Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:04:47.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Second Millennium Painted Pottery Tradition of the Van Lake Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Altan Çilingiroğlu
Affiliation:
University of Izmir

Extract

Some painted pottery recently purchased by the East Anatolian museums is of considerable interest from the point of view of second millennium cultures in the Van and Urmia Basins. Taking into account the suggestion that a cultural break occurred around Lake Van in the second millennium B.C., the importance of these painted vessels increases.

Excavations outside Eastern Anatolia, particularly in North-West Iran, have produced painted pottery in considerable quantities dating to the second millennium B.C. Haftavan Tepe and Geoy Tepe are two of the main sites which supply detailed information about this painted pottery, and suggestions have been made previously by M. R. Edwards about their distribution.

The painted pottery in the East Anatolian museums clearly demonstrates that such vessels are not restricted to the region of Lake Urmia. The occurrence of a painted pottery tradition around Lake Van may well indicate that this region was not culturally isolated in the second millennium B.C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Edwards, , “The Pottery of Haftavan Tepe VIB (Urmia Ware), Iran XIX, 1981, 101 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Reilly, , “Test Excavations at Tilkitepe, 1937”, TTAED 4, 1940, 145 ff.Google Scholar; Lake, , “Van'da Yapılan Hafriyat, 1938”, TTAED 4, 1940, pp. 179–91Google Scholar; Korfmann, , “Die Ausgrabungen von Kirsopp und Silva Lake in den jahren 1938 und 1939 am Burgfelsen von Van (Tušpa) und in Kalecik”, Berytus XXV, 1977, 173 ffGoogle Scholar.

3 von der Osten, , “Die urartäische Topferei aus Van und die Möglichkeiten ihrer Einordnung in die Anatolische Keramik”, Orientalia 21, 1952, p. 309Google Scholar.

4 Edwards, , Iran XIX, 1981, p. 102Google Scholar.

5 Burton-Brown, , Excavations in Azerbaijan, 1948, London, 1951Google Scholar.

6 Muscarella, , “Excavations at Dinkha Tepe, 1966”, Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 25, 1966, p. 16Google Scholar.

7 Dyson, , “The Archaeological Evidence of the Second Millennium B.C. on the Persian Plateau”, CAH II, 1, 686 ffGoogle Scholar.

8 Edwards, , Iran XIX, 1981, 101 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Burney, , “Excavations at Haftavan Tepe 1971”, Iran XI, 1973, 155 ffGoogle Scholar.

10 Schaeffer, , Stratigraphie Compareé et Chronologie de l'Asie Occidentale, Figs. 290 3 and 4 (London, 1948)Google Scholar.

11 Khanzadian, , Elar-Dariani, Figs. 100–1 and 103 (Erevan, 1979)Google Scholar.

12 Martorosyan, , Armenia in the Bronze and Early Iron Ages, p. 57 (Erevan, 1964)Google Scholar.

13 Burney, , “Eastern Anatolia in the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age”, AS 8, 1958, p. 177Google Scholar.

14 Burton-Brown, , Excavations in Azerbaijan, 1948, 69Google Scholar.

15 Burney, , Iran XI, 1973, p. 161Google Scholar.

16 Schaeffer, p. 512.

17 Kuftin, , Archaeological Excavations in Trialeti, Tbilisi, 1941Google Scholar; Minns, , “Trialeti”, Antiquity 67, 1943, pp. 129–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Rubinson, , “The Chronology of the Middle Bronze Age Kurgans at Trialeti”, Bibliotheca Mesopotamica VII, 1977, p. 246Google Scholar.

19 For some painted vessels in the Adana Regional Museum see Taşyürek, O., “Urartian polychrome pottery in the Adana Regional Museum”, TAD XXIV (1), 1977, 181–94Google Scholar.