Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:32:00.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adding value to local breeds: challenges, strategies and key factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Christina Ligda  and
François Casabianca
Christina Ligda*
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Institute, (NAGREF), PO Box 60 272, 57 001, Thessaloniki, Greece
François Casabianca
Affiliation:
INRA-SAD, Laboratoire de Recherches sur le Développement de l'Elevage, Quartier Grossetti, 20250 Corte, France
*
Correspondence to: C. Ligda, Veterinary Research Institute – NAGREF, Greece. email: [email protected]
Get access

Summary

This paper analyzes the articles published in this special issue and also some material presented at the Session “Strategies to add value to local breeds” of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) (August, 2010, Crete, Greece)1 or at other workshops dealing with the issue of adding value to local breeds. The analysis refers to the challenges facing local breeds and the different strategies that can be used to increase their value and thereby enhance their sustainability. These strategies can be categorized, inter alia, according to the species, the specific characteristics of the targeted breeds or production systems, the existence or absence of markets and the characteristics and dynamics of the breeders and other stakeholders. The paper is structured as follows: presentation of an overview of the challenges involved; this is followed by a discussion of strategies for adding value to breeds, which is illustrated with examples; an analysis of the key factors affecting such strategies and ends with some conclusions. Questions remain regarding the society's responsibility for providing support to farmers that keep local breeds that are at risk of extinction and regarding what actions are appropriate when such a breed that was once at risk becomes self-sustainable or, in contrast, when a breed ceases to be self-sustained.

Résumé

Cet article analyse les articles composant ce numéro spécial ainsi que quelques matériaux additionnels présentés dans la session “Stratégies pour ajouter de la valeur aux races locales” du 61ème congrès de la FEZ (Août 2010 dans l'île de Crète en Grèce)1, ou dans d'autres ateliers traitant de ce thème. L'analyse s'appuie sur les enjeux qu'affrontent les races locales, les diverses stratégies envisageables pour accroître leur valeur en promouvant leur utilisation et en soulignant leur intérêt pour la durabilité. On peut classer ces stratégies dans différentes catégories, selon les espèces, les caractéristiques spécifiques des races et des systèmes de production, l'existence de marchés, les dynamiques des éleveurs et d'autres porteurs d'enjeux. L'article est structuré par une introduction qui discute les différents enjeux puis la description des stratégies illustrées par des exemples, et enfin l'analyse des facteurs-clés qui influent sur ces stratégies et les conclusions. La discussion des facteurs-clés est organisée autour de leur impact sur les stratégies pour ajouter de la valeur aux races locales. Demeure questionnée la responsabilité de la société pour soutenir les éleveurs qui maintiennent les races locales, pour assurer des solutions aux races qui atteignent un degré de durabilité par leurs propres moyens, ou au contraire qui n'y parviennent pas.

Resumen

Este trabajo analiza los artículos publicados en este número especial así como algunos materiales presentados en la Sesión “Estrategias para añadir valor a las razas locales” del 61° Encuentro Anual de la Federación Europea de Ciencia Animal (EAAP, por sus siglas en inglés; Agosto de 2010 en Creta, Grecia)1 o de otros talleres en los que se abordó la temática de la adición de valor a las razas locales. El análisis hace referencia a los retos a los que se enfrentan las razas locales y a las diferentes estrategias que pueden ser usadas para incrementar su valor y así, mejorar su sostenibilidad. Estas estrategias pueden ser catalogadas, entre otras maneras, según la especie, las características específicas de las razas objeto de estudio o de los sistemas de producción, la existencia o ausencia de mercados, y las características y dinámicas de los criadores y otros agentes implicados. El trabajo está estructurado como sigue: panorámica general de los retos en cuestión; a continuación, discusión de estrategias para la adición de valor a las razas, lo cual es ilustrado con unos ejemplos, un análisis de los factores clave que afectan a tales estrategias y finalmente, el trabajo termina extrayendo unas conclusiones. Quedan pendientes algunos aspectos como la responsabilidad de la sociedad en la prestación de ayuda a los ganaderos que mantienen las razas locales en peligro de extinción y las acciones que conviene tomar cuando una de estas razas vuelve a ser auto-sostenible tras haber estado amenazada, o cuando, por el contrario, una raza deja de ser auto-sostenible.

Keywords

local breedsadded valueconservationsustainable useraces localesvaleur ajoutéeconservationusage durablerazas localesvalor añadidoconservaciónuso sostenible
Type
Special Issue: Adding value
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 53 , December 2013 , pp. 107 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, L. 2003. Criteria for the recognition and prioritisation of breeds of special genetic importance. Anim. Genet. Res. Inf., 33: 1–9 (available at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/y4924t/y4924t00.pdf).Google Scholar
Araba, A., Chatibi, S. & Casabianca, F. 2012. Valorisation des produits issus des animaux de race locale et leur connexion au marché. Atelier régional sur « La caractérisation et la valorisation des races animales locales et de leurs produits » – Moyen-Orient et Afrique du Nord, Rabat, Maroc, 19–21 Novembre 2012.Google Scholar
Berger, B. 2010. National Coordinator for the Management of Animal Genetic Resources of Austria. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Casabianca, F., Maestrini, O., Franci, O. & Pugliese, C. 2010. Are PDO projects adding value to local breeds? Comparing two case studies, Nustrale and Cinta Senese pig breeds. In Abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Crete, Greece, 23–27 August 2010 (available at http://www.rfp-europe.org/fileadmin/SITE_ERFP/ERFP_meetings/2010_Crete/EAAP_Session14_NustraleCintaSenesePig_Casabianca.pdf).Google Scholar
Cassandro, M. 2013. Comparing local and commercial cattle breeds on added values for milk production and the predicted methane emissions. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
Cicia, G., d'Ercole, E. & Marino, D. 2003. Costs and benefits of preserving farm animal genetic resources from extinction: CVM and bio-economic model for valuing a conservation program for the Italian Pentro horse. Ecol. Econ., 45: 445–459.Google Scholar
Fagouri, S. 2012. Projet Régional de la Sauvegarde et le Développement de la Race Hamra Béni Guil. Atelier régional sur « La caractérisation et la valorisation des races animales locales et de leurs produits » – Moyen-Orient et Afrique du Nord, Rabat, Maroc, 19–21 Novembre 2012.Google Scholar
FAO. 1992. Monitoring animal genetic resources and criteria for prioritization of breeds, by K. Maijala. In Hodges, J., ed. The management of global animal genetic resources. Rome, Italy, Proceeding of an FAO Expert Consultation. April 1992, Animal Production and Health Paper No. 104, Rome (available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/t0665e/T0665E00.pdf).Google Scholar
FAO. 2007a. The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, by Rischkowsky, B. & Pilling, D.. FAO: Rome. (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1250e/a1250e00.htm).Google Scholar
FAO. 2007b. Global Plan for Action for Animal Genetic Resources and the Interlaken Declaration. FAO: Rome. (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1404e/a1404e00.htm).Google Scholar
Gandini, G. & Villa, E. 2003. Analysis of the cultural value of local breeds: a methodology. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 120: 1–11.Google Scholar
Gandini, G., Maltecca, C., Pizzi, F., Bagnato, A. & Rizzi, R. 2007. Comparing local and commercial breeds on functional traits and profitability: the case of Regiana cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 2004–2011.Google Scholar
Gandini, G., Avon, L., Bohte-Wilhelmus, D., Bay, E., Colinet, F.G., Choroszy, Z., Díaz, C., Duclos, D., Fernández, J., Gengler, N., Hoving-Bolink, R., Kearney, F., Lilja, T., Mäki-Tanila, A., Martín-Collado, D., Maurice-van Eijndhoven, M., Musella, M., Pizzi, F., Soini, K., Toro, M., Turri, F., Viinalas, H., the EURECA Consortium & Hiemstra, S.J. 2010. Motives and values in farming local cattle breeds in Europe: a survey on 15 breeds. Anim. Genet. Res., 47: 45–58.Google Scholar
Gandini, G.C., Ollivier, L., Danell, B., Distl, O., Georgoudis, A., Groeneveld, E., Martyniuk, E., van Arendonk, J.A.M. & Woolliams, J.A. 2004. Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestock breeds in Europe. Livestock Prod. Sci., 91(1–2): 173–182.Google Scholar
Hiemstra, S.J., Diaz, C., Duclos, D., de Haas, Y., Mäki-Tanila, A., Martin, D., Pizzi, F., Soini, K., Gandini, G., the EURECA Consortium. 2010. Towards (self) sustainability of local cattle breeds in Europe. In Abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Crete, Greece, 23–27 August 2010.Google Scholar
Karatosidi, D., Marsico, G., Ligda, C. & Tarricone, S. 2013. Valuation of autochthonous bovine genotypes: assessment of the meat quality of the Italian Podolian and the Greek Katerini cattle. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler-Rollefson, I. & Mundy, P. 2010. Introduction. In LPP, LIFE Network, IUCN-WISP and FAO, eds. Adding value to livestock diversity. Rome, FAO Animal Production and Health Paper, No. 168 (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1283e/i1283e00.htm).Google Scholar
Labatut, J., Girard, N., Astruc, J.M. & Bibé, B. 2013. On the importance of diffusion management for local breeds selection. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
Laloe, D. 2012. GALIMED project: Genetics of adaptation of cattle livestock and production systems in the Mediterranean area. Atelier régional sur « La caractérisation et la valorisation des races animales locales et de leurs produits » – Moyen-Orient et Afrique du Nord, Rabat, Maroc, 19–21 Novembre 2012.Google Scholar
Lambert-Derkimba, A., Minéry, S., Barbat, A., Casabianca, F. & Verrier, E. 2010. Consequences of the inscription of local breeds in protected designation of origin cow cheese specifications for the genetic management of the herds. Animal 12: 1976–1986.Google Scholar
Lambert-Derkimba, A., Lauvie, A., and Verrier, E. 2013. Interactions between management of local breeds and valorization of products: examples of French cattle breeds. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
Lauvie, A. 2007. Gérer les populations animales locales à petits effectifs. Approche de la diversité des dispositifs mis en œuvre. AgroParisTech (Ph.D. thesis), p. 377.Google Scholar
Lauvie, A., Lambert-Derkimba, A. & Casabianca, F. 2013. Comparing two local French pig breeds trajectories: diversity of stakes and anchorage in their territories. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
Leenhouwers, J.I. & Merks, J.W.M. 2013. Suitability of traditional and conventional pig breeds in organic and low input production systems in Europe: Survey results and a review of literature. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligda, C. 2012. Domestic project : Mediterranean biodiversity as a tool for the sustainable development of the small ruminant sector: from traditional knowledge to innovation. Atelier régional sur « La caractérisation et la valorisation des races animales locales et de leurs produits » – Moyen-Orient et Afrique du Nord, Rabat, Maroc, 19–21 Novembre 2012.Google Scholar
Ligda, C. & Zjalic, M. 2011. Conservation of animal genetic resources in Europe: overview of the policies, activities, funding and expected benefits of conservation activities. Anim. Genet. Res., 49: 75–86.Google Scholar
Lund, B. 2010. Marketing products based on breed in the Nordic region. In Abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Crete, Greece, 23–27 August 2010.Google Scholar
Olea, L. & Miguel-Ayanz, S. 2006. The Spanish dehesa. In A traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation In Proceeding of the 21st General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Badajoz (Spain), April 2006. Grassland Science in Europe, 11: 3–12.Google Scholar
Papachristoforou, C., Koumas, A. & Hadjipavlou, G. 2013. Strategies to add value to local breeds with particular reference to sheep and goats. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
Pilling, D. 2008. Production environment descriptors for livestock breeds – a review of existing material. In Pilling, D., Rischkowsky, B. & Scherf, B., eds. FAO/WAAP Workshop on Production Environment Descriptors for Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Rome.Google Scholar
Sanz, A., Alberti, P., Blasco, I., Ripoll, G., Alvarez-Rodriguez, J., Bernues, A., Olaizola, A., Zaragoza, P., Rodellar, C., Martin-Burriel, I., Picot, A., Congost, S., Abril, F. & Vijil, E. 2013. Beef quality differentiation in the framework of Serrana de Teruel endangered breed conservation programme. Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
Simon, D.L. & Buchenauer, D. 1993. Genetic diversity of European livestock breeds. EAAP Publication, 66: Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Slimene, A., Ouhichi, R., Chammakhi, L. & Loukil, C. 2013. Développement des filières ovines en Tunisie: cas dela brebis laitière Sicilosarde et de la race «Noire de Thiba». Anim. Genet. Res. (this issue).Google Scholar
United Nations. 1993. Agenda 21: Earth Summit – The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio (available at http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/index.shtml).Google Scholar
Woolliams, J., Berg, P., Maki-Tanila, A., Meuwissen, T. & Fimland, E. 2005. Sustainable Management of Animal Genetic Resources, Nordic Gene Bank Farm Animals, p. 95.Google Scholar
Zjalic, M., Rosati, A., Dimitriadou, A. & Murelli, E. 2010. Geographic indication of animal products and farm animal biodiversity – Case of twelve Northern and five Mediterranean Member States of the European Union In Proceedings of the XI Mediterranean symposium, Zadar, 2010.Google Scholar