Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:41:25.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of slaughter age on meat quality of Chamarito lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2015

M. Pascual-Alonso ,
L. Aguayo-Ulloa ,
G.C. Miranda-de la Lama ,
S. Alierta ,
J. L. Olleta ,
M.M. Campo ,
M. Villarroel  and
G.A. María
M. Pascual-Alonso*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain
L. Aguayo-Ulloa
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain
G.C. Miranda-de la Lama
Affiliation:
Group of Animal Welfare and Sustainable Livestock Production, Department of Food Science, Metropolitan Autonomous University, UAM-Lerma, State of México, México
S. Alierta
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain
J. L. Olleta
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain
M.M. Campo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain
M. Villarroel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, E.T.S.I.A. Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
G.A. María
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain
*
Correspondence to: M. Pascual-Alonso, Department of Animal Production and Food Scvaience, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, E-50013, (50013) Zaragoza, Spain. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Chamarito lamb was recognized as a quality brand in Spain in April 2010 and this meat is highly appreciated in the local market, but little is known about how a short fattening period may affect final product quality. Twenty lambs, ten from the Ternasco category and ten from the suckling lamb category, were slaughtered and their carcass characteristics compared. All animals were weighed at birth, weaning and before slaughter, and average daily gain was calculated. Cold carcasses were weighed and bruising score, carcass conformation and carcass fatness were noted. The left back of each carcass was separated for dissection. The meat pH, cooking and thawing losses, texture, colour and fatty acid composition were measured on M. longissimus samples. Production traits and meat quality variables were analysed fitting a one-way model with the fixed effect of mean lamb age at harvest. The conformation and degree of fatness of Ternasco-type lambs was not significantly different from suckling lambs but the pH values 24.00 hours post-mortem in muscle (pHult) of the former was slightly higher. The fatty acid profile of suckling lambs was more suitable for a healthy human diet.

Résumé

Avec une chair très appréciée dans le marché local, l'agneau Chamarito a été reconnu avec un label de qualité en Avril 2010. Cependant, on sait peu sur la façon dont une courte période d'engraissement peut affecter la qualité du produit final. Dix agneaux d'un troupeau de race Chamarita ont été abattus dans la gamme de poids de la catégorie « Ternasco » et ont été comparés à dix autres agneaux de la catégorie « Cordero Lechal » (Agneau de Lait). Tous les animaux ont été pesés à la naissance, au sevrage et avant l'abattage, afin de calculer le gain moyen quotidien. Les carcasses froides ont été pesées et le degré de contusions, la conformation et l’état d'engraissement de la carcasse ont été évalués. L’épaule gauche a été séparée de chaque carcasse pour sa dissection. La valeur pH de la viande, les pertes par cuisson et par décongélation, la texture, la couleur et la composition en acides gras de la viande ont été évaluées sur des échantillons du muscle longissimus. Les caractéristiques productives et les paramètres de qualité de la viande, ajustés à un modèle unidirectionnel ayant l’âge de l'agneau comme effet, ont été analysés. Le poids de la carcasse froide a été utilisé comme covariable pour la viande et les paramètres de qualité de la carcasse. Aucune différence significative n'a été décelée pour la conformation et l’état d'engraissement entre les agneaux de type « Ternasco » et ceux de lait, bien que le pH a été légèrement plus élevé pour les premiers. Le profil en acides gras des agneaux allaités s'est avéré plus adapté à un régime alimentaire sain pour les humains.

Resumen

El cordero Chamarito fue reconocido con marca de calidad en abril de 2010 y es una carne muy apreciada en el mercado local, pero poco se sabe acerca de cómo un corto período de engorde puede afectar a la calidad del producto final. Diez corderos de un rebaño de raza Chamarita fueron sacrificados dentro del rango de peso de la categoría tipo Ternasco y se compararon con otros 10 de la categoría de cordero lechal. Todos los animales fueron pesados al nacer, en el momento del destete y antes del sacrificio, y se calculó la ganancia media diaria. Se pesaron las canales en frío y se evaluó el grado de contusiones, la conformación y el engrasamiento de la canal. La espalda izquierda de cada canal fue separada para su disección. El pH de la carne, las pérdidas por cocinado y descongelación, la textura, color y composición de ácidos grasos de la carne se evaluaron en muestras del músculo longissimus. Se analizaron las características productivas y las variables de calidad de la carne ajustadas a un modelo unidireccional con la edad del cordero como efecto. La carne y las variables de calidad de la canal fueron co-variadas con el peso de la canal fría. La conformación y grado de engrasamiento de corderos de tipo Ternasco no fue significativamente diferente de corderos lactantes pero el pHult de los primeros fue ligeramente superior. El perfil de ácidos grasos de corderos lactantes se adecuó más a una dieta humana sana.

Keywords

Chamarito lambmeat qualityproductive traitsshort fattening periodsuckling lambagneaux de race Chamaritaagneaux de laitengraissement courtperformances productivesqualité de la viandecorderos Chamaritoslechalescebo cortocaracteres productivoscalidad de la carne
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 57 , December 2015 , pp. 73 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandrova, N., Banskalieva, V., Angelov, A., Ivanov, I., Laleva, S. & Slavova, P. 1996. Meat quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of triacylglicerols in out-of-season born lambs, pp. 204–205. 42nd Int. Congress of Meat Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Babiker, S.A., El Khider, I.A. & Shafie, S.A. 1990. Chemical composition and quality attributes of goat meat and lamb. Meat Sci., 28: 273–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boccard, R. & Dumont, B.L. 1955. Etude de la production de la viande chez les ovins. I La coupe des carcasses. Définition d'une dêcoupe de référence. Annales De Zootechnie, 3: 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOE 1975. Orden de la Presidencia del Gobierno de 18 de septiembre de 1975 por la que se aprueba la norma de calidad para canales de ovino destinadas al mercado nacional. BOE n° 234 de 30 de septiembre de 1975.Google Scholar
BOE 1987. Orden de 24 de septiembre de 1987 del Ministerio de Relaciones con las Cortes y de la Secretaría del Gobierno, por la que se modifica la Orden de 18 de septiembre de 1975 por la que se aprueba la norma de calidad para canales de ovino destinadas al mercado nacional. BOE n° 233 de 29 de septiembre de 1987.Google Scholar
Campo, M.M., Santolaria, P., Sañudo, C., Lepetit, J., Olleta, J.L., Panea, B. & Albertí, P. 2000. Assessment of breed type and ageing time effects on beef meat quality using two different texture devices. Meat Sci., 55: 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cañeque, V., Diaz, M.T., Alvarez, I., Lauzurica, S., Perez, C. & De la Fuente, J. 2005. The influences of carcass weight and depot on the fatty acid composition of fats of suckling Manchego lambs. Meat Sci., 70: 373–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cifuni, G.F., Napolitano, F., Pacelli, C., Riviezzi, A.M. & Girolami, A. 2000. Effect of age at slaughter on carcass traits, fatty acid composition and lipid oxidation of Apulian lambs. Small Ruminant Res., 35: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer-Rocher, F., Morand-Fehr, P., Kirton, A.H., Delfa, R. & Sierra, I. 1988. Métodos normalizados para el estudio de los caracteres cuantitativos y cualitativos de las canales caprinas y ovinas. Cuadernos INIA, 17. Madrid, España, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias Google Scholar
Cooper, J.E. & Cooper, M. 2007. Introduction to veterinary and comparative forensic medicine. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, H., Dumont, B.L., Pomeroy, R.W. & Weniger, J.H. 1974. Manual in EAAP reference methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci., 1: 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, C.E., Grafhuis, A.E., Muir, P.D. & Chrystall, B.B. 1993. The effect of growth rate and ultimate pH on meat quality of lambs. Meat Sci., 35: 63–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, M.T., Velasco, S., Pérez, C., Lauzurica, S., Huidobro, F. & Cañeque, V. 2003. Physico-chemical characteristics of carcass and meat Manchego breed suckling lambs slaughtered at different weights. Meat Sci., 65: 1247–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, M.T., de la Fuente, J., Lauzurica, S., Pérez, C., Velasco, S., Álvarez, I., Ruiz de Huidobro, F., Anega, E., Blázquez, B. & Cañeque, V. 2005a. Use of carcass weight to classify Manchego sucking lambs and its relation to carcass and meat quality. Anim. Sci., 80: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, M.T., Alvarez, I., De La Fuente, J., Sañudo, C., Campo, M.M., Oliver, M.A., Font i Furnols, M., Montossi, F., San Julian, R., Nute, G.R. & Cañeque, V. 2005b. Fatty acid composition of meat from typical lamb production systems of Spain, United Kingdom, Germany and Uruguay. Meat Sci., 71: 256–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doménech, J.M., Barrio, A.R., Falceto, M.D. & González Jiménez, J.A. 1992. La oveja Chamarita . Serie Estudios n° 25, Logroño, La Rioja, España, Gobierno de La Rioja.Google Scholar
European Commission, 1986. Scientific procedure and breeding of animals for use in scientific procedure establishments. Directive 86/609/ECC 1986.Google Scholar
European Union, 1993. EEC lamb carcass classification system regulations, number: 2137/92 and 461/93. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, L-2985, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Enser, M. 2001. The role of fats in human nutrition. En Rosell, B., ed. Oils and fats, pp. 77–122. Vol 2. Animal carcass fats. Leatherhead, Surrey, UK, Leatherhead Publishing.Google Scholar
Field, R.A., Maiorano, G., McCormick, R.J., Riley, M.L., Russsell, W.C., Williams, F.L. & Crouse, J.D. 1990. Effect of plane of nutrition and age on carcass maturity of sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 1616–1623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, A.V., Enser, M., Richardson, R.I., Wood, J.D., Nute, G.R., Kurt, E., Sinclair, L.A. & Wilkinson, R.G. 2000. Fatty acid composition and eating quality of lamb types derived from four diverse breed × production systems. Meat Sci., 55: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Díez, A.J. 1990. Canales de lechales ovinos churros. Avances en Alimentación y Mejora Animal, 30: 3–11.Google Scholar
Gorraiz, C., Beriain, M.J., Chasco, J. & Iraizoz, M. 2000. Descriptive analysis of meat from young ruminants in Mediterranean systems. J. Sens. Stud., 15: 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N.G. 2007. Animal Welfare and Meat Production. Walling-ford, UK, CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, J. 2006. Factores que influyen sobre el lechazo de raza Churra, pp. 35–69. Tesina de licenciatura. España, Universidad de León.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. La composición corporal de los corderos de raza Churra y su evolución en el transcurso del crecimiento . España, Facultad de Veterinaria de León, Universidad de Oviedo, (Tesis Doctoral).Google Scholar
Kemp, J.D., Shelley, J.M., Ely, D.G. & Moody, W.G. 1972. Effects of castration and slaughter weight on fatness, cooking losses and palatability of lamb. J. Anim. Sci., 34: 60–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguélez, E., Zumalacárregui, J.M., Osorio, M.T. & Mateo, J. 2007. Características de la canal de cordero lechal de diversas razas producidas en España (revisión). ITEA, 103: 14–30.Google Scholar
Miranda-de la Lama, G.C., Villarroel, M., Olleta, J.L., Alierta, S., Sañudo, C. & Maria, G.A. 2009. Effect of the pre-slaughter logistic chain on meat quality of lambs. Meat Sci., 83: 604–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osorio, M.T., Zumalacárregui, J.M., Cabeza, E.A., Figuerira, A. & Mateo, J. 2008. Effect of rearing system on some meat quality traits and volatile compounds of suckling lamb meat. Small Ruminant Res., 78: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, N.H. & Faidhi, A.A. 1990. Quality characteristics of meat from Awassi lambs as affected by slaughter weight and feeding level, pp. 134–141, 36th Int. Congress of Meat Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Rousset-Akrim, S., Young, O.A. & Berdague, J.L. 1997. Diet effects and growth effects in panel assessment of sheep meat odour and flavour. Meat Sci., 45: 169–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russo, V., Preziuso, G. & Verità, P. 2003. EU carcass classification system: carcass and meat quality in light lambs. Meat Sci., 64: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez, A., Alfonso, M., Sañudo, C., Pardos, J.J., Delfa, R., Sierra, I. & Fisher, A. 1998. Caracterización de la calidad de la canal de los tipos ternasco y lechal con Denominación de Origen. Producción Ovina y Caprina, 23: 133–137.Google Scholar
Sañudo, C., Santolaria, P., Sierra, I., Alcalde, M.J. & Touraille, C. 1992. Sensory meat characteristics from light lamb carcasses, pp. 277–280. 38th Int. Congress of Meat Science and Technology. ClermontFerrand.Google Scholar
Sañudo, C., Sierra, I., Alcalde, M.J., Rota, A. & Osorio, J.C. 1993. Calidad de la canal y de la carne en corderos ligeros y semipesados de las razas Rasa Aragonesa, Lacoune y Merino Alemán. Información Técnica Económica Agraria, 89A: 203–214.Google Scholar
Sañudo, C., Santolaria, M.P., María, G., Osorio, M. & Sierra, I. 1996. Influence of carcass weight on instrumental and sensory lamb meat quality in intensive production systems. Meat Sci., 42: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sañudo, C., Campo, M.M., Sierra, I., María, G.A., Olleta, J.L. & Santolaria, P. 1997. Breed effect on carcase and meat quality of suckling lambs. Meat Sci., 46: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sañudo, C., Sánchez, A. & Alfonso, M. 1998. Small ruminant production systems and factors affecting lamb meat quality. Meat Sci., 49: S29–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sañudo, C., Alfonso, M., San Julián, R., Thorkelsson, G., Valdimars-dottir, T., Zygoyiannis, D., Stamataris, C., Piasentier, E., Mills, C., Berge, P., Dransfield, E., Nute, G.R., Enser, M. & Fisher, A.V. 2006. Regional variation in the hedonic evaluation of lamb meat from diverse production systems by consumers in six European countries. Meat Sci., 75: 610–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scollan, N.D., Choi, N.J., Kurt, E., Fisher, A.V., Enser, M. & Wood, J.D. 2001. Manipulating the fatty acid composition of muscle and adipose tissue in beef cattle. Br. J. Nutr., 85: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis System Institute 1998. SAS/STATS User's Guide (Release 6.03). Cary, NC, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Vergara, H. & Gallego, L. 1999. Effect of type of suckling and length of lactation period on carcass and meat quality in intensive lamb production systems. Meat Sci., 53: 211–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergara, H., Berruga, M.I. & Gallego, L. 2001. Efecto del tipo de lactancia, artificial vs natural en la calidad de la canal y de la carne de corderos lechales de raza Manchega. pp. 313–316. Sevilla, España, XXVI Jornadas Científicas y V Jornadas Internacionales de la SEOC.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2011. Chamarito Lamb Promoted among Restaurant Owners and Butchers. (available at: http://www.foodsfromspain.com).Google Scholar
Whittington, F.M., Prescott, N.J., Woood, J.D. & Enser, M. 1986. The effect of dietary linoleic acid on the firmness of backfat in pigs of 85 kg live weight. J. Sci. Food Agr., 37: 735–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J.D., Richardson, R.I., Nute, G.R., Fisher, A.V., Campo, M.M., Kasapidou, E., Sheard, P.R. & Enser, M. 2003. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci., 66: 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar