Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:42:52.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analyses of Tepecik and Tülintepe Metal Artifacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Alaaddin Çukur
Affiliation:
Fırat University. Elazıǧ, Turkey
Şeref Kunç*
Affiliation:
Fırat University. Elazıǧ, Turkey
*
All correspondence should be addressed to Şeref Kunç.

Extract

Tepecik and Tülintepe mounds are situated in the area of the reservoir of Keban dam, now completely flooded since 1974. Both mounds were located in Altınova plain about 31 and 21 km. respectively (by road) east of Elazıǧ in Eastern Turkey. The distance between the two mounds was about 9·5 km. as the crow flies. The rescue excavations at Tepecik were carried out in the years 1968–74 and at Tülintepe in 1971–74 (Esin 1975a, Esin 1975b).

Tepecik was settled from the Late Neolithic period and Tülintepe from Chalcolithic to Medieval times. The sites were situated only about 60 km. away from the important copper and lead mines of Ergani Maden and about 70 km. from the mines of Keban. These two mining regions have often been quoted in the literature as possible copper and lead sources in Turkey since prehistoric times (Tylecote 1976, Seeliger et al. 1985 and Wagner et al. 1986).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bachmann, H. G., 1980, “Early Copper Smelting Techniques in Sinai and in the Negev as Deduced from Slag Investigations.” British Museum Occasional Paper No. 20, 103–34.Google Scholar
Esin, U., 1975a, “Tepecik 1974.” Anatolian Studies, XXV, 46–9.Google Scholar
Esin, U., 1975b, “Tülintepe 1974.” Anatolian Studies, XXV, 50–1.Google Scholar
Esin, U., 1981, “Tepecik ve Tülintepe Kazılarına Ait Arkeolojik Araştırmaların Arkeolojik Deǧerlendirilmesi.” Arkeometri Unitesi Bilimsel Toplantı Bildirileri II, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları, No. 610, 157–82.Google Scholar
Esin, U., 1986, “Tepecik ve Tülintepe (Altınova-Elazıǧ) Ait Bazı Metal Cüruf Analizleri.” II. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantı Bildirileri, T. C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlıǧı, Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüǧü, 2630Mayıs, Ankara.Google Scholar
Kunç, S., Çukur, A. 1987, “Bakır Buluntularda İz Element Daǧılımı.” IX. Kazı Araştırma ve Arkeometri Simpozyumu Bildirileri, T. C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlıǧı, Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüǧü, 610Nisan, Ankara.Google Scholar
Özbal, H., 1983, “Tepecik ve Tülintepe Metal, Filiz ve Cüruf Analizleri.” Arkeometri Unitesi Bilimsel Toplantı Bildirileri III, 24–7 Mayıs, Ankara. 203–18.Google Scholar
Seeliger, T. C., Pernicka, E., Wagner, G. A., Begemann, F., Schmidt-Strecker, S., Eibner, C., Öztunalı, O., Baranyi, I. 1985: “Archeometallurgische Untersuchungen in Nordund Ostanatolien.” Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 32, 597659.Google Scholar
Skoog, D. A., West, D. M., 1976, Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry, 3rd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, Chicago, Sydney, 741 and 749.Google Scholar
Tylecote, T. C. 1976, “Metals and Ores in the Neolithic Period.” History of Metallurgy, The Metal Society, London. Chapter 1.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. A., Pernicka, E., Seeliger, T. C., Lorentz, I. B., Begemann, F., Schmidt-Strecker, S., Eibner, C. and Öztunalı, O. 1986, “Geochemische und Isotopische Charakteristika Früher Rohstoffquellen für Kupfer, Blei, Silber und Gold in der Türkei.” Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 33, 723–52.Google Scholar