Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:04:20.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of performance, water intake and feeding behaviour of weaned pigs given either pellets or meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

M. Laitat ,
M. Vandenheede ,
A. Désiron ,
B. Canart  and
B. Nicks
M. Laitat
Affiliation:
Service de Médecine Porcine et Gestion des Exploitations Porcines
M. Vandenheede
Affiliation:
Service d’Hygiène et Bioclimatologie, University of Liège
A. Désiron
Affiliation:
Service d’Hygiène et Bioclimatologie, University of Liège
B. Canart
Affiliation:
Service d’Hygiène et Bioclimatologie, University of Liège
B. Nicks
Affiliation:
Service d’Hygiène et Bioclimatologie, University of Liège
Get access

Abstract

Performance, water intake and feeding behaviour of two groups of 30 (trial 1), 40 (trial 2) or 50 (trial 3) weaned pigs offered either pellets or meal of the same formulation were compared.

Average daily weight gains (ADG) were higher for pigs given pellets rather than meal in trials 2 (413 v. 363 g/day,

P < 0·001) and 3 (356 v. 324 g/day, P < 0·05). Mean daily water intake (DWI) was higher with meal than with pellets but only during trial 1 (2·31 v. 1·65 I/day, P < 0·01).

The occupation time (ОT) and the number of animals using the feeder simultaneously (N) were higher when pigs were given meal rather than pellets, whatever the animal density: trial 1: 82·6 v. 69·9% (P = 0·05) and 3·8 v. 2·3 (P < 0·01); trial 2: 90·9 v. 77·9% (P > 0·05) and 5·2 v. 3·1 (P < 0·01); trial 3: 96·2 v. 83·6% (P < 0·05) and 5·9 v. 3·8 (P < 0Ό1). When using pellets, ОT and N were always significantly lower during the night than during the day but when using meal in groups of 40 and 50, ОT during the night was almost as high as during the day.

The greater the group size, the lower were ADG (both diets) and DWI (only with meal) and the higher were ОT and N (both diets). Furthermore, significant linear and curvilinear regressions of DWI, ОT and N according to time were calculated.

In conclusion, pigs need more time to eat meal than to eat pellets. Thus the number of pigs per feeder has to be adapted to the food presentation. Too high a number of pigs per feeder impairs feeding behaviour and eventually welfare, by preventing preferential diurnal feeding activity and this may affect productivity.

Keywords

feeding behaviourmealpelletsperformancepigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , December 1999 , pp. 491 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, J. T. 1961. Animal nutrition and veterinary dietetics. W. Green and Son, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Baxter, S. 1984. Intensive pig production: environmental management and design. Granada Publishing, London.Google Scholar
Dagnelie, P. 1973. Theorie et méthodes statistiques (vol. I, TI et III). Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux.Google Scholar
Dumonteil, M. 1966. Technologie de la Fabrication des Aliments du Bétail. Vigot Frères, Paris.Google Scholar
Feddés, J. J. R., Young, B. A. and DeShazer, J. A. 1989. Influence of temperature and light on feeding behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haer, L. C. M. de and Merks, J. W. M. 1992. Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigs. Animal Production 54: 95–104.Google Scholar
Hutson, G. 1997. Look how much feed is wasted. Pig International 27(12): 21–22.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. H. and Becker, D. E. 1965. Effect of pelleting diets and dietary components on the performance of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 24: 392–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krider, J. L. and Carroll, W.E. 1971. Sunne production. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Laitat, M., Vandenheede, M., Désiron, A., Canart, B. and Nicks, B. 1999. Comparison of feeding behaviour and performance of weaned pigs given food in two types of dry feeders with integrated drinkers. Animal Science 68: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, J. C., Eargle, J. C. and Waldorf, R. C. 1987. Effects of weaning weight, co-mingling, group size and room temperature on pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 65: 1201–1206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maton, A. and Daelemans, J. 1992. The impact of feeding devices on water consumption by finishing pigs. Revue de ľ Agriculture, Landbouiutijdschrift 45: 685–690.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. L., Lawrence, A. B. and Whittemore, C. T. 1996a. Effect of individual housing on the feeding behaviour of previously group housed growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, B. L., Lawrence, A. B. and Whittemore, C. T. 1996b. Feeding behaviour of growing pigs using single or multi-space feeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, W. G., Church, D. C. and Pond, K. R. 1995. Basic animal nutrition and feeding. John Wiley and Son, New York.Google Scholar
Quemere, P., Castaing, J., Chastanet, J.-P., Latimier, P., Saulnier, J., Willequet, F. and Grosjean, F. 1988. Effect of the form of feed presentation in meat pigs. 1. Comparison of drv, liquid and pelleted meal. 2. Technical and economic data/ Results of an ITP-AGPM/ITCF-EDF-SEREP trial conducted by the GEAPORC group. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 20: 351–360.Google Scholar
Russell, P. J., Geary, T. M., Brooks, P. H. and Campbell, A. 1996. Performance, water use and effluent output of weaner pigs fed ad libitum with either dry pellets or liquid feed and the role of microbial activity in the liquid feed. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 72: 8–16.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoch, E. R., Binder, S. F., Deyoe, C. W., Allee, G. L. and Behnke, K. C. 1983. Effects of pelleting conditions on performance of pigs fed a corn-soybean meal diet. Journal of Animal Science 57: 922–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabo, P. 1988. Effect of consistency of feed mixtures on fattening performance. Allattenyésztés-és-Takarmrínyozás 37: 39–47.Google Scholar
Young, R. J. and Lawrence, A. B. 1994. Feeding behaviour of pigs in groups monitored by a computerized feeding system. Animal Production 58: 145–152.Google Scholar