Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:19:07.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossing the Euphrates in antiquity: Zeugma seen from space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Anthony Comfort ,
Catherine Abadie-Reynal  and
Rifat Ergeç
Anthony Comfort
Affiliation:
Franco-Turkish Mission to Zeugma c/oInstitut Français d'Etudes Anatoliennes, Istanbul
Catherine Abadie-Reynal
Affiliation:
Franco-Turkish Mission to Zeugma c/oInstitut Français d'Etudes Anatoliennes, Istanbul
Rifat Ergeç
Affiliation:
Franco-Turkish Mission to Zeugma c/oInstitut Français d'Etudes Anatoliennes, Istanbul
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews progress in extensive survey work using satellite photographs along the course of the reservoir of the Birecik dam, completed in June 2000. Particular attention has been paid during field work to routes both along and across the river; here it is the east-west routes crossing the river which are examined in detail and in the context of the region's historical geography. The city of Zeugma, which has been the object of recent excavations, was the principal such crossing point but by no means the only one on the middle course of the Euphrates. A subsequent article will discuss north-south routes in the vicinity of the middle Euphrates and the question of its navigability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 50 , December 2000 , pp. 99 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, W F 1888: A Personal Narrative of the Euphrates Expedition (2 vols). LondonGoogle Scholar
Algaze, G 1993a: ‘The cultural aspects of the Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi’ Arkeoloji ve Sanat 56/7: 3–15Google Scholar
Algaze, G 1993b: The Uruk World System. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Algaze, GBreuninger, R., Knudstad, J., 1994: ‘The Tigris-Euphrates archaeological reconnaissance project: final report of the Birecik and Carchemish Dam survey area’ Anatolica 20: 1–96Google Scholar
Archi, APecorella, P. E., Salvini, M., 1971: Gaziantep e sua regione. RomeGoogle Scholar
Arrian, Anabasis Alexandri trans Brunt, P. A.. Loeb edition 1976Google Scholar
Astour, M C 1995: ‘Overland trade routes in ancient western Asia’ in Sasson, J. M. (ed), Civilizations of the Ancient Near East Vol 3. New York: 1401–30Google Scholar
Beitzel, B J 1992: ‘The old Assyrian caravan road in the Mari royal archives’ in Young, D. G. (ed), Mari in Retrospect. Winona Lake, Indiana: 35–57Google Scholar
Bell, G J 1910: ‘The east bank of the Euphrates’ Geographical Journal 5: 513Google Scholar
Blaylock, S RFrench, D. H.Summers, G. D. 1990: ‘The Adiyaman Survey: an interim report’ Anatolian Studies 40: 81–135Google Scholar
Bosworth, A B 1980: A Historical Commentary on Arrian's History of Alexander (vol 1). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, J S 1827: Travels in Mesopotamia. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bullitt, R W 1975: The Camel and the Wheel (reprinted 1990). New YorkGoogle Scholar
Burney, C ALawson, G. R. J., 1959: ‘Urartian relief at Adilcevaz, on Lake Van, and a rock relief from the Karasu, near Birecik’ Anatolian Studies 8: 211–18Google Scholar
Calder, W M 1925: ‘The Royal Road in Herodotus’ Classical Review 39: 7–11Google Scholar
Chapot, V 1907: La Frontière de l'Euphrate de Pompée à la conquête arabe. Paris (reprinted 1967, Rome)Google Scholar
Chesney, R 1850: The Expedition for the Survey of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates (1835 to 1837) (reprinted 1969). New YorkGoogle Scholar
Comfort, A 1997: ‘Satellite remote sensing and archaeological survey on the Euphrates’ Archaeological Computing Newsletter 48: 1–7Google Scholar
Comfort, AAbadie-Reynal, C., Ergeç, R., 1998: ‘Télédétection appliquée à l'étude de la carte archéologique de Zeugma sur l'Euphrate’ Les Nouvelles de l'Archéologie 74: 22–4Google Scholar
Cumont, F 1917: Etudes syriennes. ParisGoogle Scholar
Dillemann, L 1962: Haute Mesopotamie orientale et pays adjacents. ParisGoogle Scholar
Drachmann, A G 1963: The Mechanical Technology of Greek and Roman Antiquity. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Dussaud, R 1927: Topographie historique de la Syrie antique et mediévale. ParisGoogle Scholar
Farrell W, J 1961: ‘A revised itinerary of the route followed by Cyrus the Younger through Syria, 401BC’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 81: 153–5Google Scholar
Forbes, R J 1965: ‘Land transport and road building’ in Studies in ancient technology II. Leiden: 131–92Google Scholar
French, D H 1983: ‘New research on the Euphrates frontier: supplementary notes 1 and 2’ in Mitchell, S.(ed) Armies and Frontiers in Roman and Byzantine Anatolia (BAR International Series 156). Oxford: 71–101Google Scholar
French, D H 1994: ‘Legio III Gallica’ in Dabrowa, E. (ed), The Roman and Byzantine Army in the East. Krakow: 29–46Google Scholar
French, D H in press: Roman Roads in Commagene and Northern SyriaGoogle Scholar
Gaborit, JLeriche, P 1999: ‘Géographie historique de la vallée du Moyen-Euphrate’ in Arnaud, P., Counillon, P. (eds), Geographica Historica, Séminaire Bordeaux, 1994–1995. 167–200Google Scholar
Gawlikowski, M 1996: ‘Thapsacus and Zeugma: the crossing of the Euphrates in Antiquity’ Iraq 58: 123–33Google Scholar
Guest, J S 1992: The Euphrates Expedition. London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Guyer, S 1916: ‘Reisen in Mesopotamien — von Diyarbakr über Urfah nach Aintab’ Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen (62 Jahrgang). Gotha: 299–301Google Scholar
Hellenkemper, H 1976: Burgen des Kreuzritterszeit in der Grafschaft Edessas und in Königreich Kleinarmenien. BonnGoogle Scholar
Hellenkemper, H 1977: ‘Der Limes am nordsyrischen Euphrat: Bericht zu einer archäologischen Landesaufnahme’ in Studien zu den Militärgrenzen Roms II. Köln: 461–71Google Scholar
Hellenkemper, HWagner, J 1977: ‘The God on the stag: a late Hittite rock-relief on the river Karasu’ Anatolian Studies 27: 167–73Google Scholar
Hogarth, D G 1914: Carchemish (vol 1). LondonGoogle Scholar
Invernizzi, A 1993: ‘Seleuceia-on-the-Tigris: centre and periphery in Seleucid Asia’ in Bilde, P et al. (eds), Centre and Periphery in the Hellenistic World. Aarhus: 230–50Google Scholar
Isaac, B 1993: ‘An open frontier’ in Brun, S. et al. (eds), Frontières d'empire: nature et signification des frontières romaines. Nemours: 105–14 (republished in Isaac B. 1998: The Near East under Roman rule. Leiden: 403–26)Google Scholar
Jones, A H M 1937: The Cities of the Eastern Roman Provinces. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D 1994: ‘Zeugma, une ville antique sur l'Euphrate’ Archéologia 306: 26–35Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 1998a: ‘Declassified satellite photographs and archaeology in the Middle East: case studies from Turkey’ Antiquity 72: 553–61Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 1998b: The Twin Towns of Zeugma on the Euphrates (Journal of Roman Archaeology supplementary series 27). Portsmouth, RIGoogle Scholar
Lewis, N N 1987: Nomads and Settlers in Syria and Jordan. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Millar, F 1993: The Roman Near East 31 BC - AD 337. HarvardGoogle Scholar
Oates, D 1968: Studies in the Ancient History of Northern Iraq. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oleson, J P 1984: Greek and Roman Mechanical Waterlifting Devices: the History of a Technology. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Özdurgan, M 1977: Lower Euphrates Basin, 1977 Survey. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Pococke, R 1743: A Description of the East. LondonGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, W 1890: The Historical Geography of Asia Minor. LondonGoogle Scholar
Sertok, KErgeç, R 1999: ‘A new Early Bronze Age cemetery. Excavations near the Birecik Dam, SE Turkey. Preliminary Report’ Anatolica 25: 87–107Google Scholar
Sinclair, T A 1990: Eastern Turkey: an Architectural and Archaeological Survey. LondonGoogle Scholar
Soane, E B 1912: To Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in Disguise (2nd ed 1926, reprinted 1979). AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Starr, S F 1962: The Ancient Roads of Asia Minor: 1961 Expedition. Unpublished paper in library of British Institute of Archaeology at AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Stark, F 1966: Rome on the Euphrates. LondonGoogle Scholar
Stein, G J 1999: Rethinking World Systems: Diasporas, Colonies and Interaction in Uruk Mesopotamia. TucsonGoogle Scholar
Stein, GMisir, A 1994: ‘Mesopotamian-Anatolian interaction at Hacinebi, Turkey’ Anatolica 20: 145–90Google Scholar
Syme, R 1995: Anatolica - Studies in Strabo (ed Birley, A). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Taşyurek, O A 1979: ‘A rock relief of Shalmaneser III on the Euphrates’ Iraq 41: 47–53Google Scholar
Thévenot, de, 1686: The Travels of Monsieur de Thévenot into the Levant (3 parts) trans Lovell, A. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J 1976: Seleukeia am Euphrat/Zeugma. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J 1977: ‘Legio IIII Scythica in Zeugma am Euphrat’ in Studien zu den Militärgrenzen Roms II. Koln: 517–39Google Scholar
Wagner, J 1983: ‘Provincia Osrhoenae’ in Mitchell, S. (ed), Armies and Frontiers in Roman and Byzantine Anatolia. Oxford: 103–23Google Scholar
Wagner, J 1985: Die Römer an Euphrat und Tigris. MainzGoogle Scholar
Winter, I J 1983: ‘Carchemish sa kisad puratti’ Anatolian Studies 33: 177–97Google Scholar
Woolley, C L 1921: Carchemish (vol 2). LondonGoogle Scholar