Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:51:00.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twins and Congenital Heart Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Maurice Campbell
Maurice Campbell*
Affiliation:
From the Cardiac Department, Guy's Hospital and the Institute of Cardiology, London

Summary and conclusions

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The number of twins in 942 families where the propositus had a congenital malformation of the heart has been studied. The 38 pairs were not significantly more than could be expected by chance: nor were the 21 pairs where one member had a malformation of the heart. In 16 pairs, one was affected and the other normal; and in 5 pairs, one was affected and the other unknown. In 2 pairs, both were unknown because of early deaths; and in 15, both members of the pair were normal. In no pair were both members known to be affected.

There is clear evidence from this series and from the series of Uchida and Rowe (1957) and of Lamy et al. (1957) that where one member of a pair of monozygotic twins has a congenital malformation of the heart, the other is generally normal. It is the exception rather than the rule for both members to be affected, though several examples of such pairs have been reported.

There is some evidence from these three series that monozygotic twins are more liable to have a malformation of the heart than dizygotic twins and their sibs.

It follows from these two findings, that the immediate cause of the malformation of the heart must be environmental, though probably there is some genetic predisposition. A disturbance of the foetal circulation to the affected twin because of a single placenta and chorion seems to be the most likely environmental cause.

I should like to thank Professor Gedda of Rome and Professor Polani for their helpful suggestions and Dr. I. E. Evans for letting me see his unpublished paper on the evidence for monozygosity in some of the pairs of twins included in this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1961 , pp. 443 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1961

References

Bero, J. M. and Kirman, B. H. (1960): Brit. med. J., 1, 1911.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. L. (1932): Amer. J. Anat., 49, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1959): Brit. med. J., 1, 29.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1960) Ann. Hum. Genet., 24, 121.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. (1944) Guy's Hosp. Gazette, 58, 228.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. (1959) Brit. Heart J., 21, 65.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. and Polani, P. E. (1961a) Lancet, 1, 463.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. and Polani, P. E. (1961 b) Brit. Heart J., 23, 477.Google Scholar
Cockayne, E. A. (1938): Quart. J. Med., 7, 479.Google Scholar
Evans, I. E. (1961): Guy's Hosp. Rep., (not yet published).Google Scholar
Foxon, G. E. H. (1959): Brit. Heart J., 21, 51.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, W. (1958) Z. menschl. Vererb.– u. Konstit. – Lehre, 34, 563.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1951): Studio dei Gemelli. Edizioni orizzonte medico, Roma.Google Scholar
Lamy, M., de Grouchy, J., and Schweisguth, O.: (1957) Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 9, 17.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, A. M. and Pasamanick, B. (1955): Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 7 294.Google Scholar
McArthur, N. (1954): Ann. Eugenics, 18, 203.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (1959) Outline of Human Genetics. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Polani, P. E. and Campbell, M. (1955): Ann. Hum. Genet., 19, 209.Google Scholar
Polani, P. E. and Campbell, M. (1960): Ann. Hum. Genet., 24, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Registrar General (1948): Statistical Review of England and Wales, 1948. Part II: Tables, Civil. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Registrar General (1955): Statistical Review of England and Wales, 1955. Part II: Tables, Civil. H.M.S.O. London.Google Scholar
Sandon, F. (1957): J. roy, stat. Soc., 120, 440.Google Scholar
Shallard, B. (1945): Med. J. Austral., 2, 353.Google Scholar
Stern, Curt (1960): Principles of Human Genetics. 2nd ed., Freeman & Co., San Francisco and London.Google Scholar
Uchida, Irene A. and Rowe, R. D. (1957): Amer. J. Hum. Gen., 9, 133.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. A. H. (1950): Brit. J. Soc. Med., 4, 197.Google Scholar
Weinberg, W. (1909): Arch. Rass. – u Gcs-Biol., 6, 322.Google Scholar
Willis, R. A. (1958): The Borderland of Embryology and Pathology, p. 138. Butterworth and Co., London.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. G., Roth, C. B., and Warkany, J. (1953) Amer. J. Anat., 92, 189.Google Scholar