Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:07:25.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twins' Perception of Their Environment: A Cross-cultural Comparison of Changes Over Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

S. Fischbein  and
R. Guttman
S. Fischbein*
Affiliation:
Department of Special Education, Stockholm Institute of Education, Sweden
R. Guttman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
*
Department of Educational Research, Stockholm Institute of Education, Box 34103, S-100 26 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a previous Swedish twin project (the SLU-project), approximately 300 MZ and DZ twin pairs and controls were followed through the Swedish compulsory school from grade 3 to grade 9. Results from this study indicated an increase of genetic influences on school achievement over time for children from a permissive home environment and a decrease for children from a restrictive home environment. These types of data have generated a more general model for studying heredity-environment interaction in educational settings. To test this model, a cross-cultural comparison over time of twins and controls in the Israeli kibbutz school and in the Swedish compulsory school has been made. Restrictions on the child were originally assumed to be more apparent in the kibbutz environment.

Keywords

PermissiveRestrictiveHome environmentSchool achievementHeredity
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 1992 , pp. 275 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Canter, D (1985): Ed. Facet Theory. Approaches to Social Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
2. Cohen, D, Dibble, E (1975): Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch Gen Psychiatyr 32:1371–1375.Google Scholar
3. Dancer, LS (1985): On the Multidimensional Structure of Self-Esteem: Facet Analysis of Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. In Canter, D (ed.) Facet Theory. Approaches to Social Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
4. Dancer, LS (1990): Suicide Prediction and the Partial Order Scalogram Analysis of Psychological Adjustment. Applied psychology: Special Issue on Facet Theory 39: 479–497.Google Scholar
5. Fischbein, S (1979): Heredity-Environment Influences on Growth and Development During Adolescence. Department of Educational Research, Stockholm Institute of Education.Google Scholar
6. Fischbein, S (1986): Person-Environment Interaction in Educational Settings. Department of Educational Research, Stockholm Institute of Education.Google Scholar
7. Fischbein, S, Guttman, R, Nathan, M, Esrachi, A (1990): Permissiveness-Restrictiveness for Twins and Controls in Two Educational Settings: The Swedish Compulsory School and the Israeli Kibbutz. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 39:245–257.Google Scholar
8. Guttman, L (1968): A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika 33:469–506.Google Scholar
9. Guttman, L, Levy, S (1991): Two Structural Laws for Intelligence Tests. Intelligence 15:79–103.Google Scholar
10. Guttman, R, Nathan, M, Ezrachi, A (1987): Restrictiveness-Permissiveness of their Environment as Perceived by Kibbutz Twins and Singletons. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:165–170.Google Scholar
11. Levy, S, Guttman, L (1985): A Faceted Cross-Cultural Analysis of Some Core Social Values. In Canter, D (ed.) Facet Theory. Approaches to Social Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
12. Shye, S (1978): Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar