Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:15:52.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Reassessment of the Mycenaean Pottery at Tarsus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

Since the publication of the Late Bronze Age material from Tarsus in 1956, there have been important developments in the study of Mycenaean pottery–a ware that forms the distinctive feature of the LB IIb levels at Tarsus. At Mycenae itself the work of the Helleno-British expedition has produced comparable material, some stratified, some in bulk, which is presently under study. Major excavations have taken place at Tiryns, Lefkandi, Perati, Ag. Irini (Keos) etc. and are either fully or partially published. In Cyprus the work of Dikaios at Enkomi is published and new work at Paphos has brought startling results. All these affect the standing of the Tarsus material.

My previous opinion, used by Desborough (1964, 206), that the pottery was “Mycenaean of the transition from LH IIIB to C, with the accent rather on LH IIIB” had become quite obviously wrong and this opinion was corrected in my notes on early LH IIIC pottery written in 1968 (French VI, 136 and n. 7). Shortly after, I sought permission to study the Tarsus material when possible and this permission was kindly granted by Professor Goldman and Professor Mellink in April 1971. The significance which Professor Mellink attached to the project can be judged from her comments (1971, 168).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Desborough, V. R. d'a., 1964. The Last Mycenaeans and their Successors, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dikaios, Porphyrios, 1971. Enkomi, Excavations 1948–58, Vol. II, Mainz.Google Scholar
Döhl, Hartmut, 1973 a. “Iria, die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1939” in Tiryns VI 127–94. Mainz.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth I.Late Helladic IIIA 1 Pottery from Mycenae”, BSA. 59, 1964, 241 ff.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth II., “Late Helladic IIIA 2 Pottery from Mycenae”, BSA. 60, 1965, 159 ff.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth III., “A Group of Late Helladic IIIB 1 Pottery from Mycenae”, BSA. 61, 1966, 216 ff.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth IV., “Pottery from Late Helladic IIIB 1 Destruction Contexts at Mycenae”, BSA. 62, 1967, 149 ff.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth V.,“A Group of Late Helladic IIIB 2 Pottery from Mycenae”, BSA. 64, 1969, 71 ff.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth VI., “The First Phase of LH IIIC”, AA. 1969, 133 ff.Google Scholar
French, Elizabeth, 1968. “Schliemann on the Pottery from Mycenae”, Atti del 1° Congresso di Micenologia, 1967 (Roma), I, 170 ff.Google Scholar
Garstang, John, PR5. “Explorations in Cilicia. The Neilson Expedition: Fifth Interim Report”, LAAA XXVI (1939), 89158.Google Scholar
Goldman, Hetty, 1937. “Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus, 1936”, AJA. XLI, 262–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Hetty, 1956. Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus, II. Princeton.Google Scholar
Mellink, Machteld, 1971. “Archaeology in Asia Minor”, AJA. 75, 161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popham, Mervyn and Milburn, Elizabeth, 1971. “Late Helladic IIIC Pottery of Xeropolis (Lefkandi), a summary”, BSA. 66, 333–52.Google Scholar
Popham, Mervyn and Sackett, L. H., 1968. Excavations at Lefkandi, Euboea, 1964–66.Google Scholar
Stubbings, Frank H., 1951. Mycenaean Pottery from the Levant, Cambridge.Google Scholar