Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:33:37.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Priam's Treasure’: clearly a composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

David A. Traill
David A. Traill
Affiliation:
University of California at Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Schliemann's first campaign of excavation at Troy (1871–3) culminated in the discovery of ‘Priam's Treasure’. The find remains the largest and certainly the most controversial ever to have been made at Troy. In 1984 l argued that it was not a single find, as Schliemann reports, but a composite, comprising a core of pieces actually found on 31 May 1873 and a number of other pieces found earlier (Traill 1984 = 1993: 127–53). The article generated a considerable response and, apparently, some confusion. For instance, after demonstrating that Schliemann's story of Sophia's assistance at the discovery was a lie, I asked if there were adequate grounds for believing that he had actually found the pieces of ‘Priam's Treasure’ at Troy rather than, say, bought them from local dealers. I then indicated that the answer was ‘overwhelmingly in the affirmative’ and listed six specific reasons why we should believe this. I concluded: ‘These facts constitute a powerful argument that most, and probably all, of the pieces of ‘Priam's Treasure’ were in fact found in Early Bronze Age Troy’ (Traill 1984: 111 = 1993: 148–9). It would have been remarkable if after this I went on to argue, or even to suggest, that some of the pieces might be fakes. I did not. I have never suggested that any item of ‘Priam's Treasure’ is a fake. Yet critics have persistently represented me, either explicitly or implicitly, as holding this view, thereby muddying waters already murky and distracting attention from the real issues. It is hoped that this paper will refocus the debate on relevant topics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 50 , December 2000 , pp. 17 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

SS = Schmidt, H 1902: Heinrich Schliemann's Sammlung trojanischer Altertümer. Berlin (references are to the catalogue numbers, not page numbers)Google Scholar
TA = Schliemann, H 1874: Trojanische Alterthümer. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
TR = Schliemann, H 1875: Troy and its Remains. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bölke, W 1997: ‘Die Briefwechsel zwischen Heinrich Schliemann und dem Philologen Otto Keller’ Mitteilungen aus dem Heinrich-Schliemann-Museum Ankershagen 5: 35–56Google Scholar
Branigan, K 1974: Aegean Metalwork of the Early and Middle Bronze Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Calder, W M, Traill, D A (eds) 1986: Myth, Scandal and History: The Heinrich Schliemann Controversy and a First Edition of the Mycenaean Diary. DetroitGoogle Scholar
Calmeyer, P 1977: ‘Das Grab eines altassyrischen Kaufmanns’ Iraq 39: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, J 1995: ‘Review of D. Traill, Schliemann of Troy: Treasure and Deceit’ Times Higher Education Supplement 1179 (9 June): 24Google Scholar
Demakopoulou, K (ed) 1990: Troy, Mycenae, Tiryns, Orchomenos. AthensGoogle Scholar
Dörpfeld, W 1902: Troja und Ilion. AthensGoogle Scholar
Easton, D 1976: ‘Towards a chronology for the Anatolian Early Bronze Age’ Anatolian Studies 26: 145–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, D 1984a: ‘Schliemann's mendacity: a false trail?’ Antiquity 58: 197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, D 1984b: ‘Priam's treasure’ Anatolian Studies 34: 141–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, D 1992: ‘Was Schliemann a liar?’ in Herrmann, J (ed), Heinrich Schliemann: Grundlagen und Ergebnisse moderner Archäologie 100 Jahre nach Schliemanns Tod. Berlin: 191–8Google Scholar
Easton, D 1994 ‘Priam's gold: the full story’ Anatolian Studies 44: 221–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, D 1996 ‘The treasures of Troy’ Apollo 144 (July): 58Google Scholar
Easton, D 1997: ‘The excavation of the Trojan treasures, and their history up to the death of Schliemann in 1890’ in Simpson, E (ed), The Spoils of War. New York: 194–9Google Scholar
Easton, D 1998: ‘Heinrich Schliemann: hero or fraud?’ Classical World 91: 335–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korfmann, M, Kromer, B 1993: ‘Demircihüyük, Beṣik-Tepe, Troia — eine Zwischenbilanz zur Chronologie dreier Orte in Westanatolien’ Studia Troica 3: 135–71Google Scholar
Maxwell-Hyslop, K R 1971: Western Asiatic Jewellery c. 3000–612 BC. LondonGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H 1873: Diary 14 (unpublished). Schliemann Archive, Gennadius Library, American School of Classical Studies, AthensGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H 1874a: Trojanische Alterthümer. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H 1874b: Atlas trojanischer Alterthümer. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H 1875: Troy and its Remains. LondonGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H 1881: Ilios. LondonGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H 1900: Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Troja in den Jahren 1871 bis 1873 (rep. of Trojanische Alterthümer with a selection of the Atlas plates) ed Korfmann, M. Munich and ZurichGoogle Scholar
Schliman, Peterburg, Troia (= SchlimanPeter). St Petersburg 1998Google Scholar
Schmidt, H 1902: Heinrich Schliemann's Sammlung trojanischer Altertümer. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, A 1995: ‘Review of D. Traill, Schliemann of Troy: Treasure and Deceit’ Nature 378 (2 November): 113–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, N 1995: ‘Schliemann “a stranger to the truth”’ Minerva 6.4 (July/August): 5Google Scholar
Tolstikov, V, Treister, M 1996: The Gold of Troy. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Traill, D A 1984: ‘Schliemann's discovery of “Priam's treasure”: a re-examination of the evidence’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 104: 96–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traill, D A 1988: ‘Hisarlik, 31 May, 1873, and the discovery of “Priam's Treasure”’ Boreas 11: 227–34Google Scholar
Traill, D A 1992: ‘Priam's Treasure: further problems’ in Herrmann, J (ed), Heinrich Schliemann: Grundlagen und Ergebnisse moderner Archäologie 100 Jahre nach Schliemanns Tod. Berlin: 191–8Google Scholar
Traill, D A 1993: Excavating Schliemann: Collected Papers on Schliemann. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Traill, D A 1995: Schliemann of Troy: Treasure and Deceit. London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Troy: Heinrich Schliemann's Excavations and Finds (=TroyFinds). Athens 1985Google Scholar
Wilford, J N 1996: ‘Archaeologists rally to defense of flawed giant’ New York Times (16 January): B7–8Google Scholar