Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:46:47.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sultantepe Tablets (Continued) IV. The Cuthaean Legend of Naram-Sin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

O. R. Gurney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The peculiar document here studied is an example of what has been called the “narû literature”. A narû was an engraved stele, on which a king would record the events of his reign; the characteristic features of such an inscription are a formal self-introduction of the writer by his name and titles, a narrative in the first person, and an epilogue usually consisting of curses upon any person who might in the future deface the monument and blessings upon those who should honour it. The so-called “narû literature” consists of a small group of apocryphal narû-inscriptions, composed probably in the early second millennium B.C., but in the name of famous kings of a bygone age. A well-known example is the Legend of Sargon of Akkad. In these works the form of the narû is retained, but the matter is legendary or even fictitious.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 5 , December 1955 , pp. 93 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 93 note 1 Güterbock, H. G., ZA, XLII, 19–21 and 62 ffGoogle Scholar.

page 93 note 2 King, L. W., Chronicles concerning Early Babylonian Kings, II, 87–96Google Scholar; Pritchard, J. B., Ancient Near Eastern Texts, 119Google Scholar.

page 93 note 3 Smith, G., The Chaldaean Account of Genesis, 102 ffGoogle Scholar.

page 93 note 4 In ZA, XII (1897), 317 ffGoogle Scholar.

page 93 note 5 In Recueil de Travaux, XX, 65 ff. (1898)Google Scholar.

page 93 note 6 Jensen, , Keilinschriftliche Bibliothek, VI (1), 290 ffGoogle Scholar.

page 94 note 1 CT, XIII, 39–41Google Scholar (“B” and “C” in the present edition).

page 94 note 2 Ibid., 44 (“A” in the present edition).

page 94 note 3 Haupt, , Das babylonische Nimrodepos (1884–1890), 78 (K.8582)Google Scholar.

page 94 note 4 op. cit. 300 (“D” in this edition).

page 94 note 5 It is not mentioned in the translations of Ungnad and Ebeling ap. Gressmann, Altorientalische Texte und Bilder (1st and 2nd ed. respectively), probably because it was regarded as too small and unimportant. It was recopied by R. Campbell Thompson in his edition of the Epic of Gilgamesh, pl. 34, though he marked it as probably not belonging to the Epic.

page 94 note 6 Forrer, , Die Boghazköitexte in Umschrift, II, nos. 4, 5Google Scholar, with comments on p. 2*.

page 94 note 7 In ZA, XLII, 65–76Google Scholar.

page 94 note 8 The first sign is ma and should be taken with the preceding pronoun a-na-ku, as in the Assyrian text, l. 89.

page 95 note 1 On a possible lacuna at l. 115 see note ad loc.

page 95 note 2 See RLA, s.v. Annubanini.

page 95 note 3 On Subartu see Gelb, Hurrians and Subarian; on Dilmun see Cornwall, P. B. in BASOR, 103, 3–11Google Scholar, and Weidner, in AfO, XV, 169Google Scholar; on Magan and Meluhha see Weidner, in AfO, XVI, 6–10Google Scholar, with references to the extensive older literature. Forrer (Forschungen 5, 39), equates Meluhha with the Indus Valley; see also Gadd, C. J. in The Listener, 3rd March, 1955, 374–6Google Scholar.

page 95 note 4 For the Hittite text see Güterbock, , ZA, XLIV, 49–67Google Scholar.

page 97 note 1 Forrer, , Forschungen 5, 21 (1947)Google Scholar.

page 97 note 2 In Journal Asiatique, Oct.–Dec., 1930, p. 230Google Scholar.

page 103 note 1 E : A horror of lions, death (etc.). Text of B probably corrupt.