Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:33:55.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Timely diagnosis of dairy calf respiratory disease using a standardized scoring system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2014

Sheila M. McGuirk*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Simon F. Peek
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Respiratory disease of young dairy calves is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, economic loss, and animal welfare concern but there is no gold standard diagnostic test for antemortem diagnosis. Clinical signs typically used to make a diagnosis of respiratory disease of calves are fever, cough, ocular or nasal discharge, abnormal breathing, and auscultation of abnormal lung sounds. Unfortunately, routine screening of calves for respiratory disease on the farm is rarely performed and until more comprehensive, practical and affordable respiratory disease-screening tools such as accelerometers, pedometers, appetite monitors, feed consumption detection systems, remote temperature recording devices, radiant heat detectors, electronic stethoscopes, and thoracic ultrasound are validated, timely diagnosis of respiratory disease can be facilitated using a standardized scoring system. We have developed a scoring system that attributes severity scores to each of four clinical parameters; rectal temperature, cough, nasal discharge, ocular discharge or ear position. A total respiratory score of five points or higher (provided that at least two abnormal parameters are observed) can be used to distinguish affected from unaffected calves. This can be applied as a screening tool twice-weekly to identify pre-weaned calves with respiratory disease thereby facilitating early detection. Coupled with effective treatment protocols, this scoring system will reduce post-weaning pneumonia, chronic pneumonia, and otitis media.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kaneene, JB and Hurd, HS (1990). The National Animal Health Monitoring System in Michigan. 3. Cost estimates of selected dairy-cattle diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 8: 127140.Google Scholar
Lago, A, McGuirk, SM, Bennett, TB, Cook, NB and Nordlund, KV (2006). Calf respiratory disease and pen microenvironments in naturally ventilated calf barns in winter. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 40144025.Google Scholar
Leruste, H, Brscic, M, Heutinck, LF, Visser, EK, Wolthuis-Fillerup, M, Bokkers, EA, Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N, Cozzi, G, Gottardo, F, Lensink, BJ and van Reenen, CG (2012). The relationship between clinical signs of respiratory system disorders and lung lesions at slaughter in veal calves. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 105: 93100.Google Scholar
USDA. 2008. Dairy 2007, Part III: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007 USDA–APHIS–VS, CEAH. Fort Collins, CO #N482.0908.Google Scholar
USDA. 2009. Dairy 2007, Part IV: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007 USDA:APHIS:VS, CEAH. Fort Collins, CO #N494.0209.Google Scholar
van der Fels-Klerx, HJ, Sørensen, JT, Jalvingh, AW and Huirne, RB (2001). An economic model to calculate farm-specific losses due to bovine respiratory disease in dairy heifers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 51: 7594.Google Scholar
Virtala, AM, Mechor, GD, Grohn, YT, Erb, HN and Dubovi, EJ (1996). Epidemiologic and pathologic characteristics of respiratory tract disease in dairy heifers during the first three months of life. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208: 20352042.Google Scholar