Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:34:31.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal Bones from Aşıklı Hüyük

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Sebastian Payne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aşıklı Hüyük, a large Aceramic Neolithic mound in the Melendizsuyu valley, some 25 km. SE of Aksaray (prov. Niğde), was visited in 1964 by Ian Todd, who collected a very large quantity of obsidian tools and flakes from the surface, and, at the same time, was able to collect samples including animal bones, charcoal and seeds from a large section cut by the river into the side of the mound (Todd 1966). The obsidian industry suggested a date earlier than Çatal Hüyük East, and this was confirmed by a series of five 14C dates between 7008±130 bc and 6661±108 bc (using the 5568±30 yr half-life) (Todd 1968, Stuckenrath and Lawn 1969). The site is therefore of great interest, being one of the earliest mound sites in Turkey. Its size (c. 250 m. across and 8 m. in height) suggests a lengthy permanent settlement; its location is well-suited for agriculture and animal husbandry (Todd 1980).

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 35 , December 1985 , pp. 109 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Boessneck, J., Müller, H.-H. and Teichert, M. 1964. “Osteologische Unterscheidungsmerkmale zwischen Schaf (Ovis aries Linné) und Ziege (Capra hircus Linné)” Kühn-Archiv 78: 1–29.Google Scholar
von den Driesch, A., 1976. Das Vermessen von Tierknochen aus vor- und frühgeschichtlichen Siedlungen. Institut für Paläoanatomie, Domestikationsforschung und Geschichte der Tiermedizin der Universität München.Google Scholar
Ducos, P., 1978. Tell-Mureybet (Syrie, IX°–VII° millénaires) étude archéozoologique et problèmes d'écologie humaine 1. Éditions du C.N.R.S., Paris.Google Scholar
Geist, V., 1971. Mountain sheep. A study in behavior and evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. W., 1978. “Bovidae.” Ch. 27, pp. 540–72 in: Maglio, V. J., and Cooke, H. B. S., eds., Evolution of African mammals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, E. S., 1961. “Some Pleistocene faunas of the Mediterranean coastal areas.” Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 27: 144–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, B., 1980. “Evidences of animal domestication at Çayönü.” Pp. 285–308 (and Figs. 30–3) in: Çambel, H. and Braidwood, R. J., eds., The joint Istanbul–Chicago Universities' prehistoric research in southeastern Anatolia 1. Edebiyat Fakültesi Basımevi, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Lawrence, B., 1982. “Principal food animals at Çayönü.” Ch. 4, pp. 175–99 in: Braidwood, L. S., and Braidwood, R. J., eds., Prehistoric village archaeology in south-eastern Turkey. The eighth millennium B.C. site at Çayönü: its chipped and ground stone industries and faunal remains. BAR International Series S-138, Oxford.Google Scholar
Murie, A., 1944. The wolves of Mount McKinley. Fauna Series No. 5, U.S. Fauna National Parks, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 1972a. “Partial recovery and sample bias: the results of some sieving experiments.” Pp. 49–64 in: Higgs, E. S., ed., Papers in economic prehistory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 1972b. “Can Hasan III, the Anatolian Aceramic, and the Greek Neolithic.” Pp. 191–4 in: Higgs, E. S., ed., Papers in economic prehistory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 1973. “Kill-off patterns in sheep and goats: the mandibles from Aşsvan Kale.” Anatolian Studies 23: 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, S., 1975. “Partial recovery and sample bias.” Pp. 7–17 in: Clason, A. T., ed., Archaeozoological studies. North Holland/American Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 1983. “The animal bones from the 1974 excavations at Douara Cave.” Ch. 15, pp. 1–108 in: Hanihara, K., and Akazawa, T., eds., Paleolithic site of Douara Cave and paleogeography of Palmyra Basin in Syria. Part III. Bulletin 21, University Museum, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Perkins, D., 1969. “Fauna of Çatal Hüyük: evidence for early cattle domestication in Anatolia.” Science 164: 177–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, D., and Daly, P., 1968. “A hunters' village in Neolithic Turkey.” Scientific American 219: 96–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuckenrath, R., and Lawn, B., 1969. “University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates XI.” Radiocarbon 11: 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, I. A., 1966. “Aşıklı Hüyük—a Protoneolithic site in Central Anatolia.” Anatolian Studies 16: 139–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, I. A., 1968. “The dating of Aşıklı Hüyük in central Anatolia.” AJA 72: 157–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, I. A., 1980. The prehistory of Central Anatolia I: the Neolithic period. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology LX, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H.-P., 1979. Probleme der Neolithisierung des Mittelmeerraums. Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients B28, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar