Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
The Mycenaean culture of the east Aegean islands should not be considered in relation to that of the Greek Mainland, as has generally been done up until now, but rather in terms of the East Aegean — West Anatolian Interface (fig 1), an area which forms an entity between the Mycenaean islands of the central Aegean and the Anatolian hinterland with Troy at its northern extremity and Rhodes at its southern one.
1 Niemeier, W.-D., ‘The Mycenaeans in Western Anatolia’ Dothan Festschrift, 27–28Google Scholar. For a parallel publication of the recent excavations at Miletos see also Niemeier, W.-D., AA (1997Google Scholar), not available to me in Athens at the time of writing this study.
2 Voigtländer, W., AA (1986), 613–67 especially 622–3Google Scholar, Ibid (1988), 567–625 especially 605.
3 Laviosa, C., ‘Les fouilles de Iasos’, in Proceedings of the XII International Congress of Classical Archaeology Ankara-Izmir 23–30.9.73, Ankara, 1978, 1093–99Google Scholar.
4 Mellink, M., AJA 82 (1978), 321, 324CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Benzi, M., ‘The Late Bronze Age pottery from the Vathy Cave, Kalymnos’, in Zerner, C. et al. ((eds) Wace and Blegen: Pottery as Evidence for Trade in the Aegean Bronze Age 1939–89, Amsterdam, 1993, 275–88Google Scholar.
6 Kastro: Heidenreich, R., AthMit 60–61 (1935–1936), 165–69Google Scholar pl 49a, W. Buttler, Ibid, 190–96 pl 68; Heraion: H. Walter, Ibid 72 (1957), 36–37.
7 Morricone, L., Annuario 50–51 (1972–1973), 296–337Google Scholar.
8 Sampson, A., Athens Annals of Archaeology 13 (1980), 68–73Google Scholar.
9 See Rhodes, 4–7 with references and Papazoglou, E., AD 37A (1982), 139–87Google Scholar.
10 See Hägg, R. and Marinatos, N. (eds), The Minoan Thalassocracy, Myth and Reality, Stockholm, 1984Google Scholar, for references and Branigan, K., BSA 76 (1981), 23–33Google Scholar for the different types of colony.
11 Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 27–28Google Scholar.
12 Furumark, A., Opuscula Archaeologica 6 (1950), 180Google Scholar.
13 Doumas, C., AA (1982), 8–9Google Scholar.
14 See Marketou, T. ‘New evidence on the topography and site history of prehistoric Ialysos’, in Dietz, S. and Papachristodoulou, I. (eds) Archaeology in the Dodecanese, Copenhagen, 1988, 27–33Google Scholar for a synopsis of recent excavations at Trianda and, especially, 28 ‘The colonial character of Trianda is still questionable’.
15 Marthari, M., Marketou, T. and Jones, R. E., ‘LB I ceramic connections between Thera and Kos’, in Hardy, D et al. (eds) Thera and the Aegean World III.1, London, 1990, 171–84Google Scholar with references.
16 Matsas, D., Studia Troica 1 (1991), 159–79Google Scholar, Matsas, D., Aegaeum 12, 235–48Google Scholar.
17 Korfmann, M., ‘Troia: a residential and trading city at the Dardanelles’, in Laffineur, R. and Niemeier, W.-D. (eds) Aegaeum 12 Politeia, Liege, 1995, 173–83Google Scholar.
18 Kayan, I., Studia Troica 5 (1995), 214–17, especially 221Google Scholar fig 8.
19 I. Kayan Pers.comm.
20 Korfmann, M., ‘Troy: topography and navigation’ in Mellink, M. (ed) Troy and the Trojan War, Bryn Mawr, 1986, 1–16Google Scholar.
21 Jablonka, P., Studia Troica 5 (1995), 39–79Google Scholar, Ibid 6 (1996), 65–96
22 Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 7 (1997), 283–85 and fig 6Google Scholar.
23 Ibid, 277–91.
24 Gödecken, K., ‘A contribution to the early history of Miletus. The settlement in Mycenaean times and its connections overseas’, in French, E. B. and Wardle, K. A. (eds) Problems in Greek Prehistory, Bristol, 1986, 307–18Google Scholar, fig 19e LH IIA, fig 19d LM I. Unfortunately, the statistics on which these results are based have never been published.
25 See, for example, Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 7 (1997), 260Google Scholar fig 1.1 top left and second from left, 276.
26 Ibid, 259–67.
27 L. Ahilara, report in E Kathimerine Epta Emeres Kyriake 27.8.95.
28 Lesbos: Lamb, W., Thermi, Cambridge, 1936, fig 42Google Scholar, Kalymnos: Benzi, M, ‘The Late Bronze Age pottery from the Vathy Cave, Kalymnos’, in Zerner, C. et al. ( (eds) Wace and Blegen: Pottery as Evidence for Trade in the Aegean Bronze Age 1939–89, Amsterdam, 1993, 281Google Scholar.
29 Astypalaia: Zervoudaki, E., AD 26B (1971) 550–51Google Scholar, Doumas, C., AD 30B (1975) pl 272Google Scholar; Lemnos: Archontidou, A., Archaiologia 50 (1994) 52 fig 7Google Scholar. I thank C. Boulotis for showing me photographs of his sherds from Koukonesi.
30 Chios, Area D 147–50, Area F 161–64, Area E cist grave 152–53.
31 Rhodes, 83–86, Mountjoy, P. A., PoDIA 1 (1995), 33Google Scholar.
32 For a survey of Mycenaean sites in the Dodecanese see Simpson, R. Hope, BSA 57 (1962), 154–75Google Scholar, R. Hope Simpson and J. Lazenby, Ibid 65 (1970), 47–78, 68 (1973), 127–79.
33 Rodi, 211 Ts.4, 45, 74.
34 Rhodes, 22.
35 Aström, P., ‘Relations between Cyprus and the Dodecanese in the Bronze Age’, in Dietz, S. and Papachristodoulou, I. (eds) Archaeology in the Dodecanese, Copenhagen, 1988, 76–79Google Scholar, Rodi, 173.
36 Rodi, 216.
37 French, E., BSA 64 (1969), 71Google Scholar.
38 Morricone, L., Annuario 50–51 (1972–1973), 388–96Google Scholar. See RMDP Chapter 11 Kos for the suggestion that the LH IIIA2 vase found on a third city floor which provides a terminus antequem for the second city is a much earlier vase. The loss of the excavation notebooks in World War II has left most of the pottery without context.
39 Mee lists 17 tombs in use in LH IIIA2, Rhodes, 87, but I would prefer to date the LH IIIA pottery in Eleona T.17 (no 367) and T.21 (nos 388–90) to LH IIIA1 and that in Eleona T.15 (no 353) to LHIIIB; this leaves 14 tombs in use. Not enough is known about the stratigraphy at Seraglio to determine whether the lack of LH IIIA2 burials wa s the result of a gap in settlement.
40 Morricone, L., Annuario 43–44 (1965–1966), 212–17Google Scholar T.21 137–40, T.46.
41 Blegen, C. et al. , Troy III, 177–396Google Scholar, Troy IV, 3–243.
42 Most recently Gates, M.-H., AJA 98 (1994), 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 99 (1995), 222–23, 100 (1996), 303–04 and Erkanal, A., KST XIV.1 (1993), 495–502Google Scholar, XV.1 (1994), 461–66, XVI.1 (1995), 281–85, Ersoy, Y., BSA 83 (1988), 55–82Google Scholar.
43 Mellink, M., AJA 88 (1984), 450–51Google Scholar, M.-H. Gates, Ibid 98 (1994), 258, 99 (1995), 122, 100 (1996), 303.
44 Gültekin, H. and Baran, M., TAD 13/2 (1964), 122–23Google Scholar, Bammer, A., AnSt 40 (1990), 141–42Google Scholar pl 5a, c–d.
45 Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 30–37Google Scholar.
46 Benzi, M., Bollettino d'Arte Supplement to 31–32 (1985), 30–32Google Scholar with references.
47 Boysal, passim.
48 Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 7 (1997), 275–94Google Scholar.
49 Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 9 (1999Google Scholar), forthcoming, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 42, 228–30Google Scholar.
50 Ibid.
51 Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 7 (1997), 262Google Scholar.
52 Ersoy, Y., BSA 83 (1988), 55–82Google Scholar.
53 Ibid, 67.
54 Ibid, 67–69.
55 Gültekin, H. and Baran, M., TAD 13/2 (1964), 122–23Google Scholar.
56 Bammer, A., AnSt 40 (1990), 146 fig 12Google Scholar, Bammer, A., JOAI 63 (1994)Google Scholar, Beiblatt 28–39.
57 See Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 30–34Google Scholar for the most recent synopsis.
58 Ibid, 30–31.
59 Ibid, 31–32.
60 Ibid, 37.
61 Ibid, 33–36.
62 Benzi, M., Bollettino d'Arte Supplement to 31–32 (1985), 29–34Google Scholar.
63 Boysal, T.2 nos 706, 707, T.18, T.22 nos 635,636,708, T.34 no 992, T.35 no 991, T.39 no 2320.
64 Mee, C., AnSt 28 (1978), 137Google Scholar.
65 Rhodes, 78, 89.
66 Gödecken, K., in French, E. B. and Wardle, K. A. (eds) Problems in Greek Prehistory, Bristol, 1986, 312Google Scholar.
67 Ibid, 312.
68 Rhodes, 89.
69 Ibid, 304.
70 Dickinson, O. T. P. K., The Origins of Mycenaean Civilisation SIMA 49 Gothenburg, 1977, 100Google Scholar.
71 Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 39Google Scholar.
72 See Ersoy, Y., BSA 83 (1988), 67Google Scholar with references.
73 Voutsaki, S., Society and Culture in the Mycenaean World: an analysis of mortuary practices in the Argolid, Thessaly and the Dodecanese. Unpublished Cambridge PhD Thesis, 1993, 133Google Scholar.
74 Gödecken, K., in French, E. B. and Wardle, K. A. (eds) Problems in Greek Prehistory, Bristol, 1986, 311–12Google Scholar.
75 Ersoy, Y., BSA 83 (1988), 55–82Google Scholar.
76 Charitonides, S., AD 17A (1961–1962), 32–76Google Scholar, Zachariadou, O., AD 33A (1978), 249–95Google Scholar, Melas, E., The Islands of Karpathos, Saros and Kasos in the Neolithic and Bronze Age SIMA 68, Gothenburg, 1985Google Scholar, passim.
77 Mountjoy, P. A., PoDIA 1 (1995), 21–35Google Scholar.
78 Ibid, 29 fig 8.
79 C. Blegen et al, Troy III, fig 294.
80 Doumas, C., AD 30B (1975), pl 272b top two vasesGoogle Scholar.
81 Boysal, pl 32.5.
82 Schmidt, H., Heinrich Schliemann's Sammlung trojanischer Altertümer, Berlin, 1902, 158 no 3230Google Scholar.
83 C. Blegen et al, Troy III, fig 292a.
84 Mountjoy, P. A., PoDIA 1 (1995), 21–35Google Scholar.
85 Konstantinopoulos, G., Athens Annals of Archaeology 6 (1973), 124 fig 1Google Scholar.
86 Rodi, 235 T.4.8 2935. There is one LH IIIA1 vessel T.4.7.
87 For example MDP, fig 253, 254.10.
88 Marthari, M., Marketou, T. and Jones, R. E, ‘LB I ceramic connections between Thera and Kos’, in Hardy, D. et al. , (eds) Thera and the Aegean World III.1, London, 1990, 171–84Google Scholar.
89 MDP, figs 106–07.
90 Ibid, fig 107.12.
91 Ersoy, Y., BSA 83 (1988), 72 fig 6.14Google Scholar.
92 Papazoglou, E., Athens Annals of Archaeology 14 (1981), 71Google Scholar.
93 Rodi, pl 150f, RMDP, Rhodes no 130.
94 Özgunel, C., Belleten 47 (1983), pls 26–27aGoogle Scholar.
95 Jones, R. E. and Mee, C., Journal of Field Archaeology 5 (1978), 461–70Google Scholar.
96 Work in progress by H. Mommsen/J. Maran.
97 See Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 20–21Google Scholar fig 3 for a comprehensive list of publications.
98 Gurney, O., The Hittites, 1991Google Scholar, table on 181.
99 Ertekin, A. and Ediz, I., in Mellink, M. et al. (eds) Studies in Honour of Nimet Özgüç, Ankara, 1993, 719–30Google Scholar.
100 Kitchen, K., ‘The basics of Egyptian chronology in relation to the Bronze Age’, in Aström, P. (ed) High, Middle or Low? Part I, Gothenburg, 1987, 37–55Google Scholar.
101 Singer, I., Hethitica 8 (1987), 413–21Google Scholar.
102 Ibid.
103 See Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 7 (1997), 275–94Google Scholar (Phases VId-g) and Ibid 9 (1999), forthcoming. See also Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 42, 228–30Google Scholar.
104 Bryce, T., Oxford Journal of Archaeology 8 (1989), 298CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
105 Otten, H., StBoT 11 (1969)Google Scholar, passim.
106 Güterbock, H. and Mellink, M., AJA 87 (1983), 134, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
107 I thank D. Hawkins for this information.
108 Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 32–34Google Scholar.
109 See Mee, C., AnSt 29 (1978), 135Google Scholar for a summary of the discussion of this wall and Schiering, W, IstMitt 29 (1979), 80–82Google Scholar for the presence of a crosswall suggesting the fortification wall was built on the Anatolian casemate system.
110 I thank D. French and D. Hawkins for this information.
111 Macqueen, J. G., AnSt 18 (1968), 168–85Google Scholar.
112 See Güterbock, H., AJA 87 (1983), 134–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar for a discussion of these two opposing views.
113 Hooker, J., Mycenaean Greece, London, 1976, 126Google Scholar.
114 Singer, I., AnSt 33 (1983), 209–10Google Scholar.
115 Ibid, 210 with reference to Güterbock.
116 Güterbock, H., AJA 87 (1983), 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
117 To reach the Seha River Land the Hittites would probably have had to pass through inland Mira (route Afyon-Banaz-Usak-Kula), suggesting that Mira was subservient or friendly at this time. I thank D. Hawkins for this suggestion.
118 Ibid, 137–38.
119 Singer, I., AnSt 33 (1983), 207Google Scholar.
120 Hoffner, H., AfO Beiheft 19 (1982), 130–37Google Scholar.
121 Singer, I., AnSt 33 (1983), 215Google Scholar.
122 See Steiner, G., Ugarit Forschung 21 (1989), 393–411Google Scholar for an alternative interpretation, namely that the text should read not ‘a ship of the Land of Ahhiyawa’ but ‘a ship of expedition’.
123 Macqueen, J. G., AnSt 18 (1968), 169–85Google Scholar, Mellaart, J., ‘Troy VIIa in Anatolian perspective’, in Foxhall, L. and Davies, J. (eds) The Trojan War, Liverpool, 1984, 63–82Google Scholar.
124 M. Özdoǧan, ‘The Second Millennium of the Marmara Region: What we know and what we don't know’, presented at the congress The Aegaeum and Europe during the Second Millenium BC. Athens 9–11 June 1995.
125 Hawkins, D., Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi 1996 Yilligi, Ankara, 1997, 17–19Google Scholar.
126 See Hawkins, D., ‘The end of the Bronze Age in Anatolia: new light from recent discoveries’, in Cilingiroglu, A. and French, D. (eds) Anatolian Iron Ages 3. The Proceedings of the Third Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium, Van, 6–12 August 1990, Ankara, 1994, 91–94Google Scholar for an overview; see also Singer, I., SMEA 38 (1996), 63–71Google Scholar.
127 Cline, E., Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea (BAR S591), Oxford, 1994, 69Google Scholar.
128 See Shelmerdine, C., AJA 101 (1997), 567Google Scholar with references.
129 Adrimi-Sismani, A., ‘Mykenaikos oikismos sto Dimeni’, in Conference on Ancient Thessaly in Memory of D. Theocharis, Athens, 1992, 272–78Google Scholar, A. Evstathiou, ‘Neoteres anaskaphikes erevnes sten evrytere perioche tes Magoulas ‘Pevkakia’, in Ibid, 279–85.
130 Gates, C., ‘The Mycenaeans and their Anatolian frontier’, in Laffineur, R. and Niemeier, W.-D. (eds ) Aegaeum 12 Politeia, Liege, 1995, 289–98Google Scholar.
131 Already suggested by others, especially Page, D., History and the Homeric Iliad, Berkeley, 1959, 15Google Scholar and Ibid, 15–18 with references, Furumark, A., Opuscula Atheniensia 6 (1965), 109Google Scholar.
132 Marketou, T., ‘New evidence on the topography and site history of prehistoric Ialysos’, in Dietz, S. and Papachristodoulou, I. (eds) Archaeology in the Dodecanese, Copenhagen, 1988, 31–32Google Scholar; M. Benzi, ‘Mycenaean pottery later than LH IIIA1 from the Italian excavations at Trianda on Rhodes’, Ibid, 39–58.
133 Furumark, A., Opuscula Archaeologica 6 (1950), 150Google Scholar.
134 Benzi, M., ‘Mycenaean pottery later than LH IIIA1 from the Italian excavations at Trianda on Rhodes’, in Dietz, S. and Papachristodoulou, I. (eds) Archaeology in the Dodecanese, Copenhagen, 1988, 53–54Google Scholar.
135 Zangger, E. et al. , Hesperia 66 (1997), 613–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
136 Ibid, 622–23 with references.
137 Morricone, L., Annuario 50–51 (1972–1973), 389Google Scholar, estimates c.60,000m2.
138 Rhodes, 87.
139 Ibid, 74.
140 Translation Gurney, O. in Garstang, J. and Gurney, O., The Geography of the Hittite Empire, London, 1959, 111–14Google Scholar.
141 Suggested by J. G. Macqueen at the London Mycenaean Seminar 14.1.98.
142 Morricone, L., Annuario 50–51 (1972–1973), 147–49Google Scholar.
143 Niemeier, W.-D., Dothan Festschrift, 34Google Scholar.
144 Blegen, C. et al. , Troy IV, 3–243Google Scholar.
145 Benzi, M., Bollettino d'Arte Supplement to 31–32 (1985), 32Google Scholar.
146 Mountjoy, P. A., Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 42, 228–30Google Scholar, Studia Troica 9 (1999Google Scholar) in press.
147 Rhodes: Rhodes, Rodi, Dietz, S., Lindos IV. 1, Copenhagen, 1984Google Scholar; Kos: Morricone, L., Annuario 43–44 (1965–1966), 5–311Google Scholar, Papazoglou, E., Athens Annals of Archaeology 14 (1981), 62–75Google Scholar.
148 Zervoudaki, E., AD 26B (1971), 550–51Google Scholar, Konstantinopoulos, G., Athens Annals of Archaeology 6 (1973), 124Google Scholar.
149 BMC 1.1, A1001–1024.
150 Boysal, passim.
151 See Rutter, J., Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 3 (1990), 29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar for an overview.
152 Blegen, C. et al. , Troy IV, 143, 145Google Scholar.
153 Rodi, 222–23.
154 Ibid, 224–25.
155 Rhodes, 90.
156 See RMDP Chapter 11 Chios for the analysis of the pottery on which this conclusion is based.
157 Desborough, V., The Last Mycenaeans and their Successors, Oxford, 1964, 228Google Scholar.
158 For example Vati CVA Denmark 1 Copenhagen 1, pl 43.1, Rodi, pl 20g.
159 MDP, 137, 160.
160 CVA Italy 21 Pigorini 1, pl 2.2.
161 Sieveking, J. and Hackl, R., Die königliche Vasensammlung zu München I, Munich, 1912, no 29Google Scholar.
162 For example Betancourt, P., The History of Minoan Pottery, Princeton, 1985, pl 30AGoogle Scholar.
163 MDP, figs 134, 135.2.
164 Weickert, C., IstMitt 7 (1957), pl 33–34.1Google Scholar.
165 Levi, D., Annuario (1969–1970), 484Google Scholar fig 27 except sherd far right which belongs to a flask.
166 Furumark, A., Mycenaean Pottery: Analysis and Classification, Stockholm, 1941, 643Google Scholar FS 336.1–3.
167 Ibid, 70–71. FS 336.4, the Apollakia vessel, is dated by Furumark to LH IIIC; see Mountjoy, P. A., PoDIA 1 (1995)Google Scholar, for the LH IIIA2 date. There is a good Minoan parallel from Mouliana Evans, A., The Prehistoric Tombs of Knossos, London, 1906, fig 105BGoogle Scholar, but there are also Anatolian parallels (see fn 82).
168 Rodi, pl 64. An octopus stirrup jar with wild life frieze, Ibid, T.80d, may be a Koan import (see below).
169 For example Ibid, pl 144b Lartos 36.
170 There are examples of the based alabastron, for instance W. Rudolph, Tiryns VI, pl 17.4 left.
171 For example Rodi, pl 59f; Kardara, C., Aplomata Naxou, Kinita Evrimata Taphon A kai B, Athens, 1977, pl 44Google Scholar; Immerwahr, S., Agora XIII, T.7.24Google Scholar pl 40.
172 For example Iakovides, S., Perati, to Nekrotapheion, Athens, 1969, 1970, pl 81.431Google Scholar; Kardara, C., Aplomata Naxou, Kinita Evrimata Taphon A kai B, Athens, 1977, pl 56Google Scholar.
173 Attic: Morricone, L., Annuario 43-44 (1965-66), Eleona T.I.2 32-33 figs 4-5.297, Eleona T.15.13 60 fig 32.363, Minoan: Ibid, Eleona T.7.5 43-44 figs 14-15.330.Google Scholar.
174 Rodi, T.80d pl l06f-i.
175 Mountjoy, P. A., Studia Troica 7 (1997), 269-74.Google Scholar.
176 Perrot, G. and Chipiez, C., Histoire de I'Art dans I'Antiquité VI, Paris, 1894, 923-31, C. Mee, AnSt 28 (1978), 143.Google Scholar.
177 RMDP Chapter 11 Rhodes.
178 Rhodes, 89-90.Google Scholar