Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:54:16.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Twinning in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

P.P.S. Nylander*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan, (Nigeria)
*
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twinning rates in Nigeria are much higher than in Europe and USA, and appear to be highest in its western and eastern parts. The twinning incidence in a representative population in a town in Western Nigeria, Igbo-Ora, is approximately four times that in Europe and USA.

Zygosity determination has shown that only 8.6% of newborn twin pairs in Ibadan are MZ, compared to approximately 30% in Caucasian populations. Studies in Igbo-Ora have also given similar results, confirming the view that high twinning incidence in Nigeria is due to a very high DZ twinning rate, the MZ rate being the same as in Europe and USA.

The proportion of twins with monochorionic placentae in Ibadan is about 5%, against approximately 20% in UK and USA. The twinning rates in the two populations are 45‰ and 11‰ respectively. This inverse relation (between the twinning rate and the proportion of monochorionic placentae) may be used in calculating the twinning incidence in a population in which the proportion of twins with monochorionic placentation is known.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1970

References

Bulmer, M. G. (1960). The twinning rate in Europe and Africa. Ann. Hum. Genet., 24: 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corney, G., Robson, E. B., Strong, S. J. (1968). Twinning zygosity and placentation. Ann. Hum. Genet., 32: 89.Google Scholar
Cox, M. L. (1964). Incidence and aetiology of multiple births in Nigeria. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Comm., 70: 878.Google Scholar
Imam, A. (1967). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Knox, G., Morley, D. (1960). Twinning in Yoruba women. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Comm., 67: 981.Google Scholar
Lister, U. G. (1969). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Nylander, P. P. S. (1967). Twinning in West Africa. Wld. Med. J., 14: 178.Google Scholar
Nylander, P. P. S. (1969 a). The frequency of twinning in a rural community in Western Nigeria. Ann. Hum. Genet., 33: 41.Google Scholar
Nylander, P. P. S. (1969 b). The value of the placenta in the determination of zygosity. A study of 1052 Nigerian twin maternities. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Comm., 76: 699.Google Scholar
Nylander, P. P. S. (1970). J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Comm., 77.Google Scholar
Nylander, P. P. S., Corney, G. (1969). Placentation and zygosity of twins in Ibadan, Nigeria. Ann. Hum. Genet., 33: 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, E. L. (1963). Twin zygosity and placental form in relation to the outcome of pregnancy. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 87: 566.Google Scholar
Registrar General (1967). Statistical Review of England and Wales for the Year 1965.Google Scholar
Shipley, P. W., Wray, J. A., Hechter, H. H., Arellano, M. G., Borhani, N. O. (1967). Frequency o twinning in California: its relationship to maternal age, parity and race. Amer. J. Epidem., 85: 147.Google Scholar
Strong, S. J., Corney, G. (1967). The Placenta in Twin Pregnancy. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Waboso, M. F. (1966). The causes of perinatal mortality at the Maternity Hospital, Calabar, eastern group of provinces, with some suggestions for preventive measures. J. Nigerian Med. Ass., 3: 368.Google Scholar
Weinberg, W. (1902). Beitrage zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Mehrlingsgeburten beim Menschen. Pflueger. Arch. Ges. Physiol., 88: 346.Google Scholar