Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:46:25.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the body composition of cattle exhibiting compensatory growth and the modifying effects of grazing management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. D. Baker ,
N. E. Young  and
J. A. Laws
R. D. Baker
Affiliation:
Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
N. E. Young
Affiliation:
Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
J. A. Laws
Affiliation:
Animal and Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Friesian steer calves born in August were reared from 3 to 7 months of age on either a low (OL) or high (OH) plane of nutrition. A further group born in October (YH) was also reared on a high plane. At grazing, the performance of calves of the same age but different weights (OL v. OH) or the same weight but different ages (OL v. YH) were compared at two levels of herbage allowance, either 30 or 60 kg dry matter per kg live weight. During the winter, the H groups received silage and concentrate and the L group was given silage only. The OL group had a higher concentration of fat and a lower concentration of water in the empty body at the end of the winter than did the OH and YH groups respectively.

Compensatory growth was exhibited by the OL group at both herbage allowances. Differences in the live-weight and empty body-weight gains of OL and OH cattle could be explained almost entirely by differences in the energy content of the gains whereas this was only partially so when the OL and YH groups were compared. The results indicate that YH cattle had lower herbage intakes even though they were of similar weight to OL cattle.

It was concluded that silage nitrogen is used less efficiently by cattle than is generally assumed and that the levels of gut fill and energy content of the live-weight gains in this experiment were not consistent with the general values suggested by the Agricultural Research Council (1980).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 309 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. Requirements for energy. In The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, pp. 73–119. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Almouist, C. N., Brungardt, V. H., Tyler, W. J. and Waldman, R. C. 1971. Growth and efficiency of Holstein steers as influenced by liveweight and energy intake. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 681–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, H. L., Alder, F. E. and Gibbs, B. G. 1969. An evaluation of an electronic instrument for pasture yield estimation. 2. Use with double sampling for regression estimation. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24: 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D. 1978. Beef cattle at grass: intake and production. In Crazing.: Sward Production and Livestock Output. Proc. Br. Grassld Soc., pp. 2.1–2.7.Google Scholar
Dukes, H. H. 1947. The Physiology of Domestic Animals. Comstock, New York.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G., Johnson, R. R., Preston, R. L., Dockerty, T. R. and Klosterman, E. W. 1972. Protein and energy utilization during compensatory growth in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 34: 310–318.Google Scholar
Hironaka, R. and Kozub, G. C. 1973. Compensatory growth of beef cattle restricted at two energy levels for two periods. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 53: 709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Rodriguez capriles, J. M. 1971. The measurement of herbage intake in grazing studies. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst., 1970, pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Tayler, J. C. and Londsdale, C. R. 1971. The relationship between intensity of grazing and the herbage consumption and growth of calves. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 26: 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W. 1974. The Massey Grass Meter. Dairy Fmg A., pp. 26–30.Google Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. and Holmes, W. 1978. Compensatory growth by beef cattle at grassland or on an alfalfa-based diet. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 297–303.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P. 1975. An evaluation of the efficiency of compensatory growth. In Proc. 3rd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod. (ed. Reid, R. L.), pp. 543–550.Google Scholar
Le Du, Y. L. P. and Penning, P. D. 1982. Animal based techniques for estimating herbage intake. In Herbage Intake Handbook (ed. Leaver, J. D.), pp. 37–75. Br. Grassld Soc., Hurley.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilization by young cattle of dried grass given alone or as a supplement to grass silage. Ph.D Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Lopez Saubidet, C. and Verde, L. S. 1976. Relationship between live weight, age and dry-matter intake for beef cattle after different levels of food restriction. Anim. Prod. 22: 61–69.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R. B. 1967. The growth and body composition of beef cattle fed conserved fodders. In Fodder Conservation (ed. Wilkins, R. J.), Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc, No. 3, pp. 121–129.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. H., Hull, J. L., Weitkamp, W. H. and Bonilla, S. 1965. Compensatory growth responses of fattening steers following various low energy intake regimes on hay or irrigated pasture. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Corse, Elizabeth L. 1970. The effect on protein utilization of feeding different protein supplements via the rumen or via the abomasum in young growing sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 24: 803–809.Google Scholar
Searle, T. W. and Griffiths, D. A. 1983. Equations for postnatal chemical composition of the fat-free empty body of sheep and cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 100: 693–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1975. Methods of evaluating the grazing phase. In Proc. 3rd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod. (ed. Reid, R. L.), pp. 187–195.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1982. Utilization of conserved forages. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 6, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Lonsdale, C. R., Haines, M. J., Cammell, S. B. and Austin, A. R. 1981. The digestion by cattle of grass silage made with formic acid and formic acid-formaldehyde. Br. J. Nutr. 46: 193–207.Google Scholar
Thomson, E. F. 1979. Energy metabolism of sheep and cattle during compensatory growth. Dissertation, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, No. 6382, Zurich.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Crassld Soc. 18: 104–111.Google Scholar
Warner, R. G., Flatt, W. P. and Loosli, J. K. 1956. Dietary factors influencing the development of the ruminant stomach. J. agric. Fd Chem. 4: 788–792.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Osbourn, D. F. 1960. Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biol. Rev. 35: 324–363.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. and Howe, P. E. 1955. Relative effects of continuous and interrupted growth on beef steers. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. No. 1108.Google Scholar