation and lactation diets. Journal of Animal Science 55: 10821086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. A. and Close, W. H. 1987. Bulky feeds for pigs: a consideration of some non-nutritional aspects. Livestock Production Science 16: 395405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longland, A. C., Carruthers, J. C. and Low, A. G. 1994. The ability of piglets 4 to 8 weeks old to digest and perform on diets containing two contrasting sources of non-starch polysaccharide. Animal Production 58: 405410.Google Scholar
Longland, A. C., Low, A. G., Bray, S. P. and Quelch, D. B. 1993a. Absorption of nutrients by pigs fed diets containing 90 g/kg non-starch polysaccharides from sugar-beet pulp or wheat straw. Animal Production 56: 450 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Longland, A. C., Low, A. G., Close, W. H., Sharpe, C. E., Carruthers, J. C. and Harland, J. I. 1991. The digestion of non-starch polysaccharides from diets containing plain sugar beet pulp by piglets, growing pigs and sows. Animal Production 52: 597 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Longland, A. C., Low, A. G., Quelch, D. B. and Bray, S. P. 1993b. Adaptation to the digestion of non-starch polysaccharide in growing pigs fed on cereal or semi-purified basal diets. British Journal of Nutrition 70: 557566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, P. B. 1989. Voluntary food intake of sows and gilts. In Voluntary food intake of pigs (ed. Forbes, J. M., Varley, M. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.) occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 13, pp. 7177.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1979. Colorimetric determination of hexuronic acids in plant material. Analytical Chemistry 51: 936941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanogias, G. and Pearce, G. R. 1985a. The digestion of fibre by pigs. 1. The effects of amount and type of fibre on apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance and rate of passage. British journal of Nutrition 53: 513530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanogias, G. and Pearce, G. R. 1985b. The digestion of fibre by pigs. 1. Volatile fatty acid concentration in large intestine digesta. British journal of Nutrition 53: 531536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, P. A. 1990. Alfalfa meal. In Non-traditional feed sources for use in swine production (ed. Thacker, P. A. and Kirkwood, R. N.), pp. 111. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Thong, L. A., Jensen, A. H., Harmon, B. G. and Cornelius, S. G. 1978. Distillers dried grains with solubles as a supplemental protein source in diets for gestating swine. Journal of Animal Science 46: 674677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vervaeke, I. J., Graham, H., Dierick, N. A., Demeyer, D. I. and Decuypere, J. A. 1991. Chemical analysis of cell wall and energy digestibility in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 32: 5561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayman, O., Iwanaga, I. I. and Hugh, W. I. 1970. Fetal resorption in swine caused by Lencaena leucocephala (Lam) in the diet. Journal of Animal Science 30: 583588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. and Evans, R. E. 1947. The nutritive value of fodder cellulose from wheatstraw. 1. Its digestibility and feeding value when fed to ruminants and pigs, journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 37: 202210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoiopoulos, P. E., English, P. R. and Topps, J. H. 1982. High-fibre diets for ad libitum feeding of sows during lactation. Animal Production 5: 2533.Google Scholar