Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:50:16.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pedigree and population viability analyses of a conservation herd of Moura pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

H. Carneiro
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Brasília, DF, Brazil
S.R. Paiva
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil
M. Ledur
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves, Concordia, SC
E.A.P. Figueiredo
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves, Concordia, SC
V.H. Grings
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves, Concordia, SC
F.C.P. Silva
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Brasília, DF, Brazil
C. McManus*
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Brasília, DF, Brazil
*
Correspondence to: C. McManus, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF 70919-900, Brazil. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Pedigree and population viability analyses of a conservation herd of Moura breed from Embrapa Swine and Poultry were carried out. ENDOG software was used for pedigree analysis and VORTEX for population viability analysis. The data were obtained with the curator of the herd and a total of 411 animals born between the years of 1999 and 2011 for the analysis with ENDOG. The input data in VORTEX were obtained from a questionnaire answered by the curator of the herd. The Inbreeding Coefficient (F) was 0.06 percent, the average effective population size (Ne) was 30 animals with an average generation interval of 3.48 years. The extinction probability was 0 percent for a simulation period of 100 years and 3 percent for a period of 500 years. The determinant parameters for the viability of this herd were the entry of animals and prolificacy of the breed. Although the study did not indicate immediate risk of extinction of this herd, it should be constantly monitored with controlled population parameters to prevent the extinction of this last herd of Moura pig breed.

Résumé

Les analyses de la viabilité de la population et pedigree ont été effectuées sur un harde de la race Moura de l'Embrapa Porcins et Oiseaux. ENDOG logiciel a été utilisé pour l'analyse de pedigree et VORTEX pour l'analyse de la viabilité de la population. Les données ont été obtenues avec le conservateur du harde et un total de 411 animaux nés entre les années 1999 et 2011 ont été analysés avec ENDOG. Les données d'entrée dans VORTEX ont été obtenus a partir d'un questionnaire auquel ont répondu par le conservateur du harde. Le coefficient de consanguinité (F) était 0,06%, la taille effective de la population moyenne (Ne) était 30 animaux, avec un intervalle de 3,48 ans en moyenne de la production. La probabilité d'extinction était de 0% pour une période de simulation de 100 ans, et 3% pour une période de 500 ans. Les paramètres déterminant pour la viabilité de ce harde a été l'introduction des animaux et la prolificité de la race. Bien que l'étude ne mentionne pas le immédiat extinction, la dernière race de porcs Moura doit être contrôlée en permanence avec les paramètres de population pour éviter l'extinction.

Resumen

Se realizó el análisis de pedigrí y de viabilidad de la población de un rebaño de la raza Moura Embrapa Suínos y Aves. Se utilizó el Software ENDOG para el análisis de pedigree y VORTEX para el análisis de viabilidad de la población. Los datos se obtuvieron con el curador de lo rebaño y un total de 411 animales nacidos entre los años 1999 y 2011 se analizaron con ENDOG. Los datos de entrada en VORTEX se obtuvieron de un cuestionario contestado por el curador de lo rebaño. El coeficiente de endogamia (F) fue de 0.06%, el tamaño medio efectivo de la población (Ne) fue de 30 animales, con un intervalo medio de generación de 3,48 años. La probabilidad de extinción fue de 0% para un período de simulación de 100 años y 3% durante un período de 500 años. Los parámetros más importantes para la determinación de la viabilidad de este rebaño fuerón el ingreso de animales y prolificidad de la raza. Aunque el estudio no indica peligro inmediato de extinción, el último rebaño de la raza Moura debe ser monitoreado constantemente con los parámetros de población para evitar la extinción.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABCS – Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Suínos. 2011. Relatório anual do registro genealógico e provas zootécnicas de suínos. Available at the website www.abcs.com.br Google Scholar
Castro, A.M.M.G., Alvares, E.P., Zocoller-Seno, M.C., Neves, M.F. & Passipiéri, M. 2001. Morphological study of the small intestine of Moura pigs (Sus scrofa – Lineaus, 1758) during fetal development. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 8: 95101.Google Scholar
Castro, S.T.R., Albuquerque, M.S.M. & Germano, J.L. 2002. Census of Brazilian naturalizes swine breeds. Arch. Zootec. 51: 235239.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, S.S. 2000. Suinocultura Dinâmica. Rome, Fep – Mvz Ed, Contagem. 494 pp.Google Scholar
Fávero, J.A., Figueiredo, E.P., Fedalto, L.M. & Woloszyn, N. 2007. A raça de suínos Moura como alternativa para a produção agroecológica de carne. Rev. Bras. Agroecol. 2: 1.Google Scholar
Fimland, E. 2007. Genetic diversity and sustainable management of animal genetic resources, globally. Anim. Genetic Resources Inf. 41: 4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S.K. & Barbosa, A.S. 2005. Conservação e Estudo de raças suínas brasileiras na UFMG – 12 anos. I Simpósio Brasileiro de Melhoramento Animal, 295.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, J.P. & Goyache, F. 2005. A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 122(3): 172176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, H. & Distl, O. 2008. Genetic variability in Hanoverian Warmblood horses using pedigree analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 86: 15031513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrick, P.W. & Kalinowski, S.T. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 139162.Google Scholar
Lacy, R.C. 1989. Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents. Zoo Biol. 8: 111123.Google Scholar
Machado, L.C.P. 1967. Os suínos. Porto Alegre-RS, Editora A granja Ltda. 622p.Google Scholar
Mariante, A.S., Albuquerque, M.S.M., Egito, A.A., McManus, C., Lopes, M.A. & Paiva, S.R. 2009. Present status of the conservation of livestock genetic resources in Brazil. Livestock Sci. 120: 204212.Google Scholar
Mason, I.L. 1996. A World dictionary of livestock breeds, types and varieties, 4th edition. C.A.B International, Wallingford, UK 273.Google Scholar
McManus, C., Paiva, S.R.P., Silva, A.V.R., Murata, L.S., Louvandini, H., Cubillos, G.P.B., Castro, G., Martinez, R.A., Dellacasa, M.S.L. and Perez, J.E. 2010. Phenotypic characterization of naturalized swine breeds in Brazil, Uruguay and Colombia. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 53: 583591.Google Scholar
Miller, P.S. & Lacy, R.C. 2005. Vortex User's Manual. A stochastic simulation of the extinction process. Version 9.50. Brookfield, IL: Chicago Zoological Society.Google Scholar
Nilson, T. 2003. Integrating effects of hunting policy, catastrophic events, and inbreeding depression, in PVA simulation: the Scandinavian wolf population as an example. Biol. Conserv. 115: 227239.Google Scholar
Rangel, T.F. 2012. Amazonian extinction debts. Science 337: 162164.Google Scholar
Sollero, B.P., Paiva, S.R. & Faria, D.A. 2009. Genetic diversity of Brazilian pig breeds evidenced by microsatellite markers. Livestock Sci. 13: 18.Google Scholar
Toro, M.A., Rodriganez, L.S. & Rodriguez, C. 2000. Genealogical analysis of a closed herd of black hairless Iberian pigs. Conserv. Biol. 14: 18431851.Google Scholar
Wearn, O.R., Reuman, D.C. & Ewers, R.M. 2012. Extinction debt and windows of conservation opportunity in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 337: 228232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed