Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:15:19.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding and conservation programmes for Sahiwal cattle genetic resources in the tropics: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2011

E.D. Ilatsia ,
R. Roessler ,
A.K. Kahi  and
A. Valle Zárate
E.D. Ilatsia*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics (480a), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, National Animal Husbandry Research Centre, Naivasha Kenya, P.O. Box 25, 20117 Naivasha, Kenya
R. Roessler
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics (480a), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
A.K. Kahi
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, 20115 Egerton, Kenya
A. Valle Zárate
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics (480a), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Correspondence to: E.D. Ilatsia, Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics (480a), University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Studies on Sahiwal cattle genetic resources in the tropics have mainly concentrated on evaluating their performance levels, with only a few published reports describing the breed characteristics. The aim of this study was to critically examine the existing breeding and conservation programmes for Sahiwal cattle in the tropics, focusing on Pakistan, India and Kenya as the core regions of development. The study was based on review of both published and unpublished literature highlighting shortcomings and strengths in the existing strategies, and opportunities for improvement and conservation. The Sahiwal breed is utilized for dairy and beef production under smallholder dairy, pastoral extensive and ranching production systems, both as pure-breds or cross-breds. The necessary components to strengthen the breeding programmes such as performance recording, genetic evaluation and artificial insemination (AI) facilities exist to differing degrees. Breeding and conservation efforts benefit from the technical and financial support from government research institutions which also provide incentives to enhance participation in the programmes. However, breeding goals are rather informal and only defined in terms of high-production levels with functional traits largely ignored. There is need for participatory identification of breeding and production goals, and structured cooperation of the small herds, so as to accommodate the specific contributions of the breed in future breeding and conservation programmes.

Résumé

Les études sur les ressources génétiques des bovins Sahiwal aux tropiques se sont principalement concentrées sur l'évaluation de leurs niveaux de performance et uniquement quelques rares publications ont décrit les caractéristiques de la race. Cette étude a pour but l'analyse critique des programmes de sélection et de conservation existants qui concernent les bovins Sahiwal aux tropiques, avec une attention particulière pour le Pakistan, l'Inde et le Kenya en tant que régions principales de développement. L'étude se base sur l'examen des documents publiés et non publiés qui mettent en évidence les lacunes et les points forts des stratégies actuelles, ainsi que les opportunités d'amélioration et de conservation. La race Sahiwal, pure ou croisée, est utilisée pour la production laitière et de viande dans les petites exploitations de production laitière, dans les systèmes de production agropastorale extensive et de pâturage extensif. Les éléments nécessaires pour renforcer le programme de sélection, comme le contrôle des performances, l'évaluation génétique et les installations pour l'insémination artificielle, sont en place à des stades différents. Les initiatives de sélection et de conservation bénéficient de l'appui technique et financier des institutions gouvernementales de recherche qui fournissent également des mesures d'incitation pour accroître la participation aux programmes. Cependant, les objectifs de sélection sont plutôt informels et uniquement définis selon des niveaux de production élevée tandis que les caractères fonctionnels sont largement ignorés. Il est nécessaire d'identifier de façon participative les objectifs de sélection et de production, et une coopération structurée des petits troupeaux pour que les contributions spécifiques de la race soient incluses aux prochains programmes de sélection et de conservation.

Resumen

Los estudios sobre los recursos genéticos pertenecientes al ganado Sahiwal en el trópico han estado centrados, principalmente, en la evaluación de sus niveles de rendimiento, con muy pocos trabajos publicados describiendo las características de la raza. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido examinar de forma crítica los programas de mejora y conservación existentes para el ganado Sahiwal en el trópico, centrados en Pakistán, India y Kenia, como las regiones centrales de desarrollo. El estudio se ha basado en la revisión del material publicado y no publicado hasta el momento, destacando las deficiencias y fortalezas en las estrategias existentes y las oportunidades de mejora y conservación. La raza Sahiwal se utiliza para la producción de leche y carne por parte de pequeños productores de leche y sistemas de producción de cría extensiva, tanto para animales de raza pura como para animales cruzados. Los componentes necesarios para fortalecer el programa de mejora, tales como los registros de rendimiento, las evaluaciones genéticas y las instalaciones para la inseminación artificial existen para diferenciar los distintos grados. Los esfuerzos en mejora y conservación se benefician del apoyo técnico y financiero de instituciones gubernamentales de investigación, que también proporcionan incentivos para aumentar la participación en tales programas. Sin embargo, los objetivos de mejora son más bien informales y sólo definidos en términos de altos niveles de producción, con las características funcionales ignoradas en gran medida. Existe la necesidad de llevar a cabo una identificación participativa de las metas relacionadas con la mejora y con la producción, así como una cooperación estructurada de los rebaños de pequeño tamaño, a fin de dar cabida a las aportaciones específicas de la raza en los futuros programas de mejora y conservación.

Keywords

Breeding programmeConservationSahiwal cattleTropicsProgramme de sélectionconservationbovins SahiwaltropiquesPrograma de mejoraconservaciónganado SahiwalTrópicos
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 49 , December 2011 , pp. 65 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Census Organisation. 2006. Agricultural Census Organisation, Pakistan Livestock Census Report 2006. Lahore, Pakistan: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
Ojango, J.M., Malmfors, B. & Okeyo, A.M. eds. 2006. Animal Genetics Training Resource, Version 2. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute; and Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Bajwa, I.R., Khan, M.S., Ahmad, Z. & Gondal, K.Z. 2002. Genetic parameters of lactation milk yield as affected by lactation length adjustment procedures. In: Seventh World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. CD-ROM Communication No. 01-56.Google Scholar
Banik, S. & Gandhi, R.S. 2006. Animal model versus conventional methods of sire evaluation in Sahiwal cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 19: 1225–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebe, B.O., Udo, H.M.J., Rowlands, G.J. & Thorpe, W. 2003. Smallholder dairy systems in the Kenya highlands: breed preferences and breeding practices. Livestock Production Science, 82: 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, A.A., Khan, M.S., Rehman, Z., Hyder, A.U. & Hassan, F. 2007. Selection of Sahiwal cattle bulls on pedigree and progeny. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 20: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhary, V., Kotherkar, M.D., Raheja, K.L., Kasturiwale, N.N., Khire, D.W. & Kumar, P. 2003. Genetic parameters of first lactation traits in Sahiwal cattle using restricted maximum likelihood technique. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 16: 639–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlin, A., Khan, U.N., Zafar, A.H., Saleem, M., Chaudhry, M.A. & Philipsson, J. 1995. Population structure of the Sahiwal breed in Pakistan. Animal Science, 60: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlin, A., Khan, U.N., Zafar, A.H., Saleem, M., Chaudhry, M.A. & Philipsson, J. 1998. Genetic and environmental causes of variation in milk production traits of Sahiwal cattle in Pakistan. Animal Science, 66: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, D.S., Rathi, S.S. & Raheja, K.L. 2002. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for first lactation and lifetime performance traits in Hariana cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 72: 398–401.Google Scholar
FAO. 1992. Animal genetic resource conservation and management report of the FAO/UNEP technical consultation held in Rome, 1992. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO. 2007. The state of the world's animal genetic resources for food and agriculture, edited by Rischkowsky, Barbara & Pilling, Dafydd. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Gaur, G.K., Kumar, A., Singh, U., Rathi, S.K., Singh, K. & Biswas, B.B. 2006. Physical and morphometric characterization of Frieswal cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 76: 1030–1032.Google Scholar
Government of India. 2003. Country report on state of animal genetic resources of India. Prepared for submission to FAO for first report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources, March 2003.Google Scholar
Government of Pakistan. 2003. Country report on state of animal genetic resources of Pakistan. Prepared for submission to FAO for first report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources, March 2003.Google Scholar
Government of Punjab. 2010. Livestock sector strategy for Government of Punjab. Lahore, Pakistan: Crown Agents.Google Scholar
Hatungumukama, G. & Detilleux, J. 2009. Estimation of genetic and crossbreeding parameters for daily milk yield of Ayrshire × Sahiwal × Ankole crossbred cows in Burundi. Livestock Science, 122: 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iaved, K., Mohiuddin, G. & Abdullah, M. 2001. Effect of inbreeding on some performance traits in Sahiwal cattle. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 21: 27–30.Google Scholar
Ilatsia, E.D., Muasya, T.K., Muhuyi, W.B. & Kahi, A.K. 2007. Genetic and phenotypic parameters and annual trends for milk production and fertility traits of the Sahiwal cattle in semi arid Kenya. Tropical Animal Health Production, 39: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilatsia, E.D., Roessler, R., Kahi, A.K. & Valle Zárate, A. 2010. Production objectives, trait perception and breeding goals of Sahiwal cattle keepers in Kenya. In: Book of Abstracts, Tropentag Conference, 14–16 September 2010, Zürich, Switzerland. 396 pp.Google Scholar
Ilatsia, E.D., Migose, S.A., Muhuyi, W.B. & Kahi, A.K. 2011. Sahiwal cattle in semi arid Kenya: genetic aspects of growth and survival traits and their relationship to milk production and fertility. Tropical Animal Health and Production (Online doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9845-x).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, B.K., Singh, A. & Gandhi, R.S. 2001. Performance evaluation, conservation and improvement of Sahiwal cattle in India. FAO Animal Genetics Research Information, 31: 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahi, A.K., Rewe, T.O. & Kosgey, I.S. 2005. Sustainable community-based organizations for the genetic improvement of livestock in developing countries. Outlook on Agriculture, 34: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahi, A.K., Thorpe, W., Nitter, G. & Baker, R.L. 2000. Crossbreeding for dairy production in the lowland tropics of Kenya. II. Prediction of performance of alternative crossbreeding strategies. Livestock Production Science, 63: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARI. 2004. Animal Production Research Programme, Annual Report 1999. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Khan, S.M., Rehman, Z., Khan, M. & Ahmad, S. 2008. Genetic resource and diversity in Pakistan cattle. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 28: 95–102.Google Scholar
Khan, U.N., Dahlin, A., Zafar, A.H., Saleem, M., Chaudhry, M.A. & Philipsson, J. 1999. Sahiwal cattle in Pakistan: genetic and environmental causes of variation in body weight and reproduction and their relationship to milk production. Animal Science, 68: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimenye, D. 1978. A genetic study of the Kenyan Sahiwal breed. University of Nairobi, Kenya. (PhD thesis)Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Gandhi, R.S. & Haile, A. 2009. Estimation of variance components for milk yield of Sahiwal cattle using repeatability animal models. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 79: 1041–1044.Google Scholar
Meyn, K. & Wilkins, J.V. 1974. Breeding for milk in Kenya, with particular reference to the Sahiwal stud. World Animal Review, 11: 24–30.Google Scholar
MOLD. 2009. National Animal Breeding Draft Policy. Hill Plaza, Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Livestock Development.Google Scholar
MOLFD. 2006. Division of Animal Production, Annual Report. Kajiado and Narok Districts. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development.Google Scholar
Muhuyi, W.B. 1997. A Comparison of the productivity of Kenya Sahiwal and their crosses in large scale dairy dual purpose and beef production systems. University of Nairobi, Kenya. (PhD thesis)Google Scholar
Muhuyi, W.B., Lokwaleput, I. & Sinkeet, S.N. 1999. Conservation and utilisation of the Sahiwal cattle in Kenya. Animal Genetics Resources Information, 26: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulindwa, H.E., Ssewannyana, E. & Kifaro, G.C. 2006. Extracted milk yield and reproductive performance of Teso cattle and their crosses with Sahiwal and Boran at Serere, Uganda. Ugandan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12: 36–54.Google Scholar
Mustafa, M.I., Latif, M., Bashir, M.K. and Ahmad, B. 2002. Productive performance of Red Sindhi cattle under hot and humid environment of Baluchistan province of Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 22: 151–157.Google Scholar
Mwandotto, B.A.J. 1985. Weight, growth and maturing characteristic of Kenya Sahiwal cattle. Texas A&M University, Texas, TX, USA. (PhD thesis)Google Scholar
Mwandotto, B.A.J. 1994. Phenotypic, genetic and environmental parameter estimates of weight, growth and maturing patterns in Sahiwal females. Bulletin of Animal Production, 42: 61–67.Google Scholar
NDRI. 2007. National Dairy Research Institute, Annual report, 2006–2007. Karnal, India: ICAR.Google Scholar
Philipsson, J. 1999. Sustainability of dairy cattle breeding systems utilizing artificial insemination in less developed countries: examples of problems and prospects. In: Galal, S., Boyazoghu, & Hammond, K., eds. Workshop on developing of breeding strategies for low input animal production environments. Norfolk, NE: Bella Italy. ICAR Technical Series No. 3. pp. 551–561.Google Scholar
RCCSC. 2007. Annual report 2006 to 2007. Jhang, Pakistan: Research Centre for Conservation of Sahiwal Cattle.Google Scholar
Rege, J.E.O, & Wakhungu, J.W. 1992. An evaluation of a long term breeding programme in a closed Sahiwal herd in Kenya. Genetic and phenotypic trends and levels of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 109: 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rege, J.E.O., Lomole, M.A. & Wakhungu, J.W. 1992. An evaluation of a long-term breeding programme in a closed Sahiwal herd in Kenya. I. Effects of non-genetic factors on performance and genetic parameter estimates. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 109: 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rege, J.E.O., Kahi, A.K., Okomo-Adhiambo, M.O., Mwacharo, J. & Hanotte, O. 2001. Zebu cattle of Kenya: uses performance farmer preference measures of genetic diversity and options for improved use. In: Animal genetic resources research 1. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.Google Scholar
Rehman, S.U., Ahmad, M. & Shafiq, M. 2006. Comparative performance of Sahiwal cows at the livestock experiment station Bahadurnagar, Okara versus Patadar's herd. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 26: 179–183.Google Scholar
Roessler, R., Ilatsia, E.D., & Valle Zárate, A. 2010. Optimized breeding strategies for the local Sahiwal cattle in Kenya: use values and important breeding traits. In: Fifth All African Conference on Animal Agriculture, 25–28 October 2010, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Singh, K. & Kumar, V. 1997. Comparison of Sahiwal and different grades of Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal crossbreds for feed conversion and nutritional efficiency for growth. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 67: 1122–1124.Google Scholar
Singh, M.K. & Gurnani, M. 2004. Performance evaluation of Karan Fries and Karan Swiss cattle under closed breeding system. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 17: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P.K., Kumar, D. & Varma, S.K. 2005. Genetic studies and development of prediction equations in Jersey × Sahiwal and Holstein-Friesian × Sahiwal half breds. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 18: 0179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S.K. & Nagarcenkar, R. 1997. Factors affecting milk yield and lactation length in Sahiwal cows. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 67: 989–992.Google Scholar
Trail, J.C.M. & Gregory, K.E. 1981. Sahiwal cattle. An evaluation of their potential contribution to milk and beef production in Africa. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) Monogram. No. 3. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: ILCA.Google Scholar
Valle Zárate, A. 1996. Breeding strategies for marginal regions in the tropics and subtropics. Animal Research and Development, 43/44: 99–118.Google Scholar
Valle Zárate, & Markemann, A. 2010. Community based breeding programmes incorporating local breeds: concept, research results and implementation strategy on pigs in Northern Vietnam. In: Nineth World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production, 1–6 August 2010, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 162.Google Scholar
Wasike, C.B., Magothe, T.M., Kahi, A.K., Peters, K.J. 2011. Factors that influence the efficiency of beef and dairy cattle recording systems in Kenya: a SWOT-AHP analysis. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafar, A.H., Ahmad, M., & Rehman, S.U. 2008. Study of some performance traits in Sahiwal cows during different periods. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 28: 84–88.Google Scholar